Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

ARIZONA: NRA WINS RIGHT TO DEFEND HUNTERS AGAINST LAWSUIT SEEKING TO BAN LEAD AMMUNITION
NRA - ILA ^ | January 15, 2010 | NA

Posted on 01/18/2010 12:23:29 PM PST by neverdem


·11250 Waples Mill Road ·   Fairfax, Virginia 22030    ·800-392-8683

 
ARIZONA: NRA WINS RIGHT TO DEFEND HUNTERS AGAINST LAWSUIT SEEKING TO BAN LEAD AMMUNITION
 
Friday, January 15, 2010
 

Phoenix, Az. - Judge Paul G. Rosenblatt has ruled that the NRA has a right under federal law to intervene in a lawsuit filed, in the plaintiff’s own words, as part of a campaign “to ban the use of lead bullets[.]” NRA will now be able to defend hunter’s rights against the claims of extremist environmental groups that filed the lawsuit.

The lawsuit, filed January 27, 2009, by the Center for Biological Diversity (CBD), alleges that the U.S. Bureau of Land Management and the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service (BLM, FWS) are illegally mismanaging federal lands in Arizona. CBD’s lawsuit claims that California condors in Arizona are becoming ill or dying as a result of eating lead in scavenged game shot by hunters using lead shot or bullets.  Based on that claim, CBD contends BLM and FWS are violating the Endangered Species Act by allowing hunters to use lead shot and bullets in areas where California condors may feed.  CBD also contends BLM and FWS violated federal law by making land management decisions without considering the potential impact on local wildlife that supposedly results from authorized activities like off-road vehicle use and livestock grazing.

The Judge’s ruling addresses each of the requirements for intervention “as of right,” citing evidence that plainly shows NRA has a right to become a party to CBD’s lawsuit to protect the right to hunt in the area.  Specifically, Judge Rosenblatt held that NRA has a “significantly protectable interest . . . in protecting hunting rights[;]” intervention of right cannot occur unless this type of interest is established.   The Judge also held that the resolution of CBD’s lawsuit may impair NRA’s ability to protect its interest in protecting hunting, noting NRA’s contention that CBD’s lawsuit could result in an injunction or settlement that restricts the use of lead-based ammunition.  Finally, the Judge confirmed that current defendants to CBD’s lawsuit (BLM, FWS) do not adequately represent NRA, stating that “[t]he NRA is focused on the hunting aspect and protecting its members’ rights and all hunters’ rights to hunt with lead ammunition . . . .  This is not the objective of the current Defendants.”  

NRA is especially interested in defending against CBD’s lawsuit because California condors were introduced to Arizona based in large part on express promises by FWS, among others, that the reintroduction  of condors would not be allowed to impact hunting.

Copies of the Court’s Order of January 13, 2009, and the filings upon which it is based, are posted at www.calgunlaws.com.



Find this item at: http://www.nraila.org/Legislation/Read.aspx?ID=5304


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: banglist; blm; cbd; fws; leadammunition; leadbullets; nra

1 posted on 01/18/2010 12:23:32 PM PST by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: neverdem
With no lead contamination problem in water at either Gettysburg or Verdun, it is indicative of their depravity that the leftists think they can make this case.
2 posted on 01/18/2010 12:36:36 PM PST by Carry_Okie (Islam offers three choices: surrender, fight, or die.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Flowing from Mexico though parts of AZ are BLM lands which are critical habitats for many species, and, of course, this area is overrun by illegals and smugglers. The devastation left behind has been well documented. The Center for Biodiversity has not once spoken of the damage to the environment by illegals, but, focuses its efforts on trying to close a nearby military base and destroying the second amendment with junk science. The Center for Biodiversity is a public pest and nothing more.


3 posted on 01/18/2010 12:59:07 PM PST by exbrit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: exbrit

The Center for Biodiversity is a public pest and nothing more.

I once thought the same as you. These folks are far more than pests. They are well funded loon bats who are well on their way to skruing our country.

Learned about these fine people about summer of 2002. How would you feel about the LoonBats closing the St, Lawrence Seaway, or perhaps the Appalachian Trail. These folks are for real. Google “Wildlands Project”. One of them has made it onto the A-SHEVILLE, NC city council.

Caddis the Younger


4 posted on 01/18/2010 1:32:06 PM PST by palmerizedCaddis (There is a place left on earth where some folks can still walk on water!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

We should switch to using tungsten bullets.

I hear they have tons of tungsten in Ft. Knox and in the basement of the Federal Reserve Bank that was coated with a layer of gold.

We could put it to good use now.


5 posted on 01/18/2010 6:02:31 PM PST by Chewbacca (My gun has killed less people than Vice Pres Biden's motorcade.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chewbacca

Tungsten carbide works for me. Still, it’s nice that there’s really no way they can keep us from casting or swaging our own.


6 posted on 08/27/2010 11:17:58 AM PDT by Trod Upon (Obama: Making the Carter malaise look good. Misery Index in 3...2...1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson