To: proud_yank
Science tends to be non political except in the voodoo sciences like today’s climatology. So why, normally, should a liberal care for science.
26 posted on
01/03/2010 11:36:09 PM PST by
HiTech RedNeck
(I am in America but not of America (per bible: am in the world but not of it))
To: HiTech RedNeck
So why, normally, should a liberal care for science. Why, when it's so Eurocentric, so linear and all? How many on any given school board in the country, let alone Berkeley, have a Bachelor of Science degree?
Todays topic: Why Leroy can't solve acid-reduction equations.
To: HiTech RedNeck
Science tends to be non political except in the voodoo sciences like todays climatology. So why, normally, should a liberal care for science.
People in scientific fields still have their views and tend to express them, many of my profs did, though they're usually not going to be as radical as profs in depts such as humanities. My point was that the science/technical side of UC Berkeley is esteemed and well-recognized, and they may offer opposition to what is being proposed in Berkeley schools.
33 posted on
01/04/2010 12:31:20 AM PST by
proud_yank
(Socialism - An Answer In Search Of A Question For Over 100 Years)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson