Posted on 03/04/2010 3:01:46 PM PST by AdmSmith
New quake 20 minutes ago
ANTOFAGASTA, CHILE Distances 63 km (39 miles) ENE (73°) from Calama, Chile 257 km (159 miles) NE (55°) from Antofagasta, Chile 296 km (184 miles) SE (142°) from Iquique, Chile 1133 km (704 miles) WNW (284°) from ASUNCION, Paraguay Location Uncertainty horizontal +/- 15.8 km (9.8 miles); depth +/- 8.7 km (5.4 miles) Parameters NST=325, Nph=336, Dmin=66.8 km, Rmss=0.7 sec, Gp=
That was a ref to the earlier earthquake.
not that i know of. :(
Apparently it’s not an aftershock but a whole different earthquake in a completely different section of Chile. Which is even scarier!
the whole pacific rim is going nuts! (donning tin-foil hat) ;^)
According to this article no damage to people nor property:
I’m not so sure about that.
Ping
So, I was trying to talk my husband in to retiring in Chile.....
Is the depth really 105.1 km?
According to USGS the depth was 105.1 km (65.3 miles)
read more about measurements: http://earthquake.usgs.gov/learn/topics/measure.php
GREAT web program. Thanks!
no prob :)
Would make a great fake curse word. “Antofagasta!”
*When these earthquakes are done* the tension in the grund is lower
“Would make a great fake curse word. Antofagasta!”
Hey! Antofagasta” is my middle name!
If it is the 3D one listed above, I just used the scroll button on my mouse and it zoomed in.
No, I do not think so. The energy source for an earthquake is tectonic strain accumulated by the relative motion of Earth’s tectonic plates which is driven by mantle heat flow in the presence of the earth’s gravitational field. This is not normally shown as temperature increase on the surface, except perhaps for a slight increase in temperature for a while.
YIKES!
MAG UTC DATE-TIME
y/m/d h:m:s LAT
deg LON
deg DEPTH
km Region
MAP 6.3 2010/03/04 22:39:26 -22.330 -68.340 105.1 ANTOFAGASTA, CHILE
MAP 5.1 2010/03/04 19:28:39 -34.278 -72.518 35.0 OFFSHORE LIBERTADOR O’HIGGINS, CHILE
MAP 5.3 2010/03/04 17:37:50 -34.049 -71.997 35.0 OFFSHORE LIBERTADOR O’HIGGINS, CHILE
MAP 6.4 2010/03/04 14:02:31 -13.616 167.135 200.2 VANUATU
MAP 5.1 2010/03/04 10:53:52 -35.522 -69.808 10.7 MENDOZA, ARGENTINA
MAP 5.0 2010/03/04 09:39:43 -1.448 145.458 59.7 ADMIRALTY ISLANDS REG., PAPUA NEW GUINEA
MAP 5.0 2010/03/04 09:36:39 -12.041 166.282 97.0 SANTA CRUZ ISLANDS
MAP 5.1 2010/03/04 09:03:42 -37.495 -74.556 35.0 OFFSHORE BIO-BIO, CHILE
MAP 5.1 2010/03/04 08:16:18 22.959 120.572 35.0 TAIWAN
MAP 6.1 2010/03/04 01:59:51 -33.154 -72.064 34.4 OFFSHORE VALPARAISO, CHILE
MAP 6.4 2010/03/04 00:18:52 22.903 120.823 23.1 TAIWAN
We do seem to have had a lot of earthquakes in a lot of different areas recently. Must be because of the melting glaciers.
:-)
Yes, the Democrats call it Bush's fault.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.