Skip to comments.
BREAKING:Phony robo calls tell voters Mass Citizens for Life is not supporting Brown
redmassgroup.com ^
| 1-19-10
| b "EaBo Clipper" Eno
Posted on 01/19/2010 12:34:32 PM PST by Justaham
Boston, MA (LifeNews.com) -- Behind in the polls to Republican Senate candidate Scott brown, supporters of pro-abortion candidate Martha Coakley have evidentially reached into their bag of dirty tricks. A Washington, D.C. based company is making calls to Massachusetts residents pretending to represent a prominent pro-life group. The calls, from 202-461-3441, a Washington number registered to a company called SOOH, claim to be from Massachusetts Citizens for Life.
The caller claims the pro-life group is opposing Scott brown because of his stance against the health care bill, but as MCFL president Anne Fox told LifeNews.com late Monday, the opposite is true.
"Pro-lifers are receiving phone calls from people claiming to be Massachusetts Citizens for Life. The callers say that MCFL is not supporting Scott Brown because of his position on health care," she said. "The truth is that Massachusetts Citizens for Life is supporting Brown because of his position on health care."
(Excerpt) Read more at redmassgroup.com ...
TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: braking; dirtytricks; ma2010; prolifevote; robocalls
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-25 last
To: mlizzy
Who should they support, then?
This guy is not consistently pro-life, but he seems to be more pro-life than the other candidates in the race.
He supports the conscience clause, opposes ESCR and opposes ObamaCare, which are important issues to pro-lifers.
George W. Bush was pro-abortion, too (he believes in legal abortion in the cases of rape or incest), but he was more pro-life than the alternatives.
21
posted on
01/19/2010 1:13:10 PM PST
by
B Knotts
(Calvin Coolidge Republican)
To: mlizzy
Agreed, mlizzy, and thank you for the great pro-life post.
22
posted on
01/19/2010 1:16:20 PM PST
by
Reagan Man
("In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem; government is the problem.")
To: B Knotts
Who should they support, then?
You, of course, have a valid point. I voted for GWB because for the most part he was pro-life. Unfortunately, many can't get by the rape and incest pregnancies. But Brown is for the *bulk* of abortions (and he's running on the Republican ticket!). So I can't really compare these two. I think I've already quoted Fr. Euteneuer on this thread but I'll do so again; he is a champion for the pro-life cause.
"We are reminded that even supposed political victories are temporary, and that the solution to these problems is not political, even if we have to keep up the political fight and our activist efforts," said Father Euteneuer. "We are called to prayer, fasting and conversion... only God can put a stop to the horror of abortion now."
Pray to end abortion!
23
posted on
01/19/2010 1:47:28 PM PST
by
mlizzy
("Do not wait for leaders; do it alone, person to person" --Mother Teresa.)
To: Reagan Man
Agreed, mlizzy, and thank you for the great
pro-life post.
Always nice to hear from you, Reagan Man.:)
24
posted on
01/19/2010 1:53:27 PM PST
by
mlizzy
("Do not wait for leaders; do it alone, person to person" --Mother Teresa.)
To: Jersey Republican Biker Chick
Again, I am sure there is some misunderstanding. This is advertised to be the most moral political party ever, after 8 years of GW Bush&. Tell me this is a mistake.
25
posted on
01/19/2010 2:28:56 PM PST
by
llevrok
(I speak with a Conservative dialect)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-25 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson