Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

At last! Have they finally found a 'weapon of mass destruction' in Iraq? ^ | Feb. 5, 2010 | Carol Driver

Posted on 02/05/2010 11:32:56 AM PST by Free ThinkerNY

They have been searching in Iraq for the past nine years, 10 months and 15 days.

Today, the hard work finally paid off as soldiers found one of those elusive ‘weapons of mass destruction’ that Saddam Hussein was supposed to have been hiding.

So is it all round to Tony Blair's house for celebratory drinks?

Unfortunately the discovery came just a few days late for the former prime minister, who could have used the extraordinary find as proof he was right about Iraq all along during the Chilcot Inquiry.

But from the looks of the rocket, it would appear unlikely it could be deployed anywhere in 45 minutes, let alone be fired at the UK, as a certain dossier led us to believe.

The bomb is thought to have been buried by Saddam Hussein's regime before the UK and U.S. invasion of Iraq started in 2003.

Iraqi guards were as surprised as the rest of us to discover the 'missile' during an operation in Baghdad's Abu Ghraib suburb.

It is not yet known whether the seven-metre rocket is armed with a warhead.

(Excerpt) Read more at ...

TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: iraq; iraqwar; saddam; saddamhussein; saddamswmd; wmd; wmds
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 next last
To: 2CAVTrooper
Reminiscent of a decaying walrus.
21 posted on 02/05/2010 11:48:47 AM PST by MaxMax (Lets get a sense)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

Hmmm - I’m not much on military stuff but it looks like a dirt bomb to me ......

22 posted on 02/05/2010 11:49:36 AM PST by SkyDancer (But whosoever shall deny me before men, him will I also deny before my Father)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

Comment #23 Removed by Moderator

To: American Constitutionalist

Liberals lied, the economy died.

24 posted on 02/05/2010 11:55:29 AM PST by TexasFreeper2009 (November is coming.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TheClintons-STILLAnti-American

No kidding. I guess being buried for all these years probably would hamper it’s ability to fly a bit!! good grief. And if there was one there’s probably more maybe syria???? hint hint
Besides, as I recall, there were a WHOLE BUNCH of liberals telling us about those dangerous wmd BEFORE the war, regardless of what they said later.
Do we really have to drag those tapes out and go thru this whole debate again??

25 posted on 02/05/2010 11:56:03 AM PST by jackv (The darkness hates the light!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TexasFreeper2009
Liberals lied, Freedom and the economy died....

There now, fixed..
26 posted on 02/05/2010 11:57:22 AM PST by American Constitutionalist (There is no civility in the way the Communist/Marxist want to destroy the USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: All

Saddam’s General Sada says the WMD went to Syria:

Saddam’s Secrets: How an Iraqi General Defied & Survived Saddam Hussein (Hardcover)

27 posted on 02/05/2010 12:03:34 PM PST by sheikdetailfeather (The dogs barked and the caravans rolled on!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: texas_mrs
I thought these rockets were proof.

Forty-one Sarin-filled Rockets found in Iraq October 08, 2004

28 posted on 02/05/2010 12:04:25 PM PST by DJ MacWoW (Make yourselves sheep and the wolves will eat you. Ben Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jackv
"Besides, as I recall, there were a WHOLE BUNCH of liberals telling us about those dangerous wmd BEFORE the war, regardless of what they said later."

And a whole lot of them that said going into Iraq to take out Saddam was the right and honorable thing to do.

But that's the beauty of having no integrity. Only what you're saying at the moment matters.

29 posted on 02/05/2010 12:05:16 PM PST by TheClintons-STILLAnti-American
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: sheikdetailfeather

Saddam Hussein, Terrorists & WMD in Iraq

30 posted on 02/05/2010 12:07:25 PM PST by sheikdetailfeather (The dogs barked and the caravans rolled on!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

>> found one of those elusive ‘weapons of mass destruction’

Again, the premise is wrong. It was the threat of acquiring WMD.

31 posted on 02/05/2010 12:09:02 PM PST by Gene Eric (Your Hope has been redistributed. Here's your Change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

WE know chemical weapons were there. In 2004 we found a railhead in Anbar Province and from there a road heading straight into Syria. From the look of the road, it had been heavily used. I was informed, look carefully because this was the route that the WMD’s were brought into Syria earlier. We did a 180 at the Syrian border. It really makes me angry for the ignorant liberals to keep bleating away that there were no WMD’s in Iraq. I guess Chemical Ali attacked the Kurds with evil thoughts. Grrrr

32 posted on 02/05/2010 12:14:40 PM PST by jesseam (Been there, done that)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

There is a whole freaking list of WMD’s found Iraq if the msm had any honesty not just a total dem talking point propaganda program.

33 posted on 02/05/2010 12:15:23 PM PST by Lady Heron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ravingnutter

And during the time that the WMD’s were being moved to Syria and beyond, the treasoncrats here in the U.S. were running flak for their beloved saddam by demanding that President Bush go before the U.N. to ask for permission.

Treasoncrats who were for the war before they were against it:

“This December will mark three years since United Nations inspectors last visited Iraq. There is no doubt that since that time, Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to refine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer- range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies.” — From a December 6, 2001 letter signed by Bob Graham, Joe Lieberman, Harold Ford, & Tom Lantos among others

“Whereas Iraq has consistently breached its cease-fire agreement between Iraq and the United States, entered into on March 3, 1991, by failing to dismantle its weapons of mass destruction program, and refusing to permit monitoring and verification by United Nations inspections; Whereas Iraq has developed weapons of mass destruction, including chemical and biological capabilities, and has made positive progress toward developing nuclear weapons capabilities” — From a joint resolution submitted by Tom Harkin and Arlen Specter on July 18, 2002

“Saddam’s goal ... is to achieve the lifting of U.N. sanctions while retaining and enhancing Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction programs. We cannot, we must not and we will not let him succeed.” — Madeline Albright, 1998

“(Saddam) will rebuild his arsenal of weapons of mass destruction and some day, some way, I am certain he will use that arsenal again, as he has 10 times since 1983” — National Security Adviser Sandy Berger, Feb 18, 1998

“Iraq made commitments after the Gulf War to completely dismantle all weapons of mass destruction, and unfortunately, Iraq has not lived up to its agreement.” — Barbara Boxer, November 8, 2002

“The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October of 1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retained some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capability. Intelligence reports also indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons, but has not yet achieved nuclear capability.” — Robert Byrd, October 2002

“There’s no question that Saddam Hussein is a threat... Yes, he has chemical and biological weapons. He’s had those for a long time. But the United States right now is on a very much different defensive posture than we were before September 11th of 2001... He is, as far as we know, actively pursuing nuclear capabilities, though he doesn’t have nuclear warheads yet. If he were to acquire nuclear weapons, I think our friends in the region would face greatly increased risks as would we.” — Wesley Clark on September 26, 2002

“What is at stake is how to answer the potential threat Iraq represents with the risk of proliferation of WMD. Baghdad’s regime did use such weapons in the past. Today, a number of evidences may lead to think that, over the past four years, in the absence of international inspectors, this country has continued armament programs.” — Jacques Chirac, October 16, 2002

“The community of nations may see more and more of the very kind of threat Iraq poses now: a rogue state with weapons of mass destruction, ready to use them or provide them to terrorists. If we fail to respond today, Saddam and all those who would follow in his footsteps will be emboldened tomorrow.” — Bill Clinton in 1998

“In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including Al Qaeda members, though there is apparently no evidence of his involvement in the terrible events of September 11, 2001. It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons. Should he succeed in that endeavor, he could alter the political and security landscape of the Middle East, which as we know all too well affects American security.” — Hillary Clinton, October 10, 2002

“I am absolutely convinced that there are weapons...I saw evidence back in 1998 when we would see the inspectors being barred from gaining entry into a warehouse for three hours with trucks rolling up and then moving those trucks out.” — Clinton’s Secretary of Defense William Cohen in April of 2003

“Iraq is not the only nation in the world to possess weapons of mass destruction, but it is the only nation with a leader who has used them against his own people.” — Tom Daschle in 1998

“Saddam Hussein’s regime represents a grave threat to America and our allies, including our vital ally, Israel. For more than two decades, Saddam Hussein has sought weapons of mass destruction through every available means. We know that he has chemical and biological weapons. He has already used them against his neighbors and his own people, and is trying to build more. We know that he is doing everything he can to build nuclear weapons, and we know that each day he gets closer to achieving that goal.” — John Edwards, Oct 10, 2002

“The debate over Iraq is not about politics. It is about national security. It should be clear that our national security requires Congress to send a clear message to Iraq and the world: America is united in its determination to eliminate forever the threat of Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction.” — John Edwards, Oct 10, 2002

“I share the administration’s goals in dealing with Iraq and its weapons of mass destruction.” — Dick Gephardt in September of 2002

“Iraq does pose a serious threat to the stability of the Persian Gulf and we should organize an international coalition to eliminate his access to weapons of mass destruction. Iraq’s search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to completely deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power.” — Al Gore, 2002

“We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction.” — Bob Graham, December 2002

“Saddam Hussein is not the only deranged dictator who is willing to deprive his people in order to acquire weapons of mass destruction.” — Jim Jeffords, October 8, 2002

“We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction.” — Ted Kennedy, September 27, 2002

“There is no doubt that Saddam Hussein’s regime is a serious danger, that he is a tyrant, and that his pursuit of lethal weapons of mass destruction cannot be tolerated. He must be disarmed.” — Ted Kennedy, Sept 27, 2002

“I will be voting to give the president of the United States the authority to use force - if necessary - to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security.” — John F. Kerry, Oct 2002

“The threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real, but as I said, it is not new. It has been with us since the end of that war, and particularly in the last 4 years we know after Operation Desert Fox failed to force him to reaccept them, that he has continued to build those weapons. He has had a free hand for 4 years to reconstitute these weapons, allowing the world, during the interval, to lose the focus we had on weapons of mass destruction and the issue of proliferation.” — John Kerry, October 9, 2002

“(W)e need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime. We all know the litany of his offenses. He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation. ...And now he is miscalculating America’s response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction. That is why the world, through the United Nations Security Council, has spoken with one voice, demanding that Iraq disclose its weapons programs and disarm. So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real, but it is not new. It has been with us since the end of the Persian Gulf War.” — John Kerry, Jan 23, 2003

“We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandates of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and the means of delivering them.” — Carl Levin, Sept 19, 2002

“Every day Saddam remains in power with chemical weapons, biological weapons, and the development of nuclear weapons is a day of danger for the United States.” — Joe Lieberman, August, 2002

“Over the years, Iraq has worked to develop nuclear, chemical and biological weapons. During 1991 - 1994, despite Iraq’s denials, U.N. inspectors discovered and dismantled a large network of nuclear facilities that Iraq was using to develop nuclear weapons. Various reports indicate that Iraq is still actively pursuing nuclear weapons capability. There is no reason to think otherwise. Beyond nuclear weapons, Iraq has actively pursued biological and chemical weapons.U.N. inspectors have said that Iraq’s claims about biological weapons is neither credible nor verifiable. In 1986, Iraq used chemical weapons against Iran, and later, against its own Kurdish population. While weapons inspections have been successful in the past, there have been no inspections since the end of 1998. There can be no doubt that Iraq has continued to pursue its goal of obtaining weapons of mass destruction.” — Patty Murray, October 9, 2002

“As a member of the House Intelligence Committee, I am keenly aware that the proliferation of chemical and biological weapons is an issue of grave importance to all nations. Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process.” — Nancy Pelosi, December 16, 1998

“Even today, Iraq is not nearly disarmed. Based on highly credible intelligence, UNSCOM [the U.N. weapons inspectors] suspects that Iraq still has biological agents like anthrax, botulinum toxin, and clostridium perfringens in sufficient quantity to fill several dozen bombs and ballistic missile warheads, as well as the means to continue manufacturing these deadly agents. Iraq probably retains several tons of the highly toxic VX substance, as well as sarin nerve gas and mustard gas. This agent is stored in artillery shells, bombs, and ballistic missile warheads. And Iraq retains significant dual-use industrial infrastructure that can be used to rapidly reconstitute large-scale chemical weapons production.” — Ex-Un Weapons Inspector Scott Ritter in 1998

“There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years. And that may happen sooner if he can obtain access to enriched uranium from foreign sources — something that is not that difficult in the current world. We also should remember we have always underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction.” — John Rockefeller, Oct 10, 2002

“Saddam’s existing biological and chemical weapons capabilities pose a very real threat to America, now. Saddam has used chemical weapons before, both against Iraq’s enemies and against his own people. He is working to develop delivery systems like missiles and unmanned aerial vehicles that could bring these deadly weapons against U.S. forces and U.S. facilities in the Middle East.” — John Rockefeller, Oct 10, 2002

“Whether one agrees or disagrees with the Administration’s policy towards Iraq, I don’t think there can be any question about Saddam’s conduct. He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do. He lies and cheats; he snubs the mandate and authority of international weapons inspectors; and he games the system to keep buying time against enforcement of the just and legitimate demands of the United Nations, the Security Council, the United States and our allies. Those are simply the facts.” — Henry Waxman, Oct 10, 2002

Treasoncrats are all for unilateral bombing campaigns as long as they have their finger on the button, but if there is a Republican in office then they’re against it (IF it’s politically expedient for them)

34 posted on 02/05/2010 12:20:07 PM PST by 2CAVTrooper (For those who have had to fight for it, freedom has a flavor the protected shall never know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Free ThinkerNY

Um, WMD’s had already been found buried in the desert years ago. Artilary shells packed with sarin gas, mustard gas, and anthrax were dug up by U.S. troops. They had been buried for such a long time that the materials were degraded beyond their usefulness as a WMD, but there were found. This was (very briefly) reported in the news, but the Lame Stream media mostly ignored this. My son’s unit also found some things related to WMD’s but he couldn’t give details. Perhaps one day the truth will come out (I’ll probably be long gone by then).

35 posted on 02/05/2010 12:21:48 PM PST by SoldierDad (Proud Papa of two new Army Brats! Congrats to my Soldier son and his wife.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoldierDad

IIRC Bush didn’t publicize it much and went around looking like he lied about them in the first place.

36 posted on 02/05/2010 12:23:26 PM PST by votemout
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


37 posted on 02/05/2010 12:23:32 PM PST by raygunfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: votemout

If Bush had a major problem, it was his ability (inability) to communicate to the American people just what was happening in Iraq, and what was found. I’m not sure how much he’s to blame and how much the liberal media and congress is to blame.

38 posted on 02/05/2010 12:27:18 PM PST by SoldierDad (Proud Papa of two new Army Brats! Congrats to my Soldier son and his wife.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: SoldierDad

Any lie that makes it into the media needs to be countered. That was Bush’s fault (for real). He let the accusations go unchallenged for the most part. I don’t recall him going on the tube with a summary of the evidence. Meanwhile every loon in the country was spouting the Bush lied BS.

39 posted on 02/05/2010 12:37:48 PM PST by votemout
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: texas_mrs
I've always considered the 500 tons of yellowcake they removed July 08 as WMD, but hey, I'm not the media.

That was known about from the first Gulf war and was kept under lock and key and was monitored by the IAEA.

From your link:

Israeli warplanes bombed a reactor project at the site in 1981. Later, U.N. inspectors documented and safeguarded the yellowcake, which had been stored in aging drums and containers since before the 1991 Gulf War. There was no evidence of any yellowcake dating from after 1991, the official said.

40 posted on 02/05/2010 12:41:41 PM PST by Ol' Dan Tucker (People should not be afraid of the government. Governement should be afraid of the people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-51 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson