Skip to comments.
Why Is NOW So Afraid of a Pro-Life, Pro-Family Ad?
FOXNews.com ^
| 2/1/10
| Marjorie Dannenfelser
Posted on 02/01/2010 4:41:53 PM PST by rhema
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-31 last
To: sodpoodle
"Since 1973 FIFTY MILLION AMERICANS HAVE BEEN KILLED in this genocide."
And in an age/era when contraceptives are virtually fool-proof except for user error, those numbers are really outrageous. Just more not having to be accountable/responsible. Why not? They can always have it 'taken care of'.
If abortion were illegal, a LOT more people would be motivated to use contraceptives correctly.
21
posted on
02/01/2010 6:20:09 PM PST
by
Let's Roll
(Stop paying ACORN to destroy America! Cut off their government funding!)
To: A_Former_Democrat
Yep, the day I had my now 37 year-old twins. I did what I could to counter.
To: ought-six
well said. i have always wondered why the “pro-choice” crowd has such a problem with ladies who CHOOSE to have a child rather than an abortion. to me choice is a)give birth and raise the child. b)give birth and give the child over to another family thru adoption. c)abortion- the last resort of a desperate and dangerous pregnancy.
but the so called womens rights movement sees only one choice and that is abortion. for them the right to choose means a woman murders her unborn child
23
posted on
02/01/2010 8:33:59 PM PST
by
madamemayhem
(defeat isn't getting knocked down, it's not getting back up)
To: Guenevere
I think it is ingenous that they are aiming this ad towards men who are the primary audience for the Superbowl. Might make a few younger ones who might be in this position one day not to press so hard to end it and think about the baby first. :)
To: rhema
Most of the leadership of NOW is stuck back in the 1970’s. Feminism has passed them by a long time ago. Abortion is a sacrament in the church of NOW. It is their way of lashing out against their archenemy, patriarchy, which begins with the chief patriarch himself, God the Father. There is nothing that offends God more than the slaughter of infants on the altars of Ashtaroth, so killing unborn children is a rebuke of God the Father. But since men wrote the Bible, that too must be rejected. The hatred toward anything that might cast doubts upon abortion is evident in their fear of Tebow’s pro-life message. Logic does not apply to the leadership of NOW. It is all based psychological needs, not logic.
To: oldbrowser
With all Hollywood at their disposal, surely NOW could spin something up if they wanted.
26
posted on
02/02/2010 12:09:10 AM PST
by
HiTech RedNeck
(I am in America but not of America (per bible: am in the world but not of it))
To: Nosterrex
If so, they should think, would NOW really want a "God the Mother" that behaves they way they do? That would be a celestial tyrantess.
27
posted on
02/02/2010 12:10:28 AM PST
by
HiTech RedNeck
(I am in America but not of America (per bible: am in the world but not of it))
To: rhema
The only "choice" NOW respects it the "choice" to murder babies. If you "choose" to keep the baby you MUST be silenced.
"Follow the money, honey"....the abortion mills provide the support to NOW.
28
posted on
02/02/2010 1:42:07 AM PST
by
highlander_UW
(There's a storm coming - little kid at a Mexican gas station in The Terminator)
To: HiTech RedNeck
Most of the NOW leadership works under the umbrella of liberation theology which includes feminist theology. They believe that the Bible and the church are agents of oppression toward women and homosexuals. Probably the vast majority of NOW’s leadership is composed of lesbians. Some feminists have advocated placing a warning sign on the cover of Bibles warning women that this book is detrimental to your health. Feminists see traditional or biblical Christianity as the problem. The few feminists in NOW, if they do use the bible, use a hermeneutical principle that disgards the intentions of original authors or audiences’ for an interpretation that meets their immediate needs. In other words, you are free to interpret the bible anyway that you want as long as it conforms to felt needs.
Many of the feminists theologians that I have met, such as Sallie McFague, have moved on to panentheism or pantheism, which for them is a form of nature worship, as in Mother Nature. They worship the divinity within themselves.
To: rhema; Clintonfatigued; fieldmarshaldj; AuH2ORepublican; Arthur Wildfire! March; NFHale; ...
This ad may get people thinking.
30
posted on
02/03/2010 12:53:16 PM PST
by
Impy
(RED=COMMUNIST, NOT REPUBLICAN | NO "INDIVIDUAL MANDATE"!!!!!!!)
To: Impy; metmom; wagglebee; cpforlife.org; narses; Marie2
31
posted on
02/03/2010 5:18:39 PM PST
by
Arthur Wildfire! March
(2010 HOUSE RACES! Help everyone get the goods on their House Rats. See my profile.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-31 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson