Posted on 01/25/2010 7:58:55 PM PST by Mozilla
Rev. Dr. James David Manning calls out the Tea Party movement in two recent video messages. He is upset the birther issue not a major issue in the movement. He is also upset with independents not all being conservative as he puts it. Is he right? You decided. I take issue with portions of it. But he is right that some are trying to hijack the movement or could do it. Rev. James Manning calls out Dick Armey. However, Manning fails to be educated in what and how and who is really behind the movement. It sounds like Manning could not discuss the birther issue during the 9/12 event in D.C., which he attended, and they would not let him speak. He does have a point. He is also saying Dick Armey is stealing his ideas. You be the judge.
Ask Tea Party About Birth Certificate
Dick Armey Leads The Thieves Party
(Excerpt) Read more at atlahmedianetwork.com ...
Sounds like he’s worried about his own applecart...
Wondering as to the status of Rev. Manning’s lawsuit against Columbia University for them to prove that Obummer ever actually was a student there? Anybody hear anything?
I thought he said in November that he was going to be arrested for threatening Obama.
Rev. Manning is going to find Massachusetts independents less amenable to such importunation than conservatives, to say the least.
bump
There are several different “wills” that want to suborn the Tea Party movement to *their* agendas, and He’s one of them.
Isn’t this the guy who claimed, without any evidence, that Obama was a member of al qaeda in the early ‘80s, before it even existed?
Yes, there is no law suit.
Yes it is. He made the claim, but I don’t know what even his proof is that Obama was in Afghanistan or where ever. It sounds to me like Rev. James David Manning has issues with anybody who doesn’t want to talk about the birther issue. He has chosen to attack the right since none of them will mention the issue. His only ally seems to be Michael Savage.
Well I don’t know much about the Columbia University lawsuit. Just what Manning has said. I only keep up with him because he does keep up with the Obama birth certifcate issue. I personally would like someone to keep checking on it. So I try to stay informed. At times I too have had issues with people that solely want to focus on the birth issue and nothing else. Sounds Like Manning gave up focusing on the liberal msm and on other important issues relating to Obama. He just is crusading to get rid of Obama on the account he is a birther, for the most part.
I mean Rev Manning is only, for the most part, focused on Birther issues. He wants Obama gone on the account that he is an illegal alien.
I mean Rev Manning is only, for the most part, focused on Birther issues. He wants Obama gone on the account that he is an illegal alien.
I would say the same way Manning is critical to people hijacking the agenda of the tea party, he too is hijacking it. I agree it is wrong that he can’t talk his issues, but at the same time the Tea Party movement is a good movement and it is sad Manning is wanting to attack it. I think the biggest problem is Manning was not allowed to speak at the 9/12 march. Since then he has been critical of all in the movement. Namely, Glenn Beck, Fox News, Bill O’Reilly, and now Dick Armey.
It is either Manning’s attacking of Fox News or the fact Manning was also profiled on World Net Daily which made Savage aware of James David Manning. So Michael Savage has had him on his show. It a complex situation why savage has beef with Fox News. years ago Savage used to be on Fox News as a guest before msnbc tried to steal FNC’s thunder by going right and put on a show with Savage. Savage was quickly fired for comments he made to caller. Since then FNC has not come calling or to the defense of Savage. So not surprised he is aligned with James David Manning.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.