Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Don’t Believe the Hype About the Plug-In Car
Minyanville ^ | 12/15/09 | Scott Reeves

Posted on 12/17/2009 5:09:38 AM PST by FlyVet

Hybrid gasoline-electric and all-electric cars will continue to cost more than vehicles with a conventional internal combustion engine for the foreseeable future, putting the new technology beyond the reach of many car buyers.

Sales of hybrid and all-electric cars therefore may be limited to affluent buyers who can afford to make an environmental statement and the vast majority of vehicles will continue to be powered by gasoline or diesel engines. While promising, the new lithium-ion battery technology won’t significantly reduce pollution or dependence on foreign oil by 2030.

(Excerpt) Read more at minyanville.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: automotive; environment; hybrid
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last
To: FlyVet

The problem is that some this crap works in Europe and the left(who think that Europe is so much smarter than we are)think it will work here. What the retards forget is how much bigger this country is vs Europe. An example would be TN from Bristol to Memphis is 500 miles, while London is only 200 miles from Paris and around 600 miles from Berlin.


21 posted on 12/17/2009 5:54:55 AM PST by sticker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FlyVet

You have totally ignored a HUGE portion of the cost of auto ownership. Your obscenely costly HYBRID is going to cost thousands of EXTRA dollars annually for INSURANCE. If you live in a state like Massachusetts, there will be an annual bill called the EXCISE TAX, levied and paid LOCALLY for the privileage of auto ownership.
The extra gasoline costs for my beloved old station wagon will be a mere drop in the cash bucket you’ll be spending.


22 posted on 12/17/2009 5:58:33 AM PST by CaptainAmiigaf (NY TIMES: "We print the news as it fits our views")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tips up

When I was talking about electric cars with my 5 yr old, I mentioned that we’d just park them at night and the electricity fairy would come by and touch it with her wand to recharge it for the next day.

She didn’t buy it. But a lot of “greenies” believe a fairy tale that’s very similar.


23 posted on 12/17/2009 6:00:20 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: far sider

Algore:

“What are these laws [of physics]? We’re in power now, we can change the laws.”


24 posted on 12/17/2009 6:01:08 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: tips up

We are now in what I think is the automobile death spiral. Governments (both state and Federal) derive enormous amounts of tax monies from the sale of gasoline. As these sources of tax revenues dry up, they will be forced to find new ways to offset this deficiency. I think they will increase the taxes on the purchase of new automobiles, licensing, and there will probably even be a mileage tax. These actions will further drive up the cost of owning and operating an automobile, thus fewer will be sold and operated. Plus, throw in hybrids and the supposed electric cars, and the tax revenues will decline even farther. The death spiral will continue with each new round of increased taxation and lower demand for cars. After all, one half of all voters work for government (I consider the public school system as government employees) and they are not going to do away with their own jobs. We can expect higher taxes and increased expense for automobile ownership until only politicians and their benefactors will be able to afford an automobile.


25 posted on 12/17/2009 6:01:24 AM PST by Texas Jack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Haiku Guy

Is that a gallon of electrons?


26 posted on 12/17/2009 6:01:51 AM PST by Brett66 (Where government advances, and it advances relentlessly , freedom is imperiled -Janice Rogers Brown)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: preacher

It’s worse than the gallon to gallon comparison:

1.29 gallons of gasoline containing
148,350 BTUs of energy

to produce 1 gallon of ethanol containing
84,000 BTUs of energy.


27 posted on 12/17/2009 6:04:05 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: snoringbear
You started to nibble at something here...there will of course, be all sorts of tax credits and energy incentives tied to the initial purchase of the e-vehicle and whatever charging mechanism required. They'll probably end up practically giving these cars away, if consumers agree to buy the electricity.

Of course all the car, battery, and infrastructure credits will have to be paid for somehow. In the end, Obama's mathmaticians & Al Gore will show us how it's 100 times less costly to drive "green technology."

28 posted on 12/17/2009 6:05:18 AM PST by Lou L
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: FlyVet

I’m holding out for my flying car.


29 posted on 12/17/2009 6:06:04 AM PST by MaxMax (Obamao can't play in the Olympic reindeer games)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tips up; FlyVet

This could though be optional for us here in my country. We have abundance of electricity, but need to import all gasoline.


30 posted on 12/17/2009 6:11:11 AM PST by Leifur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MrB
It's funny that when you speak facts to people they have no clue.
But most greenie-weinies know their bumper sticker talking points.
31 posted on 12/17/2009 6:12:00 AM PST by MaxMax (Obamao can't play in the Olympic reindeer games)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: MaxMax

One of THE stupidest platitudes,
the one that makes me the angriest,

is the phrase “green jobs”.


32 posted on 12/17/2009 6:13:38 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: wolfcreek
The cost of recharging the vehicle is relatively cheap, no doubt. But, as the article notes, the infrastructure isn't there.

The greenies want their green cars, but no new power plants, no new high tension lines to carry the added electricity. We've already suffered brownouts in CA and the northeast without the added load. They want something for nothing, as usual.

33 posted on 12/17/2009 6:13:54 AM PST by FlyVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: MrB
Greenie-Weinie: Don't you care about the planet?

Me: You smoke pot don't you!

Greenie Weinie: Blank stare

34 posted on 12/17/2009 6:17:17 AM PST by MaxMax (Obamao can't play in the Olympic reindeer games)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: tips up

Oh, but we’re going to power them off of Windmills and Unicorn Poop. (/sarc)


35 posted on 12/17/2009 6:18:06 AM PST by Little Ray (Cheney / Norris in 2012!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MaxMax

I’m getting a Shetland Pony and a surrey with the fringe on top.


36 posted on 12/17/2009 6:39:55 AM PST by 3catsanadog (If healthcare reform is passed, 41 years old will be the new 65 YO.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: far sider

Why do you say it’s about thermodynamics? The efficiency of the engine is one factor. Others are fuel cost, ease of handling and storing the fuel, cost of the engine and drivetrain, and emissions.


37 posted on 12/17/2009 7:10:23 AM PST by frposty (I'm a simpleton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Eye of Unk
ethanol. Its legal to make your own

No it is not.

38 posted on 12/17/2009 7:11:02 AM PST by Jeff Chandler (:: The government will do for health care what it did for real estate. ::)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Eye of Unk
I did some minimal research into this last year and it still may be legal to make as much as 10,000 gallons of ethanol per year for your private use tax free.

Minimal sounds right.

39 posted on 12/17/2009 7:15:07 AM PST by Jeff Chandler (:: The government will do for health care what it did for real estate. ::)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler

Yes, it is legal. There are home units to distill your own ethanol for vehicular use, with a small fuel producer permit.

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&fkt=2422&fsdt=10797&q=make+ethanol+fuel+home&aq=0m&oq=ethanol+fuel+hom&aqi=g-m1

It’s illegal to sell non-taxpaid grain alcohol.


40 posted on 12/17/2009 7:20:01 AM PST by RegulatorCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson