Where a liberal sees reasons to envy, a conservative sees opportunities.
More for your list at post 23. From April 14, 2009
The Obama Administration Is Criminalizing Dissent? Intimidating Its Ideological Opponents? [Andy McCarthy]
Im still digging out of my various pre-election hate mail piles you know, How could say Obama is a socialist who will redistribute wealth just because he used to be a member of a socialist party and criticized the Warren Court for failing to order the redistribution of wealth?; How could you say Obama is a Left-wing radical rather than a centrist moderate just because he made common cause with Bill Ayers, Bernadine Dohrn, Mike Klonsky, Jeremiah Wright, Frank Marshall Davis, et al?; How could you say Obama would be an extremist on abortion and other life issues just because he supported infanticide as a Chicago legislator?; How could you say Obama would be anti-Israel in his governance and appointments just because he pals around with Rashid Khalidi?; How could you say an Obama administration would turn TARP into a Big Government slush fund just because he managed the Chicago Annenberg Challenge as a Big Lefty slush fund?; How could you say Obama will be soft on Iran just because Obama is soft on Iran?; etc. But I note that I got plenty for this one, too:
Obamas Assault on the First Amendment
Ill be blunt: Sen. Obama and his supporters despise free expression, the bedrock of American self-determinism and hence American democracy. Whats more, like garden-variety despots, they see law not as a means of ensuring liberty but as a tool to intimidate and quell dissent....
[I]n St. Louis, local law-enforcement authorities, dominated by Democrat-party activists, [are] threatening libel prosecutions against Obamas political opposition. County Circuit Attorney Bob McCulloch and City Circuit Attorney Jennifer Joyce, abetted by a local sheriff and encouraged by the Obama campaign, warned that members of the public who dared speak out against Obama during the campaigns crucial final weeks would face criminal libel charges if, in the judgment of these conflicted officials, such criticism of their champion was false.
Item: When the American Issues Project ran political ads calling attention to Obamas extensive ties to Ayers, the Weatherman terrorist who brags about having bombed the Pentagon and the U.S. Capitol, the Obama campaign pressured the Justice Department to launch an absurd criminal prosecution.
Item: When commentator Stanley Kurtz of the Ethics and Public Policy Center was invited on a Chicago radio program to discuss his investigation of the Chicago Annenberg Challenge, an education reform project in which Obama and Ayers (just a guy who lives in my neighborhood) collaborated to dole out over $100 million, the Obama campaign issued an Internet action alert. Supporters, armed with the campaigns non-responsive talking points, dutifully flooded the program with calls and emails, protesting Kurtzs appearance and attempting to shout him down.
Nor was these an isolated incidents. Cont...
http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=MDkyMDNiNjZjNGM4OTkzZmI0NWJkMGMyODE0NjY2YzE#