Skip to comments.
Mom of 9 cries foul (Claim: I was sterilized against my will)
The Boston Herald ^
| 01/03/2010
| By Jessica Fargen
Posted on 01/03/2010 6:23:12 AM PST by Bluestateredman
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 next last
To: All
This is telling:
THIS IS MY BODY: Tessa SAVICKI, shown above in her Springfield home with children, from left, Destiny TIRADO, Jassalyn Tirado, Julian TORRES-LEBRON and Manuel FLORES is suing Baystate Medical Center
But she’s not jumping from guy to guy getting pregnant....
To: Bluestateredman
>>Savicki has nine children from several men, is unemployed and relies on public assistance for two of the four children
>>Its my choice
...to live off other people’s money.
>>Savicki acknowledged that some may feel little sympathy for her situation, but cautioned against public judgment because she is a poor, unmarried mother of 9.
I am sick to death of these feral humans saying “don’t be judgin’ me” and then expecting people to pay for their lifestyle choices. She needed a .22 caliber sterilization years ago.
>>I take care of my kids.
No. You. Don’t!
22
posted on
01/03/2010 6:54:56 AM PST
by
Bryanw92
(Imagine a day when the politicians have to hold a bake sale to pay for votes!)
To: Bluestateredman
Idiocracy in real life. - A second dark ages is coming soon.
23
posted on
01/03/2010 6:55:02 AM PST
by
gore_sux
(Al Franken - Preferred by Minnesota Educated Somali Pirates and Suicide Bombers Everywhere)
To: Bluestateredman
- No doctor should be able to autonomously make a decision to sterilize someone without their consent, unless medically necessary. That should take legislation and oversight by a judge. The woman should win her lawsuit, if she did not ask for this.
- Only 2 of her kids are on public assistance. Why only two? Is it something like Social Security Survivor Benefits, payable in the event of the death of a parent, regardless of income? If so, that's an entitlement, that I wouldn't call public assistance. That's a right, an insurance company payout, even if the government is the insurance company. How are the other kids fed? The woman claims to be taking care of them, maybe she is?
- If the woman has lymphoma, having more children is irresponsible.
- However, the Muslims would pop out little terrorists regardless of how poor and sad their sand flee bitten lives would be. And as long as the west has open borders to them, they'll never have an incentive to stop.
- Shades of "Idiocracy". The dumb multiply like rabbits, while the intelligent limit their reproduction, resulting in the degradation of the general human intelligence.
24
posted on
01/03/2010 6:58:01 AM PST
by
DannyTN
To: freebilly
“Three generations of imbeciles is enough” is a quote from supreme court justice Oliver Wendel Holmes Jr., upholding a Maryland statute allowing involuntary sterilization. Used by me in this instance ironically.
I agree, if the doctors arbitrarily decided to sterilize her, she has a case. I'd still like to see the facts. She may well have consented.
To: MAexile
Which is exactly how government health care will work.
26
posted on
01/03/2010 7:01:55 AM PST
by
Blood of Tyrants
(The Second Amendment. Don't MAKE me use it.)
To: SWAMPSNIPER
35 with a 21 year old child? So she was 13 when she started breeding?
27
posted on
01/03/2010 7:05:00 AM PST
by
Blood of Tyrants
(The Second Amendment. Don't MAKE me use it.)
To: Bluestateredman
This woman is going from tubal ligation to terrible litigation...
28
posted on
01/03/2010 7:15:44 AM PST
by
UCFRoadWarrior
(Merry Christmas and Happy New Year to all FReepers)
To: Bluestateredman
If a woman continues to have child after chld on welfare, there should be a law requiring her to be sterilized.
29
posted on
01/03/2010 7:19:39 AM PST
by
Thane_Banquo
(The GOP: The Big Tent with a Fifth Column.)
To: Bluestateredman
Let me help: white trash loser.
30
posted on
01/03/2010 7:21:31 AM PST
by
43north
(BHO: 50% white, 50% black, 100% red)
To: Bluestateredman
I agree with her that it is her "choice" to have as many babies as she wants. What I do not agree with is being made, via the cash stolen from me in the form of taxes, to be used to care for her or her children.
Scripture teaches us that if a man (or woman for that matter) doesn't work they do NOT eat. Simple. Her children are her responsibility. She should be made to take care of them. Should a child die due to her neglect she goes to jail and walla, no more bastard children being produced by her.
I'm sick of all this government involvement in family affairs. I love children with all my heart, I have four of my own, but I do not believe anyone has any business telling a parent how to care for and raise their children and I don't believe the general public should be forced to do so. Child protection services need to go the way of the dinosaur and leave the raising of children to those whom God has entrusted with their upbringing... THEIR PARENTS.
I know... Too simple and oh.... How cold eh?
31
posted on
01/03/2010 7:22:21 AM PST
by
The Anti-One
(So likewise ye, when ye shall see all these things, know that it is near, even at the doors.)
To: Bluestateredman
Unfortunately, just another drain on the system.
32
posted on
01/03/2010 7:25:12 AM PST
by
wolfcreek
(http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lsd7DGqVSIc)
To: Bluestateredman
The damnedest thing is after she wins a multi million dollar law suit, she will still receive welfare.
33
posted on
01/03/2010 7:29:27 AM PST
by
carolinacrazy
(Bow to your sensei.... BOW TO YOUR SENSEI...... www.jackassdemocrats.com)
To: Bluestateredman
The comments section of that article are less than sympathetic. The classic, though, was:
"Can't Feed Em -- Don't Breed Em,
If the Boston Herald liberals were trying to get support, they didn't get it from this article.
- Traveler
34
posted on
01/03/2010 7:34:32 AM PST
by
Traveler59
(Truth is a journey, not a destination.)
To: Blood of Tyrants; Bluestateredman
Which is exactly how government health care will work.
#############
If this is the case, I say that We The People have the right to ask our doctors, no, demand our doctors to tell us what provisions we are no longer allowed to have, & if the doctors have been put under government orders to sterilize, we sure as hell have a right to no about it.
....is Holdren lurking around the corner...
To: wolfcreek
Eh? The “system” shouldnt say whether she should be sterilized or not. She should. Im amazed at the attitudes shown here. The same people who say that death panels should not be allowed, are now saying, “Woo hoo, yeah! Shes an idiot. Sterilize her!”.
Anyway, if any of her kids grow up to be productive, good members of society, maybe a doctor, a soldier, a sailor, a teacher, whats wrong with it?
36
posted on
01/03/2010 7:36:14 AM PST
by
ketelone
To: Atom Smasher
no about it = know about it
Sorry!
To: Bluestateredman
I’m with you. There is so much wrong in this story it makes my head hurt.
To: Bluestateredman
No one has the right to say youve had enough.Yes we do if she is breeding children that everybody else has to pay for until they are adults. Some people will just not act responsibly, so society has the right to help them be responsible and not breed more welfare dependents.
39
posted on
01/03/2010 7:54:43 AM PST
by
Rapscallion
(They really did pledge their lives, fortunes, and sacred honor. How now?)
To: Bluestateredman
I would be in favor of sterilization as a condition for receiving welfare.
40
posted on
01/03/2010 8:01:16 AM PST
by
PapaBear3625
(Public healthcare looks like it will work as well as public housing did.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson