Posted on 02/17/2010 8:27:21 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
The Republican presidential nominee, an Arizona senator, was a maverick, which was part of his charm. He spoke and acted impulsively, which was part of his problem. Voters thought his entertaining dimensions might be incompatible with presidential responsibilities. For example, he selected a running mate most Americans had never heard of and who had negligible experience pertinent to the presidency. This was 1964.
Barry Goldwater, whose seat John McCain occupies, chose to run with Bill Miller, a congressman from Lockport, N.Y., near Buffalo. Miller, Goldwater cheerfully explained, annoyed Lyndon Johnson. After the Goldwater-Miller ticket lost 44 states, Miller retired to Lockport, where he practiced law and lived in dignified anonymity until his death in 1983. Although he had served as an assistant prosecutor of Nazi war criminals at Nuremberg and spent seven terms in Congress, no one suggested he should be considered for the 1968 Republican presidential nomination.
Yet Sarah Palin, who with 17 months remaining in her single term as Alaska's governor quit the only serious office she has ever held, is obsessively discussed as a possible candidate in 2012. Why? She is not going to be president and will not be the Republican nominee unless the party wants to lose at least 44 states.
Conservatives, who rightly respect markets as generally reliable gauges of consumer preferences, should notice that the political market is speaking clearly: The more attention Palin receives, the fewer Americans consider her presidential timber. The latest Post-ABC News poll shows that 71 percent of Americans -- including 52 percent of Republicans -- think she is not qualified to be president.(continued)
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...
Interesting, you think I care what you think.
George Will isn’t taking irrelevance very gracefully, is he!
CLASSIC! (snickering)
Dorothy Rabinowitz has a column asserting that Reagan never appealed to resentment. Now George Will is promoting the meme.
BALONEY! Anybody can look up Reagan’s 1980 Acceptance Speech. It’s hard to believe the Republican Convention was in Detroit that year.
Reagan’s indictment of Carter’s “economic stew that has turned the national stomach” is elegant and damning.
There was PLENTY of resentment and fear—both in the country AND in Reagan’s 1980 campaign.
Most campaign years there’s a lot of commentary about “positive” and “negative” campaigning. BALONEY! What matters is: Is it TRUE?
And he’s doing a bad @ss job of it - and it’s impossible for him to do a good job for America because he HATES America! What he has done ‘so far’ is proof. A con man Marxist as president of the USA and his voters are wondering when is the economy going to turn around since they are out of a job and homeless.
After throwing a party for the con man Marxists, a little man sits in his mansion and tells his readers what they think is good is really bad - after all, ‘he’ knows. The con man’s mantra - ‘he knows best’.
This jazz about “qualified” is another bit of BALONEY!
A person who understands economics, who knows how to run a business, who has sound moral convictions, and who loves the country, is qualified to be President.
A Communist, baby-killing race-baiter who hates the United States is unqualified to be President.
They use ‘qualified’ because they have nothing against Sarah. Your list is perfect and speaks for itself. Their problem is and they know it ... she is MORE than qualified and her love of America gives her true grit!
Will is wrong on this one.
Exactly!
Well, George Will finally outs himself. Feckle East Coast idiots.
He’s the dork at the party wearing short pants, white socks and brown penny loafers and eating foie gras on peanut butter cookies.
George, Orville Reddenbacher wants his bow-tie back. It is cutting off the oxygen to your brain.
It seems to me that all these posts from effeminate Ivy League snobs like Will should have mandatory barf alerts. That will save me the trouble of starting to read one.
“The president-elect (Obama) arrived at the Chevy Chase, Md., home of syndicated columnist George Will shortly after 6:30 p.m., according to a press pool report. Greeting him at the residence were other luminaries of the conservative commentariat, including the Weekly Standard’s William Kristol, New York Times columnist David Brooks, and Charles Krauthammer of the Washington Post.”
With the exception of Kristol, I will predict that the other three (Will, Brooks and quite possibly Krauthammer) will endorse Obama for reelection over Palin. This election is shaping up not as liberal versus conservative(although Will etc are not what I would call conservative) but as elite versus populist, similar to the Jackson versus John Quincy Adams election of 1828.(BTW, the elites lost that one 57-43, losing the entire country except.....you guessed it the Northeast)
“Besides, full-throated populism has not won a national election in 178 years, since Andrew Jackson was reelected in 1832.”
This guy will is an Oxford don, with a PH.D from Princeton, an elitist snob to the core and yet he is historically illiterate. Although he was involved in the election as I was, he does not realize that 1980 was such an election. (of course, I think he does realize it and refuses to acknowledge it both because it is so recent that it could be repeated and Palin is just the kind of candidate to repeat it.) Matthew Continetti had an excellent article in the weekly standard analyzing the Jackson-Adams election, Bryan-McKinley and Reagan-Carter elections , concluding that all involved populist versus elite contests and that the populist had prevailed in 1828 and 1980.
The elites such as Will and his ilk, try to present the electorate with two alternatives, both of which are guaranteed to maintain the elite’s power. That is what Will’s idiotic column and many others are about. He would love to present the country with the choice of two elitists, Romney and Obama. That way, the Establishment wins before the first vote is counted.
This is so patently untrue! Gov. Palin has showed ten times the competence of any Washingtonian while gaining heavy EXPERIENCE in governing!
George Will is here participating in a BIG LIE! He talks like a Liberal or, more likely, a NWO.
Where in Texas?
But after his showing in Iowa, the press anointed Obama as Once and Future King and and offered only adoring press coverage from that point onward. That will not happen with Palin.
None of the other R candidates will get any better, so that argument is a non starter.
Yep.
“One could make the argument that it’s really only since we started electing yahoos from the lower class like Johnson, Nixon, Carter, Clinton, and Obama that this country has gone to hell in a handbasket.”
Clinton may have started out lower class, but when his mom married his stepdad, Clinton became part of the upper class. Also, Obama spent all his time with his mom Ann Durham, and she was from a well to do white family. I doubt that either of them were truly lower class. Also, all of the pol you mentioned were liberals, except for Nixon. I doubt that Palin is like him in ay way.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.