Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

It Didn't Start With Climategate (IPPC peer reviewed docs changed after peer review)
Powerline ^ | 1/1/10 | Powerline

Posted on 01/02/2010 8:52:47 AM PST by Titus-Maximus

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last
It's amazing the climate underworld has gotten away with this, nothing these people say is believable. A new scientific study, with new data and new people in a totally transparent process has to be enacted - these people are corrupt.

If these were pharmaceutical scientists behaving this way in an FDA process they would all be in jail.

1 posted on 01/02/2010 8:52:47 AM PST by Titus-Maximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Titus-Maximus

Ping


2 posted on 01/02/2010 9:00:00 AM PST by Jack Black
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Titus-Maximus

I have advocated jail for these corrupt scientists for a long time!


3 posted on 01/02/2010 9:02:21 AM PST by Cold Heart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Titus-Maximus

It’s about time to chase down Al Gore with pitchforks and torches. I have yet to determine whether he is extremely smart or stupid.
But I have determined he is extremely sleazy.


4 posted on 01/02/2010 9:02:56 AM PST by donhunt (No one wants to see GMs new convertible, the Pelosi, with its top down!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Titus-Maximus

“If these were pharmaceutical scientists behaving this way in an FDA process they would all be in jail.”

i wonder about even that, now days......


5 posted on 01/02/2010 9:03:31 AM PST by mreerm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Titus-Maximus

what do you suppose Professor Santer’s motivation was/is?


6 posted on 01/02/2010 9:06:00 AM PST by mreerm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mreerm

sorry...

what do you suppose Professor Santer’s motivation/agenda was/is?


7 posted on 01/02/2010 9:07:02 AM PST by mreerm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Titus-Maximus

The authorities are in on this. It would take concerted vigilantism to punish the miscreants and to set an example.


8 posted on 01/02/2010 9:08:22 AM PST by qwertypie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Titus-Maximus

What a bunch of crap this AGW BS has been, and really all too many have known it for so long including those pushing it.

Obama and his mob buddies in Chicago with their Carbon Exchange, the Fellow that wormed his way into a position with Wickipedia to “adjust” the data over years of time, the person indicated in this article, and of course Climate-Gate.

There really isn’t any reason this hoax, this ruse should be able to continue costing the World Billions and Billions of dollars for the benefit of a few lousey crooks.


9 posted on 01/02/2010 9:13:20 AM PST by rockinqsranch (Dems, Libs, Socialists...Call 'em What you Will, They ALL have Fairies Living In Their Trees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Titus-Maximus

Among the key lines in the original article:

‘...the late Professor Frederick Seitz ... noted that, before printing, key phrases had been deleted from the draft that had earlier been approved by its several scientist-authors.

‘The following passages are examples of those included in the approved report but deleted from the supposedly peer-reviewed published version:

’ “None of the studies cited above has shown clear evidence that we can attribute the observed [climate] changes to the specific cause of increases in greenhouse gases.” “No study to date has positively attributed all or part [of the climate change observed to date] to anthropogenic [man-made] causes.” “Any claims of positive detection of significant climate change are likely to remain controversial until uncertainties in the total natural variability of the climate system are reduced.” ‘

Seitz was one of the earliest skeptics to question this whole scam, and was a true hero in his opposition - it’s a shame he’s not around to see how it’s been exposed with the CRU papers.


10 posted on 01/02/2010 9:14:04 AM PST by Stosh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rockinqsranch

“There really isn’t any reason this hoax, this ruse should be able to continue...”

On second thought there is reason the hoax, the ruse continues. THEY are our current lot of leaders.


11 posted on 01/02/2010 9:18:39 AM PST by rockinqsranch (Dems, Libs, Socialists...Call 'em What you Will, They ALL have Fairies Living In Their Trees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Titus-Maximus
There must be lots of people involved in paleoclimatology and related fields who knew about these manipulations , 13 years ago. Was there any whistle-blowing then? Or did they all duck their heads down and mutter, "Not my job, boss"?
12 posted on 01/02/2010 9:31:32 AM PST by Mrs. Don-o (Mammalia Primatia Hominidae Homo sapiens. Still working on the "sapiens" part.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Titus-Maximus

Their number one evangelist: AlGore! And he is laughing all the way to the bank!


13 posted on 01/02/2010 9:32:15 AM PST by LiteKeeper (When do the impeachment proceedings begin?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Titus-Maximus

Powerline does it again. This might be said to be old news—about 15 years old, in fact. But it all slipped under the radar at the time.

I thought the Kyoto Treaty business was bogus from the start, but I missed these articles revealing that outright fraud was involved in the “editing” process.

And, yes, there’s no question that this is CRIMINAL FRAUD, undertanken for the obvious purpose of enriching and empowering the perps. Someone should charge all these people under the RICO act. But of course that’s unlikely as long as their political enablers are in power in Washington and the other western capitals.


14 posted on 01/02/2010 9:41:00 AM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Titus-Maximus
PC is so powerful that even in the scientific community fudging, hiding, manipulating, distorting the data will not get you expelled.

In any other scientific community such actions would be cause for you to be permanently disgraced and FIRED.

We are living in the MATRIX were we can no longer believe ANYONE especially if they are in the government or media.

The only thing missing are the pods and all the hoses connected to our bodies. Instead of being used for energy we are all simply cows to be milked for cash to fund the ruling elite in the world. When they have drained the cash from us, the death panels will determine our fate.

15 posted on 01/02/2010 9:54:39 AM PST by Wurlitzer (Welcome to the new USSA (United Socialist States of Amerika))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Titus-Maximus; FreedomPoster; carolinablonde; proud_yank; bamahead; Normandy; SteamShovel; ...
 


ClimateGate


16 posted on 01/02/2010 9:59:15 AM PST by steelyourfaith (Freedom from fat cat greedy Big Government tyranny IS a Right ... It IS the Constitution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mrs. Don-o
"There must be lots of people involved in paleoclimatology and related fields who knew about these manipulations , 13 years ago. Was there any whistle-blowing then? Or did they all duck their heads down and mutter, "Not my job, boss"? "

It's all about money. Those that went along remained gainfully employed and got grant after grant. Those few that did speak up were shouted down and/or hounded out of the field of study. A brave few (too few) persevered in the face of this.

17 posted on 01/02/2010 10:03:30 AM PST by SW6906 (6 things you can't have too much of: sex, money, firewood, horsepower, guns and ammunition.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Wurlitzer

Wow. You may be spot on.


18 posted on 01/02/2010 10:04:31 AM PST by SW6906 (6 things you can't have too much of: sex, money, firewood, horsepower, guns and ammunition.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Titus-Maximus

I remember reading about the IPCC changing the conclusions on the second report more than ten years ago and very few paid attention and nobody listened.

Back in my college days in the 80’s when the global ice age rhetoric switched almost overnight to global warming, we all knew it was BS. The cynical ones among us saw the opportunity for socialism and the rest of us were ignored.


19 posted on 01/02/2010 10:43:36 AM PST by seowulf (Petraeus, cross the Rubicon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Titus-Maximus
"If these were pharmaceutical scientists behaving this way in an FDA process they would all be in jail."

That is the FDA process, except the FDA has more muscle to go after the skeptics.

20 posted on 01/02/2010 11:06:58 AM PST by UnwashedPeasant (Don't nuke me, bro)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson