To: reaganaut1
When Deficits Become Dangerous It passed that point a long time ago.
2 posted on
02/12/2010 11:06:15 AM PST by
The Sons of Liberty
(Pork Eating CRUSADER - FUBO! Mene, Mene, Tekel, Upharsin)
To: reaganaut1; Harrius Magnus; mojitojoe; Pelham; mom2twinsn2; LongLiveTheRepublic; ...
The Peter Schiff/Redistribution Watch Ping. (Washington Bankrupting our Nation by Spending your past, present and future money!) We are screwed: Remarkably, President Obama will add more red ink in his first two years than President George W. Bushberated by conservatives for his failure to control domestic spending and by liberals for the explosion of military spending in Iraq and Afghanistandid in eight. In his first 15 months, Mr. Obama will raise the debt burdenthe ratio of the national debt to GDPby more than Reagan did in eight years.
3 posted on
02/12/2010 11:06:36 AM PST by
sickoflibs
(( "It's not the taxes, the redistribution is spending you demand stupid"))
To: reaganaut1
4 posted on
02/12/2010 11:07:01 AM PST by
Jim Robinson
(JUST VOTE THEM OUT! teapartyexpress.org)
To: DoughtyOne; stephenjohnbanker; FromLori
This thread is a good place to continue this discussion :)
5 posted on
02/12/2010 11:08:55 AM PST by
sickoflibs
(( "It's not the taxes, the redistribution is spending you demand stupid"))
To: reaganaut1
Remarkably, President Obama will add more red ink in his first two years than President George W. Bushberated by conservatives for his failure to control domestic spending and by liberals for the explosion of military spending in Iraq and Afghanistandid in eight. In his first 15 months, Mr. Obama will raise the debt burdenthe ratio of the national debt to GDPby more than Reagan did in eight years.I'm soooo surprised........
***roll eyes***
6 posted on
02/12/2010 11:11:25 AM PST by
metmom
(Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
To: reaganaut1
A conservative President, who made drastic cutbacks in spending to reduce the deficit, would have the support of his voting base.
Obama’s base is addicted to government largess. He can't reduce expenditures, without losing his base. He can't raise taxes, without losing the “moderates”.
To: reaganaut1
see where I come from, deficits are ALWAYS dangerous. But I’m oldfashioned that way.
12 posted on
02/12/2010 11:22:37 AM PST by
mockingbyrd
(Sarah speaks for me!)
To: reaganaut1
There is no painless way out of this. And i just read where the Dims are going to try again to pass Health Care, again. This will be another Trillion Dollars that we do not have. The Chinese are worried and rightfully so. We do not have their money either. I guess we will just have to trade them States, for debt. How much for Hawaii ?
13 posted on
02/12/2010 11:36:01 AM PST by
dbrew2u
To: reaganaut1
I think we've just found the motto for putting a stop to the insane borrowing binge!!
HOW MUCH FOR HAWAII?
14 posted on
02/12/2010 11:56:33 AM PST by
DNME
(Remember, we are still under a state of national emergency for H1N1! Remain vigilant!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson