Of course it is, as laid out in the Constitution.
Will you plainly answer whether or not you support and revere the US Constitution? It sure seems that you do not.
The method of self-governance laid out in that document is NOT one of jury vigilantism and chaos, but of elected representation and distributed powers. The sort of small, focused, absolute authority you espouse is PRECISELY what the Founders prohibit!
Perhaps we've abdicated that responsibilty? Perhaps we have for too long lazily delegated that duty further and further up the chain of power that we can no longer make decisions for ourselves about what sort of communities we'd like to have?
Who is this "we" of which you speak? Don't you mean the sort of communities you would like to have?
I mean, that's what you're really getting at. You don't want "the people" to govern, since they sometimes create laws you don't like. You want to be able to ignore and override "the people" so you can have things your way.
It's the spirit of tyranny, no different than Hugo Chavez.
If so, let us hang our heads in shame, for we're unworthy of the inheritance bequeathed to us in blood by our nation's founders!
How utterly absurd and mocking of you to mention the nation's founders while you proudly undermine the principles for which they fought!
You should hang your head in shame. You carry the spirit of everything the founders opposed.
If you're suggesting that the consequences of my principles might convince me to abandon my principles, you've misjudged me, my FRiend.
I'm suggesting you think about what you're really saying, and how it would work if your ideas were applied on a large scale.
I doubt you'll change your mind, since you haven't had to actually see and consider the consequences of your ideas. Your principles are anti-American and anti-conservative.
Thank God there aren't too many of you.