Any judicial action against Orly is a direct result of her own actions and not malicious prosecution or persecution. As far as the persecution by Obama supporters, she can’t sue Obama for their actions.
You and Orly need to read the cases you cite instead of just cherry picking quotes that seem to agree with you.
The holding in that case is:
Other unusual situations calling for federal intervention might also arise, but there is no point in our attempting now to specify what they might be. It is sufficient for purposes of the present case to hold, as we do, that the possible unconstitutionality of a statute “on its face” does not, in itself, justify an injunction against good faith attempts to enforce it, and that appellee Harris has failed to make any showing of bad faith, harassment, or any other unusual circumstance that would call for equitable relief. Because our holding rests on the absence of the factors necessary under equitable principles to justify federal intervention, we have no occasion to consider whether 28 U.S.C. § 2283, which prohibits an injunction against state court proceedings “except as expressly authorized by Act of Congress” would, in and of itself, be controlling under the circumstances of this case.
ROTF Admits standing lol it corrects a typo referring to the defendant as "her" not "him".
Sven stop clutching for glass straws in a snowdrift.