Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

"Birther" Whispering Campaign Inside the Democrat Party?
Self | HMV

Posted on 01/24/2010 4:52:57 PM PST by Hillary'sMoralVoid

It started out innocently in a conversation with a well-connected Democrat friend who is now-disillusioned Obama voter.

We were discussing the Massachusetts election, and I joked that I didn’t know if the Democrats could stand another three years under Obama. He fired back that he and several of his friends didn’t know if they could stand ONE more year under Obama.

I posited that the only way it could happen that fast is if you could get him out of office on something like an eligibility issue, and that I couldn’t imagine any Democrat would ever become a “birther”!

There was a silence for a few moments and then he confided that “one might surprised at what is being whispered about by disillusioned members at high levels in the party”. He cut the conversation off at that point and we reverted back to small talk.

This all sounded so not credible to me, but you can never underestimate the Democrats’ desire to stay in power. The more I pondered his words, the more intriguing and perhaps terrifying the outcomes became.

Consider this scenario, the Democrats actually let “birther” investigations to go forward, publicly condemning the Republicans for pushing the issues, while quietly not impeding or even facilitating them . Two outcomes can happen. Obama is proven eligible and the Republicans are embarrassed and fall from public grace. Obama retains power and Democrats regain some public confidence.

Should Obama be removed from office, it becomes the ultimate opportunity to play the race card, because the still-“conservative” Supreme Court would have to “conspire” with the "racist" Republicans to force Obama’s departure from office. Democrats could swear Obama’s innocence, a repeat of the Lewinsky defense, in which Bill Clinton came out more powerful politically. The Democrats could raise the race issue with the Republicans until the end of recorded time for removing the first Black President from office.

At the precipice of their political comeback, the Republicans could fall hard! A Democrat "Rope a Dope"?

Admittedly this is a shameless self post, maybe I’m reading more into this than was really there. If you disagree, flame away, pull the post, and tell me to take my meds and go to my room.


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: birthcertificate; birther; birthers; buyersremorse; certifigate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 201-216 next last
To: Hillary'sMoralVoid

I believe Dems at every level are looking for a way to cancel “The Conan Obama Show”. This means wouldn’t surprise me, but they need to be made to do their own dirty work on it.


81 posted on 01/24/2010 5:44:33 PM PST by Emmett McCarthy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: exnavy

As Limbaugh pointed out...we can’t even see his college transcripts....nothing about this guy....


82 posted on 01/24/2010 5:44:38 PM PST by Fawn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Carley

Rapid Urban Redevelopment, and the courts don’t even have to condemn property first.


83 posted on 01/24/2010 5:45:41 PM PST by arthurus ("If you don't believe in shooting abortionists, don't shoot an abortionist." -Ann C.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Fast Moving Angel

this is an amazing thread. I think if the power brokers were going after Obama, some other shoes would have to drop. Biden would have some kind of illness and require a replacement (Clinton, or a moderate like Bayh.) Obama would have to pick him or her. Pelosi is also toxic and would have to go. it is interesting to ponder what the legal solution for this would be...a special presidential election, a re-run of the previous election with a new candidate on either or both sides? Very fascinating. Very scary!


84 posted on 01/24/2010 5:47:19 PM PST by Hillary'sMoralVoid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Hillary'sMoralVoid

I’m not at all sure it would play out that way. Perhaps if the Republicans took over the house and senate in next fall’s elections, they could hold hearings on Obama’s birth problem.

But in the first place, it’s doubtful they will control the Senate that soon.

And in the second place, it’s the Dems who would want Obama out NOW, not the Republicans. They could afford to wait for another election in 2012, once they controlled enough seats to stop Obama from passing any more monster bills. Obama would take more and more flak for the bad economy, while the Republican party strengthened its position with the voters and the Dems got weaker and weaker.

For that reason, I think it would have to be a revolt among the Democrats in congress, throwing out Reid and Pelosi, installing more “moderate” leadership, and then calling for hearings. If necessary, they could start impeachment proceedings. But the Republicans would wait for the Dems to do it, IMHO. Why should they take the blame?


85 posted on 01/24/2010 5:48:10 PM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne

For the Left truth is only a tool and only for emergency use when all else fails.The problem is that when the pile of tools is emptied out on the floor that one tool is hard to find and harder to use.


86 posted on 01/24/2010 5:48:54 PM PST by arthurus ("If you don't believe in shooting abortionists, don't shoot an abortionist." -Ann C.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: sklar
The American people (remember Mass. Va. NJ.) would be furious at the media ..
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

I am furious with Fox and their yappers as well a Rush. These guys **KNOW** that their is something very wrong with Obama’s eligibility and the **deliberately** choose not to report it.

I will never trust them again. In fact, I often wonder if they are part of a paid and controlled opposition.

87 posted on 01/24/2010 5:49:32 PM PST by wintertime (Good ideas win! Why? Because people are not stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: wintertime

Clinton = Little Rock. ACORN = Founded in Little Rock. Obizmal = Lawyer and mentor to ACORN. Common denominators tell all.


88 posted on 01/24/2010 5:51:04 PM PST by IrishPennant (If you can accept losing, you can't win. ~ Vince Lombardi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
is that Shrillary! did not use it in the primary
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Think of it as mutually assured destruction. Obama has plenty of dirt on Hillary too.

89 posted on 01/24/2010 5:51:04 PM PST by wintertime (Good ideas win! Why? Because people are not stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: wintertime

Another Freeper freepmailed the same thought. OK...I guess you guys are prolly right.


90 posted on 01/24/2010 5:54:54 PM PST by Pharmboy (The Stone Age did not end because they ran out of stones...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: Hillary'sMoralVoid
I could see where something like this happen.

I mean, how else are the dems going to correct their great big ol' mistake and blame it on us?

91 posted on 01/24/2010 5:55:27 PM PST by CAluvdubya (Palin 2012...YOU BETCHA!.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Southack
Obama is the most dangerous. He is the only one who has cultivated his 'own' cult of personality; logo. . .messiahship. . (and he hopes soon; his own army) He wants his disciples to respond to the ONE. He claims a power; that the others cannot. America knows Biden the bumbler; Pelosi the rat; their intentions recognized for what they are. (Byrd - well, don't think we need to worry about him, in any event.)

These folks abuse power; but they do not fool anyone. Obama is not just a sorry excuse for an arrogant narcissism; he is a meglo-narcissist and a dangerous one.

92 posted on 01/24/2010 5:58:38 PM PST by cricket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: wintertime
I am furious with Fox and their yappers as well a Rush. These guys **KNOW** that their is something very wrong with Obama’s eligibility and the **deliberately** choose not to report it. I will never trust them again. In fact, I often wonder if they are part of a paid and controlled opposition.

I agree with you.

93 posted on 01/24/2010 6:00:27 PM PST by proudofthesouth (Liberals are mentally ill.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: Fast Moving Angel

I can imagine a democrat leaking the documents with the idea of taking down the entire bunch at the top including Obama, Biden, Pelosi and any who could have had in perpetrating this fraud on the public. When it is realized that Obama, assuming that he is ineligible, knew the truth and committed this fraud on the country, and was aided and abetted by Pelosi and others, the entire group will resign or simply be arrested and removed from office. If the democrats are smart, something doubtful at best, they’ll do it themselves so that they can have a hand in replacing him with one of their own, probably one a bit more moderate. It’s their only chance to hold onto power, given the mess we have currently.

I can also imagine that the people who backed Obama are now seeing him as a liability. He’ll be removed as he not only isn’t getting the job done, but his continuing presence may well lead back to those pulling his strings.


94 posted on 01/24/2010 6:00:54 PM PST by Marty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: Hillary'sMoralVoid

You are all dreaming improbably dreams. The Democrats will resist bad info to the end and will fight for Hussein to the end, at least until after this November. If it becomes apparent to them that Hussein will lose the 2012 election then after November this year they will start to distance themselves from him and various hopefuls will maneuver to make themselves alternatives for the primaries. The best in this scenario for them would be for him to do a Johnson and decline to run. It didn’t help them in 1968, either.


95 posted on 01/24/2010 6:03:14 PM PST by arthurus ("If you don't believe in shooting abortionists, don't shoot an abortionist." -Ann C.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sinanju

Among the folks I know here the “bruthas” only care that there be a “black man” in the White House. They don’t care so much about what he does or accomplishes. They see him as an Icon more than as an effective agent.


96 posted on 01/24/2010 6:05:27 PM PST by arthurus ("If you don't believe in shooting abortionists, don't shoot an abortionist." -Ann C.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Hillary'sMoralVoid

Intriguing, but not possible. We all know that he isn’t eligible simply because his father was a British citizen when Obama II was born, regardless of where he was born, but the ENTIRE DEMOCRATIC CAUCUS as well as most of the Republicans KNOW he is ineligible. The DNC along with Pelosi signed off on the Two different certifications (one sent to Hawaii with verbage about being a natural born citizen, and one sent to the other 49 states without that verbage). Hawaii made them put that in their cert. to cover their butt. The entire power structure has known all along. So to allow Obama to be sent packing, it would allow all of them to be thrown out for treason. I wish they could, but as had been said, they will do anything to stay in power, and allowing BHO to get the boot, they would be signing their own death certs.


97 posted on 01/24/2010 6:05:36 PM PST by raymcc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hillary'sMoralVoid

Totally uncharted waters.

Hussein being proven ineligible is way different from simply resigning or being removed from office by impeachment.

The implications for everyone and the Republic are unpredictable to say the least.

I can this this with certainty. No matter what happened, the Dems would [attempt to] play the race card. And the RINOs would valiantly try to turn victory into defeat.


98 posted on 01/24/2010 6:06:06 PM PST by ChildOfThe60s (If you can remember the 60s, you weren't really there.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sklar
Why did Nancy Pelosi and other party leaders SIGN a document verifying his elegibility

Not only could we get rid of him; Nancy Pelosi would have to be prosecuted for committing fraud. We might be able to get rid of both of them.

99 posted on 01/24/2010 6:07:18 PM PST by Red Boots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Poincare

How can we be sure that he even attended some of the schools he claims” His records are “unavailable” and, at Columbia at least. none of his contemporaries have any memories of him.


100 posted on 01/24/2010 6:09:47 PM PST by arthurus ("If you don't believe in shooting abortionists, don't shoot an abortionist." -Ann C.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 201-216 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson