Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

U.S. refinery rate drop shows crisis in downstream
Reuters via Calgary Herald ^ | Jan 21, 2010 | Joshua Schneyer and Rebekah Kebede

Posted on 01/24/2010 5:13:42 PM PST by thackney

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

1 posted on 01/24/2010 5:13:42 PM PST by thackney
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: thackney

I wonder how long it would take Valero to turn on their Delaware plant?


2 posted on 01/24/2010 5:17:16 PM PST by MSF BU (++)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MSF BU
Long time. Serious POS. But they will try and bust the union before it starts again - if it ever does.
3 posted on 01/24/2010 5:20:15 PM PST by mad_as_he$$ (usff.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mad_as_he$$

Long time as in months or years? There are nonunion models where everybody seems happy. Exxon and Nucor come to mind. I have no clue if this is even conceivable in Delaware. I guess that is why Toyota and Honda build cars far away from Detroit.


4 posted on 01/24/2010 5:22:03 PM PST by MSF BU (++)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: MSF BU

I think someone else will be turning it on.

Valero in talks to sell Delaware refinery
http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/ap/business/6831215.html
Jan. 22, 2010, 6:53PM


5 posted on 01/24/2010 5:26:01 PM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: thackney

Is this saying that the existing refineries are under-utilized?
I had been thinking we did not have enough refining capacity.


6 posted on 01/24/2010 5:28:02 PM PST by Repeal The 17th (I AM JIM THOMPSON!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MSF BU
I wonder how long it would take Valero to turn on their Delaware plant?

Valero Energy Corporation announced Friday it is negotiating the sale of its Delaware City assets to PBF Investments, LLC., a company formed by Europe's largest independent refiner Petroplus

Petroplus is acquiring failed US refineries - not sure what the reason is.

7 posted on 01/24/2010 5:28:30 PM PST by Abby4116
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Repeal The 17th
From the point of view of the energy companies this is bad news. From the consumer standpoint, it is good news. It means we have excess capacity whereas before we were stretched to the limit. Less demand in a down economy also works against rises in price.
8 posted on 01/24/2010 5:32:24 PM PST by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Abby4116

About Petroplus
Petroplus International B. V. (Petroplus) was established in 1993 and has since developed into a leading player in the European refining market. Petroplus owns refineries in Antwerp, Belgium; Cressier, Switzerland and Teesside, United Kingdom. In addition, Petroplus recently announced the acquisition of the Belgian Refining Corporation, whose principle asset is a 120,000 barrel per day refinery in Antwerp, Belgium. This acquisition will result in an increase in Petroplus’s refining capacity to 355,000 barrels per day.

Petroplus is currently a wholly owned subsidiary of RIVR Acquistions B.V. RIVR will continue to develop its fast-growing 4Gas LNG terminalling and LNG marketing business which will be formally separated from and managed independently of Petroplus going forward. RIVR Acquisitions B.V., the parent company of Petroplus International B.V., is owned by funds and entities affiliated with Riverstone Holdings, The Carlyle Group, and Company management.


9 posted on 01/24/2010 5:33:30 PM PST by Buchal ("Two wings of the same bird of prey . . .")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Buchal
But if the reason given for closing Delaware City is correct, there isn't the demand for home heating oil and I find it hard to believe that the demand is going to increase in the near future.
10 posted on 01/24/2010 5:38:08 PM PST by Abby4116
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Repeal The 17th

To: thackney
Is this saying that the existing refineries are under-utilized?
I had been thinking we did not have enough refining capacity


We were being told we did not have enough refining capacity......


11 posted on 01/24/2010 5:39:59 PM PST by Freddd (CNN is not credible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Repeal The 17th
I had been thinking we did not have enough refining capacity.

We didn't. But, come the recession, demand fell like a stone.

Refineries are high capital operations that need to run at a high percentage of capacity to be profitable. But pushing them into the 97-98% range, as we were, was dangerous, too.

12 posted on 01/24/2010 5:41:28 PM PST by okie01 (THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA: Ignorance on Parade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: thackney

They cut a huge expansion project at their refinery in Port Arthur, TX too.

How long before the slump moves its way upstream?


13 posted on 01/24/2010 5:43:55 PM PST by proud_yank (Socialism - An Answer In Search Of A Question For Over 100 Years)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Repeal The 17th
Currently our refineries are under-utilized. This is following several years of rather significant refinery expansion, combined with falling demand in the downturn economy.

We still import refined products. It can be cheaper to import gasoline and diesel, than to import crude oil and submit to US regulation and taxes.


14 posted on 01/24/2010 5:44:53 PM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: proud_yank

Vallero spent too much too fast betting the high oil price wouldn’t slump so quick.

They invested heavily to take advantage of the cheaper, heavier oils. Then when the price of crude dropped, the delta between light and heavy really dropped and their investment gave them little return.


15 posted on 01/24/2010 5:53:22 PM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Freddd; okie01; thackney

Thanks for the reply ...
the equation is more complex than most people think.


16 posted on 01/24/2010 6:23:11 PM PST by Repeal The 17th (I AM JIM THOMPSON!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: MSF BU
My guess is 1-5 years depending on demand. Valero may just sell it also.
17 posted on 01/24/2010 7:30:01 PM PST by mad_as_he$$ (usff.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: thackney
SO remind me again why gasoline prices are still so high?

Cheers!

18 posted on 01/24/2010 7:33:20 PM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers
Price of oil.

Last time price of oil was this high, gasoline cost a little more than it does today.


19 posted on 01/24/2010 7:38:09 PM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Thud

We are seeing the effects of permanent demand destruction.


20 posted on 01/24/2010 7:48:58 PM PST by Dark Wing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-23 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson