Must be dancing hamster time
Posted on 12/30/2009 1:32:39 PM PST by Colofornian
Nope - you made an objective claim that 'life' is part of the Einstein theory of realtivity. My only question so far has been for objective proof of that claim - via recognized journals or works. Until I view proof of that claim - your definitions are baseless and not worthy of respectable comment. It is evident again from this post that no objective support is in existance.
You seem to have some weird definition of life and it is pointless to try and point out what you haven't defined.
*tsk * tsk * tsk - it is mind reading to assign to me that I have a 'weird definition' when I have yet to make my definition known. Again, the point of the discussion has been my request for your scientific sources (aka journals, articles, etc) which provide this definition of 'life' being in the relativity equation.
After you have done your assessment (I am assuming you know how to google), then provide your definition and get back to me.
Lurkers will note that this again that this is another failure to produce simple, objective and external documentation for the claim that 'life' is a variable within Einstein's Theory of Relativity. With repeated refusal to provide such source documentation, the likelyhood that it really exists continues to decrease in proportion to the protestations to the contrary.
Again, just a real simple question - that's all I've been asking - point me to your source material.
Simple test:
Hook a car battery (energy) to a fresh steaming pile of horse crap (matter).
If the horse crap hops up, screams and runs away, our buddy wins.
A while back, this arrogant, self-absorbed poster was spewing off about how well versed he was in the Bible and B of M, so much so that he asserted to knowing more about the Bible than those ‘attacking Mormonism’. It didn’t take lonf for a post where he asserted a Biblical issue and was profoundly in error on the actual characters’ names! Noise from this arrogant ass is usually just flatulence.
No, I didn't.
Duuuude...
Posts 156, 199, 204 and 225 for starters, unless you've asked the mod to pull those posts. :)
Indeed!
Must be dancing hamster time
I’m stealing that graphic too. lol.
They aren't pulled. Please quote the salient parts, or admit that you are wrong : )
They aren't pulled. Please quote the salient parts, or admit that you are wrong : ) [LG]
Oh THIS is going to be fun.
I have seen blatant “reversals” and “denials” (read: lies) but man...
Wow...
#156 - "This is actually the more interesting part and confirmed by Einstein, light, life and matter are one and the same.
#199 - "Hmm, I gave you . . . and Einstein's equations. . . . You may want to start with Feyman's chapter on the Special Theory of Relativity.
#204 - "What part of life is matter and energy don't you get?
#225 - (GZ)"I have only asked one question, not 20, and that is to point me to the scientific journals/articles/books that specifically link “life” to Einstein’s relativity equation."
(LG) "And I replied by asking you what is different in 'life' to make Einsteins equation not applicable to it? "
Son, you can easily go back, just as I did and see that my question was specifically asking for scientific references supporting your incorporation of 'life' into Einstein's theory. You are computer saavy enough.
I await you acknowledgement and apology. And even more - I still await what scientific journal/article, etc that makes this claim that you've appropriated for yourself.
Theft?
Most was abandoned when the ill-advised handcart compaines left.
Extermination?
Yeah; THAT worked really well; cvonsidering that the Rlds folks stayed behind and prospered there, and ended up with the good PROPERTIES.
you win.
game, set and match to Godzilla.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.