Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mom of 9 cries foul (Claim: I was sterilized against my will)
The Boston Herald ^ | 01/03/2010 | By Jessica Fargen

Posted on 01/03/2010 6:23:12 AM PST by Bluestateredman

Mom of 9 cries foul Claim: I was sterilized against my will By Jessica Fargen Sunday, January 3, 2010 - Updated 37m ago + Recent Articles + Recent Blog Entries + Email + Bio General Assignment Reporter Check out Jessica Fargen's Reporter's Notebook blog. E-mail Print (83) Comments Text size Share Buzz up!Post-delivery notes indicate she received a tubal ligation, the complaint says. The surgical notes were reviewed by the Herald.

This is the second time Savicki has sued over reproductive issues. In 2001, she reached a settlement with CVS and a spermacide company after she became pregnant with her now 12-year-old daughter after claiming she bought and used an expired spermacide, according to federal court documents.

Savicki has nine children from several men, is unemployed and relies on public assistance for two of the four children who live with her. She receives supplemental security income, or SSI, for a disability, non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma, she said. Her mother has custody of three of her children. Two of her children are no longer minors.

‘It’s my choice’

Savicki acknowledged that some may feel little sympathy for her situation, but cautioned against public judgment because she is a poor, unmarried mother of 9.

“I would never have the right to tell anyone else ‘because you have this many kids that’s enough,’ ” she said. “That’s no one’s right to say that. It’s my choice. No one has the right to say you’ve had enough.

“I take care of my kids. I love my kids. I was not ready to make that kind of decision,” she said of the permanent sterilization.

Savicki said her life has stabilized in the last decade after a rocky start. She had her first child at 13 and dropped out of high school in the ninth grade.

Savicki said she’s been in a relationship with her fiance, Angel Flores Tirado, 36, since she was 25. She lives with him and the couple’s three children. Tirado helps support the family with his full-time job as a personal care assistant. Savicki said she’s had eight of her nine children while in committed relationships and hoped for one more child with Tirado.

“It’s not like I’m jumping from guy to guy to guy to get pregnant,” she said. “I’m trying to make a healthy home for my children.”


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News
KEYWORDS: babymomma; ssi; welfare
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last
To: All

This is telling:

‘THIS IS MY BODY’: Tessa SAVICKI, shown above in her Springfield home with children, from left, Destiny TIRADO, Jassalyn Tirado, Julian TORRES-LEBRON and Manuel FLORES is suing Baystate Medical Center

But she’s not jumping from guy to guy getting pregnant....


21 posted on 01/03/2010 6:54:07 AM PST by Molon Labbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bluestateredman

>>Savicki has nine children from several men, is unemployed and relies on public assistance for two of the four children

>>‘It’s my choice’

...to live off other people’s money.

>>Savicki acknowledged that some may feel little sympathy for her situation, but cautioned against public judgment because she is a poor, unmarried mother of 9.

I am sick to death of these feral humans saying “don’t be judgin’ me” and then expecting people to pay for their lifestyle choices. She needed a .22 caliber sterilization years ago.

>>“I take care of my kids.

No. You. Don’t!


22 posted on 01/03/2010 6:54:56 AM PST by Bryanw92 (Imagine a day when the politicians have to hold a bake sale to pay for votes!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bluestateredman

Idiocracy in real life. - A second dark ages is coming soon.


23 posted on 01/03/2010 6:55:02 AM PST by gore_sux (Al Franken - Preferred by Minnesota Educated Somali Pirates and Suicide Bombers Everywhere)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bluestateredman
  1. No doctor should be able to autonomously make a decision to sterilize someone without their consent, unless medically necessary. That should take legislation and oversight by a judge. The woman should win her lawsuit, if she did not ask for this.
  2. Only 2 of her kids are on public assistance. Why only two? Is it something like Social Security Survivor Benefits, payable in the event of the death of a parent, regardless of income? If so, that's an entitlement, that I wouldn't call public assistance. That's a right, an insurance company payout, even if the government is the insurance company. How are the other kids fed? The woman claims to be taking care of them, maybe she is?
  3. If the woman has lymphoma, having more children is irresponsible.
  4. However, the Muslims would pop out little terrorists regardless of how poor and sad their sand flee bitten lives would be. And as long as the west has open borders to them, they'll never have an incentive to stop.
  5. Shades of "Idiocracy". The dumb multiply like rabbits, while the intelligent limit their reproduction, resulting in the degradation of the general human intelligence.

24 posted on 01/03/2010 6:58:01 AM PST by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freebilly
“Three generations of imbeciles is enough” is a quote from supreme court justice Oliver Wendel Holmes Jr., upholding a Maryland statute allowing involuntary sterilization. Used by me in this instance ironically.

I agree, if the doctors arbitrarily decided to sterilize her, she has a case. I'd still like to see the facts. She may well have consented.

25 posted on 01/03/2010 7:01:55 AM PST by Lonesome in Massachussets (The CRU needs adult supervision.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: MAexile

Which is exactly how government health care will work.


26 posted on 01/03/2010 7:01:55 AM PST by Blood of Tyrants (The Second Amendment. Don't MAKE me use it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SWAMPSNIPER

35 with a 21 year old child? So she was 13 when she started breeding?


27 posted on 01/03/2010 7:05:00 AM PST by Blood of Tyrants (The Second Amendment. Don't MAKE me use it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Bluestateredman

This woman is going from tubal ligation to terrible litigation...


28 posted on 01/03/2010 7:15:44 AM PST by UCFRoadWarrior (Merry Christmas and Happy New Year to all FReepers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bluestateredman

If a woman continues to have child after chld on welfare, there should be a law requiring her to be sterilized.


29 posted on 01/03/2010 7:19:39 AM PST by Thane_Banquo (The GOP: The Big Tent with a Fifth Column.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bluestateredman

Let me help: white trash loser.


30 posted on 01/03/2010 7:21:31 AM PST by 43north (BHO: 50% white, 50% black, 100% red)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bluestateredman
I agree with her that it is her "choice" to have as many babies as she wants. What I do not agree with is being made, via the cash stolen from me in the form of taxes, to be used to care for her or her children.
Scripture teaches us that if a man (or woman for that matter) doesn't work they do NOT eat. Simple. Her children are her responsibility. She should be made to take care of them. Should a child die due to her neglect she goes to jail and walla, no more bastard children being produced by her.

I'm sick of all this government involvement in family affairs. I love children with all my heart, I have four of my own, but I do not believe anyone has any business telling a parent how to care for and raise their children and I don't believe the general public should be forced to do so. Child protection services need to go the way of the dinosaur and leave the raising of children to those whom God has entrusted with their upbringing... THEIR PARENTS.

I know... Too simple and oh.... How cold eh?

31 posted on 01/03/2010 7:22:21 AM PST by The Anti-One (So likewise ye, when ye shall see all these things, know that it is near, even at the doors.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bluestateredman
Unfortunately, just another drain on the system.
32 posted on 01/03/2010 7:25:12 AM PST by wolfcreek (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Lsd7DGqVSIc)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bluestateredman
The damnedest thing is after she wins a multi million dollar law suit, she will still receive welfare.
33 posted on 01/03/2010 7:29:27 AM PST by carolinacrazy (Bow to your sensei.... BOW TO YOUR SENSEI...... www.jackassdemocrats.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bluestateredman
The comments section of that article are less than sympathetic. The classic, though, was:

"Can't Feed Em -- Don't Breed Em,

If the Boston Herald liberals were trying to get support, they didn't get it from this article.

- Traveler

34 posted on 01/03/2010 7:34:32 AM PST by Traveler59 (Truth is a journey, not a destination.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants; Bluestateredman

Which is exactly how government health care will work.

#############

If this is the case, I say that We The People have the right to ask our doctors, no, demand our doctors to tell us what provisions we are no longer allowed to have, & if the doctors have been put under government orders to sterilize, we sure as hell have a right to no about it.

....is Holdren lurking around the corner...


35 posted on 01/03/2010 7:34:52 AM PST by Atom Smasher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: wolfcreek

Eh? The “system” shouldnt say whether she should be sterilized or not. She should. Im amazed at the attitudes shown here. The same people who say that death panels should not be allowed, are now saying, “Woo hoo, yeah! Shes an idiot. Sterilize her!”.

Anyway, if any of her kids grow up to be productive, good members of society, maybe a doctor, a soldier, a sailor, a teacher, whats wrong with it?


36 posted on 01/03/2010 7:36:14 AM PST by ketelone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Atom Smasher

no about it = know about it

Sorry!


37 posted on 01/03/2010 7:37:35 AM PST by Atom Smasher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Bluestateredman

I’m with you. There is so much wrong in this story it makes my head hurt.


38 posted on 01/03/2010 7:44:13 AM PST by CastleMan95
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bluestateredman
No one has the right to say you’ve had enough.

Yes we do if she is breeding children that everybody else has to pay for until they are adults. Some people will just not act responsibly, so society has the right to help them be responsible and not breed more welfare dependents.

39 posted on 01/03/2010 7:54:43 AM PST by Rapscallion (They really did pledge their lives, fortunes, and sacred honor. How now?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bluestateredman

I would be in favor of sterilization as a condition for receiving welfare.


40 posted on 01/03/2010 8:01:16 AM PST by PapaBear3625 (Public healthcare looks like it will work as well as public housing did.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson