Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dodd cut aviation security funding in July
Hot Air ^

Posted on 12/29/2009 5:58:28 AM PST by Def Conservative

Mark Hemingway has a long memory for budgeting amendments, which he proves at the Washington Examiner. With focus returned to airport security, Mark reminds us of how Chris Dodd paid off a political constituency by getting a little pork to the firefighters union that supported his bid for the presidency in 2007-8, which got $10 million in “firefighter assistance grants” from FEMA’s budget. All Dodd had to do was to get $4.5 million from another source — which turned out to be the TSA’s explosives detection systems:

(Excerpt) Read more at hotair.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Connecticut
KEYWORDS: 111th; chrisdodd; democrats; obama; terrorism
He is scum.
1 posted on 12/29/2009 5:58:29 AM PST by Def Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Def Conservative

B’tard. Grrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr.


2 posted on 12/29/2009 6:02:46 AM PST by RushIsMyTeddyBear (I don't have a 'Cousin Pookie'.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Def Conservative

Dodd needs a wedgie in dishonor of the underwear bomber. I wonder if people in CT would have the fortitude to vote is sorry @$$ out of office ?


3 posted on 12/29/2009 6:05:44 AM PST by CORedneck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Def Conservative

And will this ever make it’s way to MSNBC? Liberal does country wrong..........I do not think so, time for us to do their job, let’s give this one a BIG SHOUT OUT!


4 posted on 12/29/2009 6:05:59 AM PST by blueyon (It is worth taking a stand even if you are standing alone!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueyon

Sending it to Laura Ingraham now...


5 posted on 12/29/2009 6:06:38 AM PST by Def Conservative (Obama is a joke.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Def Conservative

This is precisely the kind of crud that incenses me whenever some MOC accuses a president of this or that — CONGRESS has a good deal of culpability in every single thing to do with the budget, they write the thing every year!


6 posted on 12/29/2009 6:08:24 AM PST by MozarkDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MozarkDawg

You’re on the right track. Now, a majority in Congress share the same affiliation with the President so things will move quickly in the wrong direction.


7 posted on 12/29/2009 6:50:02 AM PST by 12Gauge687 (Extremism in the defense of liberty is no vice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Def Conservative
This is the kind of thing which demonstrates that it's unfair to blame the PEOPLE of the United States for all the trangressions of the national government. Do we really expect the people at large to know when such a budget decision has been made? We only find out--if we find out--after the consequences have been made plain. It simply isn't possible for us to be aware of all the transgressions and forsee the consequences.

One might argue that the PEOPLE should not elect Senator Dodd, but only a majority of Connecticutt voters are required to send him back to office.

One could argue that the 17th amendment was a mistake. But WE didn't pass it. And even if it weren't the case, the CT legislature could easily appoint a Dodd to the Senate, and the people of the other 49 states would be powerless.

It just shows how the national government at all times has the upper hand. It shows that it is too much to ask for Americans at large to be aware of every single bad idea being passed in the national Legislature.

8 posted on 12/29/2009 6:52:29 AM PST by Huck (The Constitution is an outrageous insult to the men who fought the Revolution." -Patrick Henry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Def Conservative
Aviation security function should be contracted out to El Al. ;-)
9 posted on 12/29/2009 6:55:36 AM PST by verity (Obama Lies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Def Conservative

Dodd needs to be held accountable.


10 posted on 12/29/2009 6:56:38 AM PST by KC_Conspirator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CORedneck

As if they needed another reason to vote that POS out of office. Now this. Jeez.


11 posted on 12/29/2009 6:56:38 AM PST by Thermalseeker (Stop the insanity - Flush Congress!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Huck
It just shows how the national government at all times has the upper hand.

Behold! The reason for the 10th Amendment revealed!

12 posted on 12/29/2009 7:00:18 AM PST by Thermalseeker (Stop the insanity - Flush Congress!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Def Conservative

It is such a good thing we are all sheep that depend on daddy government to keep us safe. They love us all and want the best for us. They’ll keep us safe.

How many terrorists have to be foiled by the passengers before we realize the government doesn’t give one hot damn about keeping you safe?

You want safe flights? Arm the passengers! They’ve been the most successful in foiling hijackings since 9/11.

If you look to government as some sort of all-caring, all-knowing, all-powerful father figure meant to keep you safe, you deserve neither safety nor freedom; you deserve to be the slave you are.


13 posted on 12/29/2009 7:07:42 AM PST by MichiganConservative (I wouldn't hate the government if it didn't exist. (Evil + Stupid) === Government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Def Conservative

Peter Schiff is running against Dodd.

http://schiffforsenate.com/?q=about


14 posted on 12/29/2009 7:10:02 AM PST by MichiganConservative (I wouldn't hate the government if it didn't exist. (Evil + Stupid) === Government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thermalseeker
Behold! The reason for the 10th Amendment revealed!

The 10th amendment is completely worthless. It has nothing to do with the actual design or delegation of powers in the system. It adds nothing whatsoever to the construction of the government. It merely expresses a sentiment without any objective, observable definition. In fact, it begs the question.

The 10th amendment speaks of "the powers not delegated to the United States." This is where they beg the question. If Article 1, Section 8 successfully defines the limits of national power, of what additional use is the 10th amendment? If Article 1, Section 8 does NOT successfully define the limits of national power, in what manner will the phrase "powers not delegated to the United States" resolve such controversies?

The 10th amendment was duct tape, added later by opponents of consolidated government, as an attempt to add safeguards to the system they were resigned to accepting. But this amendment is a worthless protection, as history has shown.

James Madison, who opposed this amendment, described it thusly:

It is a still greater cause of regret, if the distinction be, as it appears to me, altogether fanciful. If a line can be drawn between the powers granted and the rights retained, it would seem to be the same thing, whether the latter be secured by declaring that they shall not be abridged, or that the former shall not be extended. If no such line can be drawn, a declaration in either form would amount to nothing.

James Madison letter to g Washington Decr, 5, 1789

In other words, if Article 1, Section 8 fails to enforce limits on national power, the 10th amendment will also fail to do so, because they are two different ways of saying the exact same thing. The 10th adds no substance whatsoever. Madison believed Article 1, Section 8 would be a successful expression of limited powers. Unfortunately for us, Article 1, Section 8 failed. "Implied Powers" doctrine was applied as early as the Washington administration, over Madison's objection.
15 posted on 12/29/2009 7:12:03 AM PST by Huck (The Constitution is an outrageous insult to the men who fought the Revolution." -Patrick Henry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Def Conservative

Can this be given legs?


16 posted on 12/29/2009 7:35:50 AM PST by jimfree (In 2012 Sarah Palin will continue to have more relevant quality executive experience than B. Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Def Conservative
HMMMMMMMMM... let's see. Being represented by Dodd the Criminal or the TSA treating me like a criminal. Tough call. I dislike them both.


17 posted on 12/29/2009 9:31:17 AM PST by Daffynition (What's all this about hellfire and Dalmatians?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 12Gauge687

Believe me, I’ve been on this track for more than twenty years.


18 posted on 12/29/2009 9:44:44 AM PST by MozarkDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: MozarkDawg

bump


19 posted on 12/29/2009 10:05:00 AM PST by dangerdoc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Huck
The 10th amendment is completely worthless.

The point of my comment was the intent of the 10th Amendment, not to discuss its' validity or usefulness. The entire Constitution is and has been being ignored to the point where it is almost irrelevant for nigh onto 200 years.....but that practice has more to do with an ignorant and apathetic electorate than it does the words contained within the document itself.....

20 posted on 12/31/2009 8:28:09 AM PST by Thermalseeker (Stop the insanity - Flush Congress!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Thermalseeker
The point of my comment was the intent of the 10th Amendment, not to discuss its' validity or usefulness.

Fair enough. I just hate to see people place their hopes on a toothless, substance-less amendment.

21 posted on 12/31/2009 9:31:26 AM PST by Huck (The Constitution is an outrageous insult to the men who fought the Revolution." -Patrick Henry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson