Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PA-RIVER
Rest assured, You are not alone in belittling Americans who know the law by calling them “birthers”.

On the contrary, I'm belittling Birthers who don't know the law.

The truth remains: He is the first to assume the presidency, after the founders, with numerous claims to citizenship rights to multiple countries. The NBC clause is there to stop this exact situation.

Ah if you could only point to where the Constitution defines natural-born citizen in a way which supports your position.

74 posted on 01/11/2010 12:13:51 PM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]


To: Non-Sequitur

Common sense defines it. He was born on United States soil (let’s assume) the son of a father who was at all times a UK/Kenyan citizen.


75 posted on 01/11/2010 12:30:04 PM PST by Genoa (Luke 12:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]

To: Non-Sequitur
A debate with you, Non-Sqequter, is like a debate with Bill Clinton.

The meaning of “Is” is subject to interpretation. “Arms” is not defined in the constitution, therefore congress can out law guns and must not regulate T-shirts.

Natural born Citizen is not defined, therefore A British born Subject can run for president.

When the terms of language are set upon quicksand as you insist, there is no constitution. There is no law. There is no justice. People then set the rules on their own terms with their own instruments of justice, as they must, as they are forced to.

80 posted on 01/11/2010 1:06:00 PM PST by PA-RIVER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson