Skip to comments.
Possible Space Wars In The Near Future
RIA Novosti/Space War ^
| 1/18/2010
| by Ilya Kramnik
Posted on 01/17/2010 8:42:29 PM PST by ErnstStavroBlofeld
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
To: sonofstrangelove
You could pretty well cut a country off from space through the simple expedient of launching a large barrel of finishing nails into orbit then exploding it.
Those nails whizzing around at 15,000 MPH (or thereabouts ~ whatever it takes) would have a very high probability of ELIMINATING any more space launches until someone figured out how to build "space armor" or a tactical "space take out" laser of some kind.
No doubt everybody is ready to launch a barrel or two of nails on warning.
Our current level of penetration into space is going to be shortlived.
2
posted on
01/17/2010 8:47:31 PM PST
by
muawiyah
("Git Out The Way")
Although the exact name of the missile is not known, sources mentioned a KT-1/SC-19 system described as being based on a modified DF-21 medium-range ballistic missile or its commercial derivative, the KT-2, with a kinetic kill vehicle mounted. The 11-meter DF-21 missile weighs 15 metric tons.
3
posted on
01/17/2010 8:51:02 PM PST
by
ErnstStavroBlofeld
("I have learned to use the word "impossible" with the greatest caution."-Dr.Werner Von Braun)
To: sonofstrangelove
The U.S. media suspects// How am I supposed to believe THE U.S. MEDIA??????I'm just sayin'
4
posted on
01/17/2010 9:05:16 PM PST
by
ColdOne
(:^))
To: sonofstrangelove
The main objective of American foreign policy in the early third millenium ought to be to build an alliance with India, Japan, the UK (and any others truly willing) to build a coalition for civilization.
5
posted on
01/17/2010 9:07:10 PM PST
by
dodger
To: sonofstrangelove
Sooner or later it’ll happen. I say sooner.
6
posted on
01/17/2010 9:09:02 PM PST
by
oneolcop
(Lead, Follow or Get the Hell Out of the Way!)
To: dodger
I would include South Korea and Taiwan in that list.
7
posted on
01/17/2010 9:09:06 PM PST
by
ErnstStavroBlofeld
("I have learned to use the word "impossible" with the greatest caution."-Dr.Werner Von Braun)
To: sonofstrangelove
thanks, for the information / thread / post.
8
posted on
01/17/2010 9:09:26 PM PST
by
skinkinthegrass
(Zer0 to the voters: "Here's my DeathCARE Plan"...now....just die (quicky), please. :^)
To: skinkinthegrass
9
posted on
01/17/2010 9:10:20 PM PST
by
ErnstStavroBlofeld
("I have learned to use the word "impossible" with the greatest caution."-Dr.Werner Von Braun)
To: sonofstrangelove
I thought all this was rendered moot by particle beams?
To: Lancey Howard
I thought all this was rendered moot by particle beams? Do you know of working, deployable particle beam weapons?
11
posted on
01/17/2010 9:16:47 PM PST
by
TChris
("Hello", the politician lied.)
To: sonofstrangelove
I would include South Korea and Taiwan in that list.
Indeed!
12
posted on
01/17/2010 9:17:25 PM PST
by
dodger
To: oneolcop
Sooner or later itll happen.As I understand it, there's serious concern that this could happen spontaneously from a runaway cascade of collisions. This came up when the Chinese did their "test" and pushed us that much closer to it.
13
posted on
01/17/2010 9:19:07 PM PST
by
dr_lew
To: muawiyah
At orbital speeds styrofoam prills would be just as lethal, but would eventually evaporate in sunlight.
14
posted on
01/17/2010 9:30:43 PM PST
by
null and void
(We are now in day 361 of our national holiday from reality. - 0bama really isn't one of US.)
To: sonofstrangelove
The issue with such a space war would be that the moment several satellites were destroyed there would be so much debris whizzing about that the satellites of the aggressor (and since for now it is only the US, Russia, China and - soon - India that have the ASAT weapons they do have satellites of their own) would also be damaged. It is a form of limited MAD. However, in the event of a conventional (or other) war where the weaker state knows it is about to lose anyways, it may decide sacrificing its satellite core is a justifiable cost if it means taking out the satellite capability of the stronger foe. Thus, future space wars will most likely either be extremely limited (if at that even ....just demonstrating you have the capacity if sufficient, just as nuclear weapons simply require demonstrated capacity) whereby maybe one or two satellites are removed, or if it happens full bore then it will be in a situation where the weaker state believes it has crossed a certain loss-point and it doesn't matter any more.
Obviously, if 'softer' kill methods bear fruit (e.g. like the dazzling lasers and other methods being worked on that do not require a hard kill vehicle) then it changes the situation, since satellites can then be taken out without necessarily compromising your own satellites with thousands upon thousands of whizzing hyper-sonic bullets.
15
posted on
01/17/2010 9:40:38 PM PST
by
spetznaz
(Nuclear-tipped Ballistic Missiles: The Ultimate Phallic Symbol)
To: TChris
Do you know of working, deployable particle beam weapons?Do I need to?
We used atomic bombs in war nearly 60 years ago... People have been playing their music at home and in their cars with laser beams for over 20 years. I also remember reading about submarines using ultra-low radio frequencies over 20 years ago.
How smart do you have to be to figure out that new weapons systems have been developed during the past 65 years, and that using particle beams to blow things out of the sky or space is a likely design?
Of course, by now even those things might be considered antiques to the black ops people.
To: TChris
We used atomic bombs in war nearly 60 years agoOops. That was supposed to be nearly 65 years ago...
To: Lancey Howard
That's what I thought: Pure speculation.
But thanks for playing.
18
posted on
01/17/2010 9:50:22 PM PST
by
TChris
("Hello", the politician lied.)
To: TChris
LOL, tell that to Clancey!
You’re a real font of imagination, aren’t you?
Do yourself a favor - - keep your day job.
To: Lancey Howard
Youre a real font of imagination, arent you?dkq abc xyzwer
20
posted on
01/17/2010 10:35:01 PM PST
by
dr_lew
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-25 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson