Posted on 12/19/2009 5:27:06 PM PST by Jim Robinson
In the continually harsh public discourse over the Presidents proposals for federally-managed healthcare, the Big Government progressives in both the Democratic and the Republican parties have been trying to trick us. These folks, who really want the government to care for us from cradle to grave, have been promoting the idea that health care is a right. In promoting that false premise, they have succeeded in moving the debate from WHETHER the feds should micro-manage health care to HOW the feds should micro-manage health care. This is a false premise, and we should reject it. Health care is not a right; it is a good, like food, like shelter, and like clothing.
What is a right? A right is a gift from God that extends from our humanity. Thinkers from St. Thomas Aquinas, to Thomas Jefferson, to the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., to Pope John Paul II have all argued that our rights are a natural part of our humanity. We own our bodies, thus we own the gifts that emanate from our bodies. So, our right to life, our right to develop our personalities, our right to think as we wish, to say what we think, to publish what we say, our right to worship or not worship, our right to travel, to defend ourselves, to use our own property as we see fit, our right to due processfairnessfrom the government, and our right to be left alone, are all rights that stem from our humanity. These are natural rights that we are born with. The government doesnt give them to us and the government doesnt pay for them and the government cant take them away, unless a jury finds that we have violated someone elses rights.
What is a good? A good is something we want or need. In a sense, it is the opposite of a right. We have our rights from birth, but we need our parents when we are children and we need ourselves as adults to purchase the goods we require for existence. So, food is a good, shelter is a good, clothing is a good, education is a good, a car is a good, legal representation is a good, working out at a gym is a good, and access to health care is a good. Does the government give us goods? Well, sometimes it takes money from some of us and gives that money to others. You can call that taxation or you can call it theft; but you cannot call it a right.
A right stems from our humanity. A good is something you buy or someone else buys for you.
Now, when you look at health care for what it is, when you look at the US Constitution, when you look at the history of human freedom, when you accept the American value of the primacy of the individual over the fleeting wishes of the government, it becomes apparent that those who claim that healthcare is a right simply want to extend a form of government welfare.
When I make this argument to my Big Government friends, they come back at me with well, if people dont have health insurance, they will just go to hospitals and we will end up paying for them anyway. Why should that be? We dont let people steal food from a supermarket or an apartment from a landlord or clothing from a local shop. Why do we let them take healthcare from a hospital without paying for itl? Well, my Big Government friends contend, thats charity.
They are wrong again. It is impossible to be charitable with someone elses money. Charity comes from your own heart, not from the government spending your money. When we pay our taxes to the government and it gives that money away, thats not charity, thats welfare. When the government takes more from us than it needs to secure our freedoms, so it can have money to give away, thats not charity, thats theft. And when the government forces hospitals to provide free health care to those who cant or wont care for themselves, thats not charity, thats slavery. Thats why we now have constitutional chaos, because the government steals and enslaves, and we outlawed that a long time ago.
Saw it. Talk about incredible.
Too bad we don’t have several more Judge Napolitanos sitting on the surpreme court. On the rare occasion I disagree with him, I can still respect him.
Amen. Truer words have never been spoken.
BUMP!
Spot on.
Pearls of wisdom. I also enjoy Walter E. Williams’ take on this crap.
It doesn’t seem as if the left goes after him they way they do so many others.
That’s because he’s not in the spotlight that much.
He is somewhat intimidating,but as he becomes more and more effective they will try and recreate who he is. They always do.
The Judge needs to either be the AG or a SCOTUS nominee in the Palin administration.
I don’t look for him to be on MTP any time soon, they don’t like rules and regs on there any more than they like conservatives.
Now you are talking!! Go Sarah Go!!
We slept while a whole generation was educated in Leftist Newspeak. Equality too has been reinterrpretated. Equal is “before the law.” Not equal wages nor equal anything else but when charged with crime the attributes of the parties are not to be taken into account. I believe that’s why Justice is BLINDFOLDED.
Just too good, had to be repeated!!
Says all that needs to be said...in fewer than 750 words.
Judge Napolitano for President!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.