Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Fire Napolitano
National Review ^

Posted on 12/27/2009 12:44:08 PM PST by Sub-Driver

Fire Napolitano [Jonah Goldberg]

Understandbly, the White House is trying very hard to get out in front of the would-be Christmas bomber story. The head of the Department of Homeland Security isn't helping. I watched her on three shows and each time she was more annoying, maddening and absurd than the pevious appearance. It is her basic position that the "system worked" because the bureaucrats responded properly after the attack. That the attack was "foiled" by a bad detonator and some civilian passengers is proof, she claims, that her agency is doing everything right. That is just about the dumbest thing she could say, on the merits and politically. I would wager that not one percent of Americans think the system is "working" when terrorists successfully get bombs onto planes (and succeed in activating them). Probably even fewer think it's fair that they have to take off their shoes, endure delays and madness while a known Islamic radical — turned in by his own father — can waltz onto a plane (and into the country). DHS had no role whatsoever in assuring that this bomb didn't go off. By her logic if the bomb had gone off, the system would have "worked" since it has done everything right.

Napolitano has a habit of arguing that DHS is a first responder outfit. Its mission is to deal with "man-caused-disasters" afer they occur. It appears she really believes it. If the White House wants to assure people that it takes the war on terror seriously (a term Robert Gibbs used this morning by the way), they could start by firing this patenly unqualified hack.

Here she is her own words, over at RealClearPolitics.


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bho44; bhodhs; firenapolitano; flight253; janetnapolitano; jonahgoldberg; napoleonitano; napolitano; resignwitchresign; thesystemworked
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last
To: Sub-Driver
If the White House wants to assure people that it takes the war on terror seriously (a term Robert Gibbs used this morning by the way), they could start by firing this patently unqualified hack.

Patently unqualified hack... I like it. Send her back to doing something she's more qualified for, like delivering newspapers.

41 posted on 12/27/2009 1:43:13 PM PST by Rummyfan (Iraq: it's not about Iraq anymore, it's about the USA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Krankor

haha!


42 posted on 12/27/2009 1:52:18 PM PST by Skywalk (Transdimensional Jihad!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: potlatch

43 posted on 12/27/2009 1:52:51 PM PST by devolve ( . . . . . . . . . woodpile alert - "My muslim faith....." - "Kobe" Osama . . . . . . . . . . . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: machogirl

I was striving for more toad-like. Alas.


44 posted on 12/27/2009 1:53:29 PM PST by Tawiskaro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: machogirl
Good for the passengers! You can BET they automatically profiled!!!
45 posted on 12/27/2009 1:53:40 PM PST by Brad’s Gramma (BG x 2 (and a heartbeat was heard today....))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Napolitano has a habit of arguing that DHS is a first responder outfit. Its mission is to deal with “man-caused-disasters” afer they occur. It appears she really believes it.


I agree she has this habit.

So Obama who is responsible???????


46 posted on 12/27/2009 1:56:57 PM PST by Presbyterian Reporter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: devolve

Just ‘wafted’ around, huh?


47 posted on 12/27/2009 2:00:50 PM PST by potlatch (~~ COGITO ERGO SUM~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver


48 posted on 12/27/2009 2:05:10 PM PST by JustPiper (Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. ~ML King)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

I wonder how the Kenyan’s round of golf was today.


49 posted on 12/27/2009 2:11:17 PM PST by Oldeconomybuyer (The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: az.b1bbomberfxr

“This bull dyke is sooo ugly she’d make Quasimodo go LIMP!!”

I think it’s a reflection of the real ugly on the inside.


50 posted on 12/27/2009 2:17:45 PM PST by Magic Fingers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Brad's Gramma

Yep. This is now a new version of terrorism. Don’t have to bomb anything, just toy with the passengers (non-whites, muslims doing the toying) and if the passengers are too encumbered by PC, good, and if not encumbered by PC, good, because they will threaten to sue. It’s a win-win.


51 posted on 12/27/2009 2:18:30 PM PST by machogirl (First they came for my tagline.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Tawiskaro

A little more “Green” might help. ;)


52 posted on 12/27/2009 2:27:22 PM PST by machogirl (First they came for my tagline.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
We got lucky. She and her minions did nothing and caused nothing to happen. She failed. She needs to stop lying and be fired, right Fu ing now!!!!!
53 posted on 12/27/2009 2:28:48 PM PST by oldenuff2no (I'm a VET and damn proud of it!!! I did not fight for a socialist America!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
We got lucky. She and her minions did nothing and caused nothing to happen. She failed. She needs to stop lying and be fired, right Fu ing now!!!!!
54 posted on 12/27/2009 2:29:33 PM PST by oldenuff2no (I'm a VET and damn proud of it!!! I did not fight for a socialist America!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Skywalk

I seem to recall one of the reasons for Homeland Security was to shield the department from procedures and requirements imposed by collective bargaining agreements. There was a huge fight about it in the house. Bush and company wanted the DHS to have the flexibility to hire, fire, and assign duties to personnel based on merit and competence instead of seniority, and connections.

I read recently that Obama and company are trying to rewrite that portion of the legislation to allow DHS employees to be represented by unions. (SEIU) Sorry, I can’t find the source at the moment.

If you think security and air travel is bad now wait until the TSA is represented by Andy Stern and his associates.


55 posted on 12/27/2009 2:42:03 PM PST by Parawan ("These are Times that Try men's souls." Tom Payne Dec. 23, 1776)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Skywalk
I still recall the story of the man who presented himself to the FBI in NYC and told them he was to be part of an upcoming mission to hijack planes and fly them into buildings, but he had changed his mind. He was sent on his way and told they would get in touch with him.

And then there was the agent in AZ, I think, who was alerted to the number of Muslim men wanting to take flight training, but not taking off or landing, just how to navigate and control the airliner in the air. He tried many times to interest Washington in the report but never could.

Now we have a man with no baggage, a one-way ticket paid for with cash and no passport being allowed to fly into an American city.

I am very doubtful we will be able to defend against our enemies much longer unless some serious changes are made. Despite what those in charge think inconveniencing millions of hard-working, tax-paying American citizens with needless security measures has not made us any safer. All that and the ONLY thing that saved us from a disaster was a faulty detonation of device successfully carried on board an international flight and concealed until minutes before landing.

I don't think we can plan on that kind of luck to save us too many times in the future.

56 posted on 12/27/2009 2:57:00 PM PST by jwparkerjr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ
NO! She'll want her old job back as Governor of AZ. We don't want her.
57 posted on 12/27/2009 3:05:09 PM PST by GrannyAnn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GrannyAnn

She was your Governor? Please tell me she’s fallen on her head or something since that time...


58 posted on 12/27/2009 3:43:35 PM PST by GOPJ (Rick Santelli for Man of the Year! - Freeper mewzilla)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Skywalk
But generally, they are interested in avoiding risk and protecting the gravy train, and projecting competence. Appearing competence is not only vital for the org’s success (in existing, not in meeting it’s mission) but is important to the self-image of the various technocrats and appointees who infest the halls of power.

This sounds exactly like Napolitano's claims that everything worked as it should have. To admit the obvious facts would reveal the incompetence...no matter that the lie is so obvious a 3 year old could see through it.

And I agree with you, although there are some ideologically driven elements it's the structure of bureaucracy that's built for mediocrity and failure. Therefore the only rational approach to government is smaller is always better because it allows less room for bureaucracy.

59 posted on 12/27/2009 3:57:14 PM PST by highlander_UW (Democrats used to be just the party of corruption, now they are the party of treason as well)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Skywalk
“Occasionally, fulfilling certain objectives related to the mission can enhance the group’s status or budget, and therefore, they will pursue that objective.”

So, where does the US military and its attendant bureaucracies fit into this picture? Perhaps the winning of wars are the occasional filling of certain objectives?

60 posted on 12/27/2009 4:51:35 PM PST by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson