Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JustPiper

FANTASTIC! About time an individual state said that they will NOT consistently *take orders* from D.C.

We are the United StateS of America...not the United State.


129 posted on 03/12/2010 5:38:56 AM PST by azishot (J.D. Hayworth...U.S. Senator FOR Arizona...http://www.jdforsenate.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: azishot
If they didn't want to take orders from DC, they shouldn't have ratified the Constitution, with its supremacy clause, its unaccountable judiciary, its implied powers.

We are one state, with the old states being mere agencies or departments of that national state. "To the republic, for which it stands." Not to the republics. Or to the union. To the republic. Singular. That's the problem.

133 posted on 03/12/2010 5:51:39 AM PST by Huck (Q: How can you tell a party is in the majority? A: They're complaining about the fillibuster.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies ]

To: azishot

and my friend we need to come back to United Sane


179 posted on 03/12/2010 12:05:34 PM PST by JustPiper (Obamacare ONGOING THREAD ~http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2437390/posts?page=855#855~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson