Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

ERIC MASSA DUPES THE CONSERVATIVES
boblonsberry.com ^ | 03/09/10 | Bob Lonsberry

Posted on 03/09/2010 5:24:34 AM PST by shortstop

Eric Massa is a snake.

But he is a brilliant snake.

And in one of the most audacious p.r. moves ever, he has conned Limbaugh, Drudge and Beck – and untold millions of Americans. From a little radio studio beside a swamp, with the help of a couple of deluded backwoods yokels, he has made himself a national star.It is astounding.

And proof that in American politics, it’s not how big your lie is, it’s how loud you can yell.

And so it is that Eric Massa, who fled the Congress out of fear of what Ethics Committee investigators would find out about him, has wrapped himself in the robes of a patriot martyr.

A guy who – until yesterday – belonged to the House Progressive Caucus has, with one nicely disseminated rant, transformed himself into a conservative darling. Limbaugh and Beck have trumpeted him, and Beck has promised him an entire hour of national television tonight. Massa opposed Obamacare because it wasn’t liberal enough – because it didn’t entirely nationalize health care with a single-payer system – and Beck is about to crown him queen of the tea party.

It is a media move of astounding proportion. It takes spin to a whole new level.And it shows Massa to be a genius.

And, if anybody’s paying attention, a liar.

But, nobody is paying attention, and his con is working.

But for the record, a few facts.

The first is that over the space of five days Eric Massa gave three completely different explanations for why he was leaving the House of Representatives. Each was passionately delivered, each was earnestly intoned, and each was mutually exclusive.

That means they can’t all be true.

For example, on Wednesday, he announced that he would not seek re-election. He said it was because his cancer was back. He implied that he was dying and that his doctor had told him that his workload was killing him.

By Friday, however, it wasn’t cancer anymore, and it wasn’t just no re-election. It was resignation. He said he had to “own this reality,” acknowledged that he had done something that made him unworthy of office, and that his background contained events that congressional investigators would uncover if they looked into him.

Let’s review. Wednesday it was cancer, Friday it was personal failing.

And Sunday it was a conspiracy.

On Sunday, he drove to radio station WKPQ for his weekly show. Coincidentally, both his chief of staff and I have worked at WKPQ. With him were two radio people who have been sympathetic to his cause and his campaigns.

And Eric Massa went off.

He claimed that he was being forced out of the House because he voted against health-care reform. In some sort of grand plot involving the chief of staff of the White House and the House majority leader and any number of other mystery Democrats, he was being crucified.

It was his courage and independence, he claimed, that had made him a marked man. He dared to stand up to Obama, and to be his own man, and they were crushing him. He was a poor victim of evil Democrats.

And he said the f-word once.

And that’s why he was quitting the Congress.

And no sooner was the show done, with its listenership in the dozens, than somebody started sending links to it all across the media world.

By 8 yesterday morning, Fox News Channel had bought the narrative. Here was a Democrat, destroyed by Democrats, for voting against health care.

Glenn Beck fell in love next. Then Rush Limbaugh.

All accepting the Eric Massa claim that he was the deciding vote on health care, and that by silencing him the Democrats were trying to force big government on the people, and that the public will was being destroyed.

The problem, of course, was that it was absolutely untrue – and anybody with a grasp of Google could verify that.

Eric Massa was one of 39 House Democrats who voted against health care reform. A third of those Democrats were, like Massa, newly elected. All but one of them was, like Massa, from districts that voted for John McCain. A good chunk of them were, like Massa, in districts which had recently elected Republicans.

Of the 39 Democrats who opposed health care reform, Eric Massa had the fifth-smallest margin of electoral victory.

Put another way, he won the seat by the skin of his teeth and if he didn’t mind his P’s and Q’s, he would lose it.

So he was expected to vote against health care. His constituents didn’t want it, and he had to oppose it. That was understood by all, including the Democratic leadership of the House.

As to the looming vote, at least a dozen of the House Democrats who opposed health care before have already said they oppose it now. That means, not counting Massa, there are a dozen Democrats defying their party.

And what is the party doing to them?

Nothing. Other than plenty of sweet talking, and dinner at the White House over the weekend.

The claim that Massa is being taken down for voting against health care, while others who did the same thing are being treated kindly and even rewarded, is preposterous.

It is an illogical and unbelievable lie.

And conservatives eager to find an ally against Obamacare have latched on to it like it was God’s own truth.

And Eric Massa is a hero. Millions of conservatives have embraced a liberal who defies everything they stand for, and he has become the sweetheart of Beck and Limbaugh. Last night, Beck breathlessly Tweeted the news that he had spoken to Massa off the air and was excited to have him for an entire hour on TV tonight.

I wouldn’t be surprised if somebody offers him a TV commentator job somewhere. And I wouldn’t be surprised if he keeps getting away with it. If Limbaugh and Beck say he’s OK – and they will have to now, to save face – then millions of people will think he’s OK too.

Eric Massa is a brilliant, audacious snake.

But he is still a snake.


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: lonsberry; massa; obamacare
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-125 next last
To: Miss Didi

Exactly! bttt


81 posted on 03/09/2010 6:48:44 AM PST by Matchett-PI (Sowell's book, Intellectuals and Society, eviscerates the fantasies that uphold leftist thought)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: altura
What we are enjoying is the exposure of the viciousness of the left and the deliciousness of infighting among the dems.

Exactly right.

82 posted on 03/09/2010 6:49:53 AM PST by Bahbah (Only dead fish go with the flow)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Huck

Oh, I agree with that. Us, lowly citizens don’t really know what’s going on behind closed doors.


83 posted on 03/09/2010 6:50:00 AM PST by caver (Obama: Home of the Whopper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: MozarkDawg
on board ship, they don't have the shower stalls laid out as they do in a locker room

Guys don't have "stalls." We have a large room with a bunch of shower-heads spaced along the walls.

ML/NJ

84 posted on 03/09/2010 6:50:35 AM PST by ml/nj
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: pnh102
Hey at least it is one less Democrat. Perhaps we should rejoice in that.

Just remember that when the House is reduced by two members, you need one less for a majority. Could be some really close vote countin' goin' on.

85 posted on 03/09/2010 6:52:01 AM PST by Roccus (Hawaii Hall of Records safe from tsunami......Obama saddened.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Huck
He reminds me of Blagovich

He sure does! I thought of Blago, too. Maybe both, Blago and Massa will spill the beans on the corruption!

86 posted on 03/09/2010 6:53:02 AM PST by Jaidyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: shortstop

“From a little radio studio beside a swamp, with the help of a couple of deluded backwoods yokels...”

Is there anything that can’t be blamed on rural folks? I can’t imagine why the sophisticated city people haven’t exterminated us yet. We’re the source of all ills.


87 posted on 03/09/2010 6:53:41 AM PST by Spike Knotts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Roccus
Just remember that when the House is reduced by two members, you need one less for a majority. Could be some really close vote countin' goin' on.

True, but I have a feeling that had he stayed, he'd have voted for 0bamacare anyway. If Massa really cared about this issue, he would not have resigned and instead stayed on to vote NO.

88 posted on 03/09/2010 6:55:44 AM PST by pnh102 (Regarding liberalism, always attribute to malice what you think can be explained by stupidity. - Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: pnh102
Trusting a democrat to keep to his word on a vote is a fools wish.

The only good democrat is an out-of-office democrat.

89 posted on 03/09/2010 6:56:21 AM PST by AU72
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: stephenjohnbanker

The guy has been in congress less than one term. Where is the evidence that he is actually a “progressive” wearing conservative clothing now versus your typical garden variety common political whore who will simply change spots to further their career?


90 posted on 03/09/2010 6:58:25 AM PST by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: AU72
Trusting a democrat to keep to his word on a vote is a fools wish.

The only good democrat is an out-of-office democrat.

Thank you.

91 posted on 03/09/2010 7:00:42 AM PST by pnh102 (Regarding liberalism, always attribute to malice what you think can be explained by stupidity. - Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: shortstop; Matchett-PI; All
Looks like Massa may not be the best of DEM/Socialist messengers, but that does not mean that he is not telling the truth about what has happened to him at the hands of the Socialist leadership.

Listen to Massa tonight on Glenn Beck and then later on Larry King. It could be we might come to believe he is telling the truth about what has happened to him in the attempt to get him to vote YES on the health care bill. He was already not being a nice boy in Nancy's opinion since he voted against BO’s budget, cap and trade, and the first House health care bill.

http://www.breitbart.tv/rep-massa-blast-dems-he-was-set-up-hoyer-lied-may-rescind-resignation

What do you think Nancy does to make her House members follow her lead? And Emmanual? And Obama?

92 posted on 03/09/2010 7:01:00 AM PST by seekthetruth (Support Ed Lynch In FL Dist.19; Dan Fanelli In FL Dist. 8 ; Allen West in FL Dist. 22!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shortstop
Speaking of mutually exclusive lies, Bob Lons(dingle)berry.

Which is it, did Massa vote against 0bamacare because it wasn't liberal enough as Bob Lonsberry first asserted; or was it because his electoral victory was very narrow in a district that went for McCain and he had to ‘mind his P's and Q's’?

Well?

In an article calling someone out for telling lies that contradict each other, it might help to not employ the tactic yourself Bob Dingleberry.

93 posted on 03/09/2010 7:02:27 AM PST by allmendream (Income is EARNED not distributed. So how could it be re-distributed?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vigilanteman
Where is the evidence that he is actually a “progressive” wearing conservative clothing now versus your typical garden variety common political whore who will simply change spots to further their career?

He's a Democrat. That's all the evidence we need.

Remember how many "moderate" or even "conservative" Democrats there supposedly were in the Senate prior to the first votes on 0bamacare? Heck, it almost felt like most of the Democrat caucus in the Senate was "moderate" or "conservative" the way they were talking.

Any notion that "moderate" or "conservative" Democrats are nothing more than mythical creatures should have died the day when all 60 of them voted to advance 0bamacare. As for the House, we're starting to see the same thing happen with more Democrats caving towards voting for this.

The only people being fooled are the ones who continue to believe that there are "moderate" or "conservative" Democrats who will swoop in and save the day.

94 posted on 03/09/2010 7:04:17 AM PST by pnh102 (Regarding liberalism, always attribute to malice what you think can be explained by stupidity. - Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: flaglady47
I saw exactly the same thing!

Talk about mutually contradictory stories!

Bob Lonsdingleberry is a loon!

95 posted on 03/09/2010 7:05:03 AM PST by allmendream (Income is EARNED not distributed. So how could it be re-distributed?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: shortstop

There is nothing hard about this. Massa was prepared to cast a no vote on healthcare reform in its present form.

Rahm sicked the dogs on Massa’s past and they uncovered something that Massa would rather keep private.

End of story. And if they were not able to uncover something, they probably would have manufactured it.

It is all just more support for the arguement that the “whole nest” of rats need to be shown the door.


96 posted on 03/09/2010 7:06:42 AM PST by fightu4it (conquest by immigration and subversion spells the end of US.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shortstop; LS

My guess would be Massa voted against it because he was fearful it would cost he his seat. He was gonna have a tough time in his district no matter what.


97 posted on 03/09/2010 7:08:51 AM PST by Impy (RED=COMMUNIST, NOT REPUBLICAN | NO "INDIVIDUAL MANDATE"!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LS
I have to say, I was skeptical about jumping on this guy (no pun intended) because of the numerous allegations against him regarding sexual impropriety.

Is it time for America to move past "sexual impropriety" when evaluating a politician's ability to legislate? Is there a better litmus test?

98 posted on 03/09/2010 7:09:21 AM PST by TaxRelief (Walmart: Keeping my family healthy and on-budget since 1993.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: fullchroma

perhaps the whole naked shower scene is Massa telegraphing that Rham emanuel has his own naked skeletons.


99 posted on 03/09/2010 7:09:32 AM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: shortstop; LS

Never mind, it was just because it wasn’t liberal enough. He wants it Canada style.


100 posted on 03/09/2010 7:12:05 AM PST by Impy (RED=COMMUNIST, NOT REPUBLICAN | NO "INDIVIDUAL MANDATE"!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-125 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson