Beck: Do you believe the government was any way involved with the bringing down of the World Trade Centers on 9/11?
Medina: I don’t
What is more clear than that?
That would be clear if that is what she said. It isn’t. You can’t just crop the quotation wherever you see fit.
She said ...
“I don’t, I don’t have enough evidence there, Glenn.”
not ...
“I don’t. I don’t have enough evidence there, Glenn.” (which means I have a definite opinion but lack the evidence with which to form an opinion — and thus makes no sense) ...
or
“I don’t, I don’t. Have enough evidence there, Glenn.” (which means I can’t form a complete sentence ... and thus makes no sense).
Your “interpretation” is wrong. “Spinner Web” is a fitting handle — you’re spinning.
SnakeDoc
What is more clear than that?
Because her followup negates those words.
If your was correct she would say something like:
"I don't, because it's an absurd claim"
Instead it was more like
"I don't, but I'm likely wrong"