Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

ERIC MASSA DUPES THE CONSERVATIVES
boblonsberry.com ^ | 03/09/10 | Bob Lonsberry

Posted on 03/09/2010 5:24:34 AM PST by shortstop

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-125 next last
To: shortstop

No, Massa dupes or duped those who call themselves Conservatives. True Conservatives see theough him. How/ He is a Democrat, that is all they need to know.


61 posted on 03/09/2010 6:20:02 AM PST by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bahbah

I never heard of the guy and have yet to give him a kiss, much less a hug.

What we are enjoying is the exposure of the viciousness of the left and the deliciousness of infighting among the dems.


62 posted on 03/09/2010 6:20:33 AM PST by altura
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: shortstop

And, if anybody’s paying attention, a liar.
__________

Why are all the liberals so surprised at the malcontent going on in their own party. It is a historical fact that thieves, pirates and gangsta’s eventually turn on each other and self-destruct...this den of thieves has been accumulating since 1964. Hopefully THIS TIME they will be sent scuttling back to Chicago to hide out like they did in the McCarthy era...they’re like the Islamofascists. Periodically they have to be slapped down so the world can rest a bit.


63 posted on 03/09/2010 6:21:45 AM PST by RowdyFFC (The opinion of a wise Welshtino woman...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shortstop

He didn’t con me. I like hearing him call Rahm the devil’s spawn. LOL. That much is true.


64 posted on 03/09/2010 6:22:21 AM PST by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shortstop
Limbaugh and Beck have trumpeted him

Rush likes his forthrightness in describing Rahm's style of politics. That's the extent of Rush's "trumpeting".

65 posted on 03/09/2010 6:24:17 AM PST by Cletus.D.Yokel (Freepmail me to get on the Bourbon ping list.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stephenjohnbanker

‘“Eric Massa is a brilliant, audacious snake.”

He ain’t fooling FReepers, and I doubt he is fooling any talk show guys either. He is a useful idiot, and WE will play him, not the other way around ;-)

This author is an idiot.’

Two dynamics are at work here. Massa is both protecting himself with this tactic, and he is engaging in “catch back” against Emmanuel and Pelosi, who he believes threw him under the bus.

The second dynamic is the reaction of Rush, Beck, et al. They are not praising the guy. They are using him to unilaterally disarm Emmanuel and the “Chicago way”. Any vote switchers now will be scrutinized to see whether they had some skeleton in their closet and Emmanuel will not be free to practice this disgusting form of politics without fear that he will be exposed for doing so.

These revelations about Rahm look like they could be a brilliant move by Massa. But their use by the conservative punditry is most definitely a brilliant strategic move against Obamacare.


66 posted on 03/09/2010 6:24:34 AM PST by Brices Crossroads (Politico and)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: shortstop

If Massa is as brilliant and devious as this author states then why would he want to expose him so quickly?


67 posted on 03/09/2010 6:25:04 AM PST by sydbas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pnh102
I have no doubt that some Dems were "allowed" to vote against the bill the first time. However, it would also be cyncial to believe that all Dems will vote as they are directed by Pelosi. If it were that easy, there would already be a bill on the President's desk.

There is opposition to the bill within the Dem party. Some believe it does not go far enough while others think it goes too far. The House bill contained the public option. The Senate bill does not. Many Obama deadlines have come and gone. The real question is how many Dems are willing to jump off the cliff with Obama.

I am in the camp that believes there will be a bill that is passed. The only question is what will be in it. The Dems are wrestling with that now and they have two weeks to come up with the answer.

68 posted on 03/09/2010 6:25:12 AM PST by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: MozarkDawg
I hope Glenn doesn't let him spout off about the things he AGREES with Obama on. Might be a setup for pushing some things we don't want to be aired in favor of the evil one while on prime Fox time for a full hour.

Also, why haven't some of these people wired themselves and taped stuff that has been said by not only Rahm but Obama, etc? Makes one wonder just what stuff certain people have on Obama and company.

69 posted on 03/09/2010 6:25:27 AM PST by Evil Slayer (Onward, Christian soldiers, marching as to war)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: Brices Crossroads

I agree on all counts.


70 posted on 03/09/2010 6:26:50 AM PST by stephenjohnbanker (Support our troops, and vote out the RINOS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: shortstop
So he was expected to vote against health care. His constituents didn’t want it, and he had to oppose it. That was understood by all, including the Democratic leadership of the House.

Understood? Ha! The leadership already stated they didn't care if you lost your job during the next elections....just vote "yea".

This statement alone is a lie.

71 posted on 03/09/2010 6:27:19 AM PST by CAluvdubya (We need a Commander-in-Chief, not a professor of Law standing at a lectern-Palin 2010)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shortstop
Frankly I don't see this guy's point. Saying we are happy to see a scumbag like Massa expose Emanuel for what he is doesn't make him a conservative “darling.” It is just what it is nothing more nothing less: a Democrat got kicked out by other Democrats and squealed the truth about them as he walked out the door. This “conservative darling” stuff is a pile of pointless crap. Does this author now think we will run him in a special election as a Republican?
What does this expect will happen now that Massa has this new status?
If a scumbag Democrat falls in a little district in upstate New York and nobody cares, did anything really happen?
72 posted on 03/09/2010 6:28:23 AM PST by jmaroneps37 (Conservatism is truth. Liberalism is lies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ml/nj
But the locker room thing bothered me. I've been a men's locker room regular for more than half a century. I just came back from my gym. No guy I know would talk about missing curtains in the showers in his locker room. They simply do not exist; at least in any of the dozens of men's locker rooms I've been in. (Girls: I know you have them because in high school the visiting boys teams would use the girls locker room, at least when I was in high school.)

I am a woman, I've not spent any serious time in a men's locker room, but I did see the difference between the boy's and girl's version in high school, as you note, we had curtains, they didn't. I've seen college locker rooms, pro teams when the cameras go in to show us pre-game stuff, some after-game footage, I have never ever seen curtains or partitions of any kind in a men's locker room -- once upon a time I cleaned restrooms, I noted the ladies stalls had doors on them, the mens, nope, urinal right there as well.

In any kind of privacy discussion with my brothers, husband now, when I was younger I would ask them, "How can you just do that in front of other guys? Doesn't it bother you?" I have been told men/boys don't notice, don't look, there's no modesty question. Accepted -- and that is why this business of Massa and the lack of curtains in the House gym, I didn't understand the big deal he was making. Now, Rahm strolling in, literally butt nekkid, the poking a finger in the chest, to me that kind of power trip move, I wouldn't put past Rahm, but don't men walk around nekkid in locker rooms all the time? In full view of each other?? Is that really something that needs to be pointed out as so out of the ordinary??

73 posted on 03/09/2010 6:30:28 AM PST by MozarkDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Carley

or a dead fish


74 posted on 03/09/2010 6:30:59 AM PST by Doogle (USAF.68-73..8th TFW Ubon Thailand..never store a threat you should have eliminated)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: shortstop
A guy who – until yesterday – belonged to the House Progressive Caucus has, with one nicely disseminated rant, transformed himself into a conservative darling.

I don't think any conservatives have been duped by this assclown. We recognize him for the snake that he is. But at the same time, we also recognize that it is awfully convenient that his alleged sexual harassment of male staffers comes out in time to run him out of congress before he can vote against Obamacare again, and while he can still be replaced on the ballot in November. This doesn't make him a "darling" of the right, but we will still be happy to let him expose the hypocrisy and vitriol of the left.

75 posted on 03/09/2010 6:32:08 AM PST by VRWCmember
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ml/nj
I just asked my husband about this, the shower curtain stuff, he says it may be a Navy thing, that on board ship, they don't have the shower stalls laid out as they do in a locker room, there are very small, three-sided steel cubicles with a curtain in front. On his mine-sweeper ship, they had four. He wants to know how long Massa was in, how much time he spent on board?

My question to him, okay, I understand that, but then how many men's rooms, locker rooms, etc., has Massa been in since leaving the Navy, such that he still would expect shower curtains in the House gym?

Neither of us can answer each other -- but it would help the conversation, at any rate.

76 posted on 03/09/2010 6:42:37 AM PST by MozarkDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: shortstop; MinuteGal; seekthetruth; Brytani; Rafterman; surfer; Bob Ireland; gonzo; mcmuffin; ...
"“Millions of conservatives have embraced a liberal who defies everything they stand for, and he has become the sweetheart of ...Limbaugh.”

That is BULL. If he actually listened to Rush he would find his focus has never changed - it's on the infighting that is going on inside the 'RAT party from the top on down and Massa is merely the latest instance of it.

77 posted on 03/09/2010 6:42:46 AM PST by Matchett-PI (Sowell's book, Intellectuals and Society, eviscerates the fantasies that uphold leftist thought)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: shortstop

The three explanations are perfectly consistent with a man going through the process of working through denial.

I think its entirely possible that he found himself “owned” by Rahm and the Democratic party and that he thought he could eventually control his own destiny. They provided the money and support to get elected and in time he would have his own base that could lead to his independence. I am sure they had both a carrot and a stick.

Then the first health care bill put him in a position to be a pawn that would be sacrificed but he dodged the bullet because he was allowed to vote no PROVIDED he said the bill was too liberal. In other words a compromise that he could later spin to get conservative voters by saying he voted no and keep his liberal base by saying why he voted no.

All was well until Scott Brown comes along and there are not enough votes for health care, so he gets a visit from Rahm in the shower. Like a scene out of a Godfather movie, he was given a deal he could not refuse.

Could Massa be destroyed even if he was as clean as the white driven global warming snow? Of course. Was he clean ? Like all of us, no. Did they have dirt on him? Probably a prerequisite to get elected in the first place.

We have all seen what they can do when they want to destroy someone. Even Sara Palin was forced out.

Yes, I believe we have a mafia type organization running many of our congressmen are owned and Massa was one of them. I assume he is Italian descent and I assume they may have a fight on their hands because of the famous Italian temper/pride.


78 posted on 03/09/2010 6:44:43 AM PST by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stephenjohnbanker
Bravo!

The author is an idiot. WE, however, are not.

79 posted on 03/09/2010 6:44:46 AM PST by ohioWfan (Proud Mom of a Bronze Star recipient!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: GBA
Massa's 15 minutes of fame is all about slamming demonrat tactics. He gives conservatives yet another story of demonrat corruption and more negative pr about their rahming healthcare through against the wishes of we, the governed. Why wouldn't Beck or Limbaugh take advantage of the Massa opportunity to hurt the demonrats? When fate hands you an opportunity, you'd be foolish not to take it.

Spot on...so look for McCain and Steele to come out with a statement later today condemning Massa and his "crazy" shower story.
80 posted on 03/09/2010 6:45:14 AM PST by Miss Didi ("After all...tomorrow is another day." Scarlett O'Hara, Gone with the Wind)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-125 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson