Posted on 02/24/2010 2:53:40 PM PST by Former Military Chick
WASHINGTON—(ENEWSPF)—February 24, 2010. Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee Chairman Joe Lieberman, ID-Conn., and Ranking Member Susan Collins, R-Me., Wednesday questioned the Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security about the high ratio of contractors to civilian employees within the DHS workforce.
According to DHS estimates, the first the Committee has received despite years of informal requests for these numbers, the Department has 188,000 civilian employees (not including uniformed members of the Coast Guard) and 200,000 contractors working for it – for a total workforce of almost 400,000.
“To me, this is just a shocking and unacceptable number,” Lieberman said at a Committee hearing called to discuss the Departments proposed FY2011 budget. “Our Committee has long been concerned about DHS’s heavy reliance on contractors because it raises the question of efficient use of taxpayer money but also the question of who is in control of the Department’s mission: Is it federal contractors or fulltime employees?”
Lieberman said he appreciated that DHS has recently undertaken a review of the skewed balance of DHS workers. But he noted, “This is just the beginning of a turnaround that is necessary.” Lieberman and Collins have requested an agency by agency breakdown of the ratio of federal civilian employees and contractors.
Collins reiterated her proposal, offered with Lieberman, to transfer money budgeted for terrorist trials in New York City to the Coast Guard budget. “The President proposes to slash the Coast Guard’s funding by $75 million below last year’s budget and reduce the number of uniformed personnel by more than 1,100 positions,” she said. “Instead of wasting millions of taxpayer dollars on civilian trials in large American cities for the Guantanamo detainees, that $200 million would be better spent on the Coast Guard. “As we look forward, it is clear that the Coast Guard’s role in homeland security missions will only expand.”
Lieberman praised the proposed 2.67 percent increase in the Administration’s FY2011 DHS budget, which represents a reversal of FY2010 projections showing a steady decline in DHS funding over the next five years. The FY2011 budget now projects a small increase in DHS funding for the next five years, based in part on an increase of aviation security fees, which Lieberman said he would support “to benefit the budget of the Department of Homeland Security.”
Both Senators also questioned a proposed 5 percent cut for cyber security in the face of rampant hostile intrusions into private and public sector information systems and data theft. The Senators are working on comprehensive cyber security legislation that will, among other things, strengthen DHS’s ability to protect the nation’s computer networks.
DHS “must greatly expand its capacity to take on this threat,” Collins said. “Yet, the budget for the National Cyber Security Division would be reduced by $19 million next year, a reduction that flies in the face of the growing cyber threat. Our nation’s top intelligence officials recently testified that it is ‘certain’ that al Qaeda is planning another attack against the United States within the next six months. In the face of this testimony, we must ensure that the Department’s budget priorities are aligned to counter the threats we face from a determined enemy.”
Source: hsgac.senate.gov
Although, with contractors I doubt they get a pension from the taxpayer, I could be wrong.
This is because the feds never hire qualified people. All they ever do is hire bean counters and project manager types. The only criteria seems to be a college degree.
This is because the feds never hire qualified people. All they ever do is hire bean counters and project manager types. The only criteria seems to be a college degree.
They have to contract out to get the actual work done.
The child president is playing with fire ignoring the nations security.
I’m shocked, shocked I tell you!
Contractors are hired through companies, the taxpayer pays the bill which is usually cheaper than footing the bill for a civil servant. Contractors don’t get all the bennies and can be fired anytime.
If Lieberman was concerned that 400,000 employees is too many than I might give him some credit.
Government has really gone off the deep end when there are 400,000 people employed in Homeland Security.
I’d say that contract workers are better than federal employees, because they can be fired if they screw up. And they probably cost less.
Keep in mind that on most matters, Lieberman is a flaming liberal.
Between Obama and Osama they are driving us to financial destrution. They both have the same game plan from the same game book.
I’m confused! They don’t like the ratio on employees to contract employees, so do they want to convert contract to regular employees? (I think yes, expand government)
do they have to pay contractors health benefits and retirement? If not, I say go for it.
The rats are feverishly trying to make it fed law that only contractors with union shops providing healthcare and pensions can receive a government contract. There’s a recent (last few days) thread about it around here somewhere.
I think zero and the rats would like to convert those jobs to permanent fed employee positions.
Funny how the market works, don’t it.
Make it too expensive to hire full time and what do you get, contract workers! Amazing.
Obama should commission a study.
In other words.... “We need more useless union help”.
We never should have created the DHS. All we needed to do was reform and improve the agencies we already had in place. All we did with the DHS was come up with another federal ‘money pit’ that will be there to take blame by finger pointing from other agencies when something goes wrong, and provide additional people for congressional committees to use for grandstanding when there’s a problem. Lots of union workers and political kickbacks, and at the end of the day we aren’t a dammed bit safer.
PING
Sickening.
The list, ping
This is kind of weird because I know many depts, military for instance, outsource alot. I believe, although I could be wrong, that it’s generally cheaper.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.