Lawyers??? I thought being mentally ill was a prequisit to practising law.
If I have offended any lawyers out there.... Ha ha ha haaaaaaa!!!!!
This is a clear and ripe 1st amendment case.
Law is rooted in morality, Morality only exists if there is a God otherwise its just “make it up as you go for convenience sake.” I would question the sanity, and validity, of Athiest lawyers.
Gulag stuff. The country is in deep, deep trouble.
So, if you answer “yes” to any of those questions, that means you are insane?
Either those questions were specifically designed to deny this particular individual a license, or they were designed to excluse Christians in general.
Either way, this cannot be allowed to stand.
He wouldn’t be the first mentally ill Christian crusader lawyer. Jack Tompson comes to mind, but at least he was good enough to fool the psych examiner.
Now there is a religion test to take the bar?
Religion=psychosis?
We should be very, very frightened.
...suggests a sub-clinical level of bipolar disorder which would warrant further consideration by a psychiatrist.
Since it is absolutely impossible to pin down any psychiatrist on what "bipolar disorder" actually means, what in the Hell would define a "sub-clinical level of bipolar disorder"?
I tell you what it means to me. It means "I don't like this guy or his opinions so I am going to throw out some fancy psychiatrist type words that make him sound/look bad and thus taint him with mental illness in a way that nobody can ever prove is wrong.
This method was used by Marxists in both the Soviet Union and China against their dissidents. They used different names for the "disorders", but the underlying philosophy was the same.
"Our philosophy and worldview is so obviously true and correct that if you disagree with us, you MUST be crazy and we will treat you as such." And that's when they even bothered to try to justify it.
Mark