Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A new paper comparing NCDC rural and urban US surface temperature data
Wattsupwiththat ^ | 26 February, 2010 | Anthony Watts

Posted on 02/28/2010 9:08:33 AM PST by marktwain

There’s a new paper out by Dr. Edward Long that does some interesting comparisons to NCDC’s raw data (prior to adjustments) that compares rural and urban station data, both raw and adjusted in the CONUS.

The paper is titled Contiguous U.S. Temperature Trends Using NCDC Raw and Adjusted Data for One-Per-State Rural and Urban Station Sets. In it, Dr. Edward Long states:

“The problem would seem to be the methodologies engendered in treatment for a mix of urban and rural locations; that the ‘adjustment’ protocol appears to accent to a warming effect rather than eliminate it. This, if correct, leaves serious doubt for whether the rate of increase in temperature found from the adjusted data is due to natural warming trends or warming because of another reason, such as erroneous consideration of the effects of urban warming.”

Here is the comparison of raw rural and urban data:

(Excerpt) Read more at wattsupwiththat.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: climate; data; globalwarming; ncdc
This portrayal of the study shows us some remarkable graphs from the paper, and gives us links to the actual paper (PDF). I downloaded the PDF, and it is very good. If you are interested in the details, it lists all the sites in the study.
1 posted on 02/28/2010 9:08:33 AM PST by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: marktwain; tubebender; marvlus; Genesis defender; markomalley; Carlucci; grey_whiskers; meyer; ...
 


Beam me to Planet Gore !

2 posted on 02/28/2010 9:11:43 AM PST by steelyourfaith (Warmists as "traffic light" apocalyptics: "Greens too yellow to admit they're really Reds."-Monckton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: steelyourfaith

Unfortunately, the link does not go directly to the story mentioned. You have to scroll five stories down to see it.

Here is a link to climate-skeptic, that has it on the front page:

http://www.climate-skeptic.com/


3 posted on 02/28/2010 9:16:17 AM PST by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Basicly, like the federal government, envirowacko ‘science’ is a complete waste of time, energy, resources, paper, etc. While a complete recall of all laws (gummit), and all envirowacko papers ever written (AGW) would be a good start, further effort would still be a waste of time. The planet Earth has been around a long time, will be around a long time, and will continue to do what it does, when it wants to do it! Man has essentially no influence at all. Mo bettah to study things like reality. Living (health) is also a good thing to study. Making things might also be fun. Envirowacko ‘science’, is not even worth reading, now that the con has been outted. If you’re into that kind of thing, tho’ ‘The History of Snake Oil’ might be enlightening.


4 posted on 02/28/2010 10:49:41 AM PST by CRBDeuce (here, while the internet is still free of the Fairness Doctrine)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: marktwain

Fudge factors strike again.


5 posted on 02/28/2010 2:59:51 PM PST by HiTech RedNeck (I am in America but not of America (per bible: am in the world but not of it))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson