Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

The mainstream media not saying a peep about this.
1 posted on 02/16/2010 10:20:08 AM PST by ezfindit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: ezfindit

Destruction of human life coverage is obviously not a top priority for the leftist and pro-death mainstream media.


2 posted on 02/16/2010 10:21:04 AM PST by ezfindit (ConservativeDatingSite.com - The Right Place for Conservative Singles)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ezfindit

Arnold is a cretin. $3 billion to pacify the baby-killers and subsidize the death doctors. How’d that work out for ya?


3 posted on 02/16/2010 10:23:27 AM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ezfindit
Six years later, after destroying innumerable embryos and devaluing human life, they have nothing to show for their investment.

Unless that was the object. They are Marxists, after all.

5 posted on 02/16/2010 10:33:39 AM PST by Navy Patriot (Sarah and the Conservatives will rock your world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ezfindit

But the embyonic stem cell may yet help reduce climate change, solve the the mystery of backgound comic radiation and the evolution of the two thumbed glove.

They shouldn’t give up yeti.


8 posted on 02/16/2010 10:41:10 AM PST by count-your-change (You don't have be brilliant, not being stupid is enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ezfindit

While not using fetal stem cells, I would suspect that there is a future in using, or banking, “infantile” stem cells, taken from the umbilical cord after birth, for example, and continuing on from there.

Here’s the broad concept. There are many times in people’s lives when they have some invasive medical procedure or other. But typically when such things happen, the medical waste, including large numbers of their stem cells, are discarded as waste. So why not save it, or at least save the stem cells?

Different stem cells can often be adapted to grow into other cells, that might be the very best way to repair a person’s tissues years down the road. For example, saving a child’s baby teeth stem cells might provide a means for them to fight off cancer many years later.

Or when a child breaks a bone, which does happen, before the bone is set, why not bank some of their exposed bone marrow? Sure, if done regularly, it could delay the setting of the bone by some minutes, but it is not a quick procedure in any event, so would hardly even be inconvenient.

Any time a person gets general anesthetic, even to have their wisdom teeth removed, for example, take the opportunity to harvest some stem cells, hither and yon. Some from the stomach, the liver, etc.

Most of such banked stem cells will never be needed, but there is a good chance that some of them will be needed.


10 posted on 02/16/2010 10:44:46 AM PST by yefragetuwrabrumuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ezfindit
Researchers have been buying "fetal" cell tissue from abortionists for years. And heads and various body parts.

I wonder what the MSM would do if they knew the truth?

14 posted on 02/16/2010 10:55:31 AM PST by Slyfox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ezfindit; All

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2426986/posts


17 posted on 02/16/2010 11:08:28 AM PST by raptor22 (The truth will set us free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ezfindit

“Without so much as a press release, Embryonic Stem Cell research is being slowly defunded by the State of California. “

That’s because the federal govt is now funding it.


18 posted on 02/16/2010 11:23:03 AM PST by Kirkwood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson