Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 02/12/2010 6:25:10 AM PST by Michael van der Galien
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Michael van der Galien

Because blacks can’t be racists — in their minds....


2 posted on 02/12/2010 6:28:33 AM PST by Jerrybob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Michael van der Galien

I thought Hill was given his hippity hop papers a month ago? Did he play the race card with FOX?


3 posted on 02/12/2010 6:28:41 AM PST by Doogle (USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Michael van der Galien

Because most whiteys choose to go crazy because people say certain words.


5 posted on 02/12/2010 6:30:21 AM PST by pnh102 (Regarding liberalism, always attribute to malice what you think can be explained by stupidity. - Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Michael van der Galien

Many Blacks, like Hill, will never believe that most Whites aren’t evil Black people haters; no matter what advantages Blacks are given simply because of the color of their skin. No affirmative action, no racial quotas will ever be enough and Whites needs to realize this fact. Hill operates from this vantage point.


6 posted on 02/12/2010 6:30:43 AM PST by originalbuckeye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Michael van der Galien
...an affiliated faculty member in African American Studies...

With a plagiarized thesis a quick talking hip hop dummy can be a PhD! O'Reilly loves this guy.

7 posted on 02/12/2010 6:31:38 AM PST by IbJensen (A Prayer for Obama (Ps 109.8): "Let his days be few; and let another take his position.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Michael van der Galien
I would actually care about the double standard but I think Mayer is a d!@#head anyway. He wouldn't come to our defense....
8 posted on 02/12/2010 6:33:08 AM PST by Niteranger68 ("Obama voters will pay dearly!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Michael van der Galien
Never the less, he’s still featured occasionally as an unpaid commentator

At least weekly on O'Reilly.

10 posted on 02/12/2010 6:34:31 AM PST by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Michael van der Galien

Blacks have always gotten away with calling a white man, “boy”. But a white person better never do that.


11 posted on 02/12/2010 6:38:29 AM PST by Dewey Revoltnow (Worst. Community. Organizer. Ever!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Michael van der Galien

Because we’re white, therefore we suck.


12 posted on 02/12/2010 6:38:38 AM PST by albie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Michael van der Galien

If Mayer were to say he isn’t attracted to women with green eyes, would that also be “irresponsible”?

Note Mayer did not say he would not hire a black woman or rent an apt to her. He’s talking about physical attraction—hardly what I consider in the realm of “racism,” (whatever that is).


13 posted on 02/12/2010 6:40:38 AM PST by freespirited (Congratulations Senator Brown. One down, 59 to go.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Michael van der Galien
How Come Marc Lamont Hill can call John Mayer a “White boy” and Not Be Called a Racist for It?

Because nobody pays any attention to anything Marc Lamont Hill has to say...he's a racist.

15 posted on 02/12/2010 6:42:44 AM PST by lonestar (Obama and his czars have turned Bush's "mess" into a national crisis!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Michael van der Galien

when he mentions that people who find black women desireable need more “self love”, isn’t he demeaning black women as well? unless one needs to be self-hating to like black women, and he think’s that is a good thing?


17 posted on 02/12/2010 6:54:04 AM PST by camle (keep an open mind and someone will fill it full of something for you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Michael van der Galien

http://www.uccs.edu/~wpc/index.htm

http://www.uccs.edu/~wpc/youth-conference.htm

That’s why...


18 posted on 02/12/2010 6:54:59 AM PST by ltc8k6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Michael van der Galien
The Extreme Makeover of Fox News: Analyst Marc Lamont Hill [far left radical]
Accuracy In Media - AIM Column ^ | October 2, 2009 | Cliff Kincaid

Posted on Saturday, October 03, 2009 9:59:20 PM by ETL

Who would plaster his Twitter page with police mug shot photos of convicted cop-killer Assata Shakur? Fox News contributor Marc Lamont Hill did. At least until David Horowitz and Accuracy in Media took notice and wrote about it. Now the page features photos of boxing great Muhammad Ali. Hill's MySpace page is also gone.

There are other changes as well. The tributes to Shakur and black racist Khallid Muhammad, known as "America's Black Hitler," have disappeared from his web pages. The articles were saved, however, and can be found here.

(Excerpt) Read more at aim.org ...
____________________________________________

"I, however, will remember Dr. Khallid [Muhammad] for what he truly was: mentor, teacher and revolutionary hero" -Marc Lamont Hill

Source: Cliff Kincaid of Accuracy in Media (AIM) - pdf file:
http://www.usasurvival.org/docs/MarcLamontHillarticles.pdf
____________________________________________

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

From David Horowitz's
FrontPageMag.com/DiscoverTheNetworks.org

PROFILE: KHALID ABDUL MUHAMMAD


19 posted on 02/12/2010 6:58:31 AM PST by ETL (ALL (most?) of the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Michael van der Galien
How Come Marc Lamont Hill can call John Mayer a “White boy” and Not Be Called a Racist for It?

Duhhh...'cause he is white, and a young guy? Anybody under forty is a boy to me!

20 posted on 02/12/2010 7:08:32 AM PST by JimRed ("Hey, hey, Teddy K., hot enough down there today?" TERM LIMITS, NOW AND FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Michael van der Galien

Hill is a despicable racist.


21 posted on 02/12/2010 7:09:55 AM PST by newfreep (Palin/DeMint 2012 - Bolton: Secy of State)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Michael van der Galien
NewsReal Blog and Accuracy in Media were successful in getting Hill fired as a paid contributor at Fox. Never the less, he’s still featured occasionally as an unpaid commentator.

He is not paid for his weekly appearances on BOR's show or his infrequent appearances on Red Eye?

25 posted on 02/12/2010 7:19:39 AM PST by onyx (BE A MONTHLY DONOR - I AM)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Michael van der Galien

Why is this any different than constantly having pundits like Al Sharpton on and asking his opinion on race? Or the head of the NAACP or the Black Caucus or pretending in general that most blacks aren’t racial? We are delusional in the country. As long as whites continue to play pretend they will have there ass handed to them and eventually lose this nation playing the one way race game.


29 posted on 02/12/2010 7:31:56 AM PST by Altura Ct.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Michael van der Galien

"Black theology will accept only the love of God which participates in the destruction of the white enemy. What we need is the divine love as expressed in Black Power, which is the power of black people to destroy their oppressors here and now by any means at their disposal".
--James (Jim) Cone,
African American Religious Thought: An Anthology (Paperback)
by Cornel West (Editor), Eddie S. Glaude Jr. (Editor)

SEAN HANNITY: But Reverend Jeremiah Wright is not backing down and has not for years and in his strong stance on the teaching of black liberation theology is nothing new. He had the same things to say last spring when he appeared on "Hannity & Colmes:"

WRIGHT: If you're not going to talk about theology in context, if you're not going to talk about liberation theology that came out of the '60s, systematized black liberation theology that started with Jim Cone in 1968 and the writings of Cone and the writings of Dwight Hopkins and the writings of womynist theologians and Asian theologians and Hispanic theologians, then you can't talk about the black value system.

HANNITY: But I'm a — reverend

WRIGHT: Do you know liberation theology, sir?

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,354158,00.html

32 posted on 02/12/2010 10:09:47 AM PST by ETL (ALL (most?) of the Obama-commie connections at my FR Home page: http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson