Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Justice Roberts Hints He Could Overturn Roe
NewsMax ^ | 25 Jan 2010 | Theodore Kettle

Posted on 01/25/2010 11:34:34 AM PST by Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus

Chief Justice John Roberts last week made it clear that the Supreme Court over which he presides will not hesitate to sweep away its own major constitutional rulings when doing so is necessary to defend America’s bedrock governing document.

The announcement of that guiding core principle means two very big things. First, Roberts and his fellow strict constructionists on the court are now armed and ready with a powerful rationale for overturning the 1973 Roe v. Wade abortion ruling if Justice Anthony Kennedy or a future justice becomes the fifth vote against Roe.

Secondly, successfully placing Roberts atop the high court is beginning to look like former President George W. Bush’s most important legacy – a gift that will keep on giving for conservatives for decades.

In last Thursday’s 5-to-4 Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission ruling dismantling the McCain-Feingold campaign law, Roberts joined with fellow Bush appointee Justice Samuel Alito to issue a separate concurrence “to address the important principles of judicial restraint and stare decisis implicated in this case.”

While Roberts conceded that “departures from precedent are inappropriate in the absence of a ‘special justification,’” he quickly added that “At the same time, stare decisis is neither an ‘inexorable command’… nor ‘a mechanical formula of adherence to the latest decision’ … especially in constitutional cases,” noting that “If it were, segregation would be legal, minimum wage laws would be unconstitutional, and the Government could wiretap ordinary criminal suspects without first obtaining warrants.”

Instead, under the “stare decisis” judicial doctrine of respecting past rulings, “When considering whether to re-examine a prior erroneous holding, we must balance the importance of having constitutional questions decided against the importance of having them decided right.” The chief justice declared: “stare decisis is not an end in itself.”

(Excerpt) Read more at newsmax.com ...


TOPICS: Breaking News; Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: abortion; bush; bushlegacy; dubya; imissbush; johnroberts; lovedubya; moralabsolutes; presidentbush; presidentgeorgewbush; prolife; roberts; robertscourt; roe; roevswade; roevwade; scotus; supremecourt; thankyougwb; w
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 161-172 next last
To: Marathoner
GWB did 3 things right, Roberts, Tax Cuts and the war on Terror. Those are not small accomplishments by any means, but he could have done a lot better overall...

Let's not forget he "had a little help from his friends" on the SC nominations. Let's not forget his first choice was that intellectual giant, Harriet Myers.

101 posted on 01/25/2010 2:30:59 PM PST by gogeo ("Every one has a right to be an idiot. He abuses the privilege!" Groucho Marx)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus

My heart literally skipped a beat in happiness when I read that headline!! From the author’s fingers to God’s ears!!!
May the Unborn Holocaust end in my lifetime!!! :*)


102 posted on 01/25/2010 2:33:40 PM PST by pillut48 ("Stand now. Stand together. Stand for what is right."-Gov.Sarah Palin, "Going Rogue")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gogeo
What "help" did President Bush get on the John Roberts' nomination.

Can you refresh my memory?

Thanks.

103 posted on 01/25/2010 2:37:41 PM PST by ohioWfan (Proud Mom of a Bronze Star recipient!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus; mlizzy

For real??????? The dimocrats would go nuts.


104 posted on 01/25/2010 2:44:18 PM PST by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

Your tagline says it all, Salvation. :)


105 posted on 01/25/2010 2:45:26 PM PST by ohioWfan (Proud Mom of a Bronze Star recipient!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: Paperdoll; nickcarraway; Lady In Blue; NYer; ELS; Pyro7480; livius; Catholicguy; RobbyS; ...
**MAY ALL PRAYER CIRCLES GET ON THEIR KNEES FOR JUSTICE ROBERTS.**

 
 
 
 
 
Catholic Prayer Ping!
 
Please send me a FReepmail to be added or taken off the Catholic Prayer Ping List.

106 posted on 01/25/2010 2:47:19 PM PST by Salvation ("With God all things are possible." Matthew 19:26)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Joe 6-pack; BlessedBeGod; ohioWfan
Joe, your Post 57 and Post 61 along with BBG's Post 30 show you have a good understanding of what needs to be done.

Life at Conception Act, if passed, would define life as beginning at conception. If that happened, the Preamble, 5th, and the 14th amendments would apply to protecting the lives of the unborn. An admission made by the court in their Roe v. Wade ruling when Justice Blackmun wrote;
If this suggestion of personhood is established, the appellant’s case, of course, collapses, for the fetus’ right to life would then be guaranteed specifically by the Amendment.

Now the time to grovel before the Supreme Court is over.

Working from what the Supreme Court ruled in Roe, pro-life lawmakers can pass a Life at Conception Act and end abortion by using the Constitution instead of amending it.

A simple majority vote is all that is needed to pass a Life at Conception Act as opposed to the two-thirds required to add a Constitutional amendment.

When the Supreme Court handed down its now-infamous Roe v. Wade decision, it did so based on a new, previously undefined "right of privacy" which it "discovered" in so-called "emanations" of "penumbrae" of the Constitution.

Never once did the Supreme Court declare abortion itself to be a Constitutional right. Instead the Supreme Court said:

"We need not resolve the difficult question of when life begins . . . the judiciary at this point in the development of man's knowledge, is not in a position to speculate as to the answer."

37 years have passed, and man's knowledge has increased tremendously. Ultra-sounds and 3-D imaging are now common place, showing the growth and development of the unborn child. 37 years ago one could barely detect a heart beat until one was 3 or 4 months pregnant. Today one can witness the movements of a 2 month old unborn child.

8 week old unborn baby -- 8 wk unborn baby

107 posted on 01/25/2010 3:00:57 PM PST by Just A Nobody ( (Better Dead than RED! NEVER AGAIN...Support our Troops! Beware the ENEMEDIA))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: ohioWfan
The importance of this cannot be overstated.

Agreed! You have noticed the BDSers will not admit this, of course.

108 posted on 01/25/2010 3:08:13 PM PST by Just A Nobody ( (Better Dead than RED! NEVER AGAIN...Support our Troops! Beware the ENEMEDIA))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: willgolfforfood
If Roe is overturned, each of the 50 states (or is it 57?) will make their own rules on abortion.

Which, ironically, is just what we had before Roe. Some states were liberal about allowing abortion for most any damn reason, some states were quite restrictive. It is virtually certain, however, that in most cases the situation reflected the wishes of the people of the several States more faithfully than the current wide-open holocaust, the worst in the civilized world.

109 posted on 01/25/2010 3:13:22 PM PST by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Pride in the USA; Stillwaters
Secondly, successfully placing Roberts atop the high court is beginning to look like former President George W. Bush’s most important legacy – a gift that will keep on giving for conservatives for decades.

True. Thank you, President Bush.

110 posted on 01/25/2010 3:16:45 PM PST by lonevoice (If Fox News is the only outlet reporting it, did it really happen?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus

I love the man... a full grown adult manly man crying....

GODSPEED JUSTICE ROBERTS! GODSPEED!


111 posted on 01/25/2010 3:16:58 PM PST by MrDem (And this is a loyal lifelong Democrat saying this... Democrats for Cheney/Palin 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salvation
Remember who helped him get confirmed and escorted him around the Senate: Former Senator Fred Thompson!


112 posted on 01/25/2010 3:17:23 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet (I will raise $2 million for Sarah Palin: What will you do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Just A Nobody
Of course they won't admit it. That would take the courage to admit they're wrong.

They won't even give truthful statements about who chose CJ Roberts. It's pathetic, IMO.

I truly believe that the selection of Roberts and Alito by President Bush is the thread that's holding this country together until we can get rid of these Marxists in power.

And I say again, God BLESS President Bush for choosing these two fine originalist Justices.

113 posted on 01/25/2010 3:22:20 PM PST by ohioWfan (Proud Mom of a Bronze Star recipient!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus

Wow!


114 posted on 01/25/2010 3:24:07 PM PST by SuperLuminal (Where is another agitator for republicanism like Sam Adams when we need him?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus

And this will return the abortion question back to the states.


115 posted on 01/25/2010 3:33:03 PM PST by Perdogg ("Is that a bomb in your pants, or are you excited to come to America?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus; 185JHP; 230FMJ; 69ConvertibleFirebird; Albion Wilde; Aleighanne; ...
Moral Absolutes Ping!

Freepmail wagglebee or DirtyHarryY2K to subscribe or unsubscribe from the moral absolutes ping list.

FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
[ Add keyword moral absolutes to flag FR articles to this ping list ]


116 posted on 01/25/2010 3:46:47 PM PST by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paperdoll

Prayer bump


117 posted on 01/25/2010 3:50:41 PM PST by Tribune7 (Toll booths are devices funded by taxpayers to snarl traffic, waste gas and produce smog)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: willgolfforfood
Not necessarily ~ if decided on the basis of "equal protection" the states could all end up with the exact same law. If decided on a previously unused basis the USSC could reinstate all abortion laws retroactive to a date certain ~ and I'm sure Roberts has thought up the words to get around the presumption that we can't pass laws affecting the past.

There are dozens of possibilities that all result in the elimination of abortion. Some of those possibilities also work in the elimination of the abortionists.

118 posted on 01/25/2010 3:52:44 PM PST by muawiyah ("Git Out The Way")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Owl_Eagle

If we’re still around to see it. Glad to see someone understands how important this issue is.


119 posted on 01/25/2010 3:55:18 PM PST by BenKenobi (;)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: pepsi_junkie

“Oh yes, I think it would. 10th amendment and all that. The thing is, we’d get a real patchwork quilt of abortion laws. In New York, abortion would probably be legal into the 3rd trimester, in Virginia maybe it would be legal in cases of rape or incest. In Texas maybe it would be illegal everywhere. So then people would go across state lines and eventually the Supremos would declare it was a matter of interstate commerce and regulate it anyway. A federally protected right to abortion is a sacred cow to liberals, they will not let it go.”

Gee, that sounds similar to what prompted the 14th amendment. How can you be a person in one state and not a person in another? :D


120 posted on 01/25/2010 3:57:11 PM PST by BenKenobi (;)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 161-172 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson