To: neverdem
There is a missing element here. Epigenetics. Identical twins have different fingerprints due to variations in hormones, nutrients and other environmental exposure. The genome is simply a starting point. Granted, there may be directly detectable defects in the base sequence. That doesn't cover the active, dynamic state of that genome in the living phenotype.
3 posted on
03/10/2010 10:09:06 PM PST by
Myrddin
To: Myrddin
There is a missing element here. Epigenetics. Identical twins have different fingerprints due to variations in hormones, nutrients and other environmental exposure. The genome is simply a starting point. Granted, there may be directly detectable defects in the base sequence. That doesn't cover the active, dynamic state of that genome in the living phenotype.True, but I didn't take as the main points of the story, i.e. genome wide association studies were getting nowhere quickly, the need for whole genome sequencing and its decreasing price. They didn't have to deal with copy number variation either. IMHO, Mendelian genetics and whole genome sequencing worked in these diagnoses.
4 posted on
03/10/2010 11:39:05 PM PST by
neverdem
(Xin loi minh oi)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson