Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

School Prom Canceled after ACLU Insists on Cross Dressing and Gay Dates
CE ^ | March 12, 2010 | John-Henry Westen

Posted on 03/12/2010 5:05:12 AM PST by NYer

A small town Mississippi High School has decided to cancel its school prom after the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) demanded the school permit a female student to wear a tux to the prom and attend with her lesbian partner.

Now the ACLU is suing the school, asking the courts to force the Itawamba County School District to hold the prom and permit 18-year-old Constance McMillen to attend with her lesbian partner and to cross-dress. (Read the lawsuit here)

Bryan Fischer, Director of Issues Analysis for the American Family Association, told LifeSiteNews (LSN) that he was taken aback by the “hypocrisy” of the ACLU. Fischer said, “ACLU is always telling us how wrong it is to impose our values on others, but here its clear that they are perfectly willing to ram their values down the throats of an entire school district and all of its students.”

“Now they are even trying to get a federal judge to dictate to the school whether they hold a prom or not,” he added.

Besides offending the moral sensibilities of many of the families in the Bible-belt with children attending the school, there are concerns that the wearing of a tuxedo by a girl would contravene the school’s strict dress code, which states, “Clothing and general appearance are not to be the type that would cause a disturbance.” The school’s dress code is admittedly “conservative,” also forbidding skirts above the knee, muscle shirts and exposure of undergarments.

Fischer said that while the ACLU asserts that McMillen is being treated unfairly, she is in fact being given the same right as all other students – to bring an opposite sex date to the prom. A February 5 memo from the school to students noted that each student may invite one guest to the prom and that the guest “must be of the opposite sex.”

What the ACLU fuss over the case suggests, said Fischer, “is that homosexual activists do not want equal rights but special rights.”

Itawamba County School District issued a statement yesterday saying that “due to the distractions to the educational process caused by recent events” it has decided not to host a prom at the High School this year. “It is our hope that private citizens will organize an event for the juniors and seniors,” the statement added.

The ACLU has previously forced schools to acquiesce to its demands. In November 2009, Tharptown High School in Alabama permitted Cynthia Stewart, 17, to attend the prom with another girl as her ‘date’. The school originally decided to cancel the prom rather than offend moral sensibilities, but capitulated when threatened with legal action by the ACLU.

The precedent on such cases was set in Canada in 2002. 17-year-old Marc Hall insisted that he be allowed to bring his 21-year-old boyfriend to the prom at his Catholic school. When the school refused to permit it, and canceled the prom rather than offend the school’s religious creed, homosexual activists made Hall into a cause célèbre, suing the school for $100,000.

The Ontario English Catholic Teachers Union (OECTA) actively sided with Hall against Catholic education and Church authorities and intervened in the case. Over half the teachers in Monsignor John Pereyma Catholic Secondary School supported Hall’s action.

In an interim ruling on the day of the prom, Ontario Superior Court Justice Robert MacKinnon issued an injunction saying that Hall could not be forbidden from attending with his homosexual date and that the school was not permitted to cancel the prom. The prom took place as the court ordered without significant protest from Catholic authorities.

In 2005, Hall dropped his lawsuit and the Catholic school board involved was never able to have a court decide finally on the matter.

The ACLU seems to be following the same method employed by homosexual activists in Canada. The ACLU says it will ask the court in the next few days to grant McMillen a preliminary injunction ordering the school to reinstate the April 2 prom, let McMillen and her girlfriend go to the prom together, and let McMillen wear a tuxedo to the event.

The case, Constance McMillen v. Itawamba County School District, et al., also named as defendants Superintendent Teresa McNeece and Itawamba Agricultural High School Principal Trae Wiygul and Vice Principal Rick Mitchell.

No spokesman from the school district was available for comment on this story.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; US: Mississippi
KEYWORDS: aclu; crossdressing; education; highschoolprom; homosexualagenda; itawambacounty; lesbians; prom; ruling; schools
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-55 next last

1 posted on 03/12/2010 5:05:12 AM PST by NYer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: netmilsmom; thefrankbaum; markomalley; Tax-chick; GregB; saradippity; Berlin_Freeper; Litany; ...
“Now they are even trying to get a federal judge to dictate to the school whether they hold a prom or not,” he added.

Catholic Ping
Please freepmail me if you want on/off this list


2 posted on 03/12/2010 5:06:06 AM PST by NYer ("Where Peter is, there is the Church." - St. Ambrose of Milan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

Should be entitled: Girl looking for 15 minutes and a lot of money.....


3 posted on 03/12/2010 5:07:40 AM PST by Sacajaweau (What)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer
The precedent on such cases was set in Canada in 2002.

Did they invoke Scottish Law?

Why does our legal system keep looking at foreign nations for guidance?

4 posted on 03/12/2010 5:09:42 AM PST by ClearCase_guy (We're all heading toward red revolution - we just disagree on which type of Red we want.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

This could be non-productive. If all the other students fail to attend the prom, the only two there will be the lesbians. Hardly a setting for a festive occasion.

The ACLU should be abolished.


5 posted on 03/12/2010 5:12:11 AM PST by chainsaw ( 'You know that your landing gear is up and locked when it takes full power to taxi to the terminal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer
The ACLU goes to court in an attempt to change the law of unintended consequences.
6 posted on 03/12/2010 5:13:01 AM PST by The Brush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer
she is in fact being given the same right as all other students – to bring an opposite sex date to the prom

Ooohh, they hate when you use that logical argument.

7 posted on 03/12/2010 5:15:10 AM PST by doodad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

Why does our legal system keep looking at foreign nations for guidance?

I would like to think that some of the justices on our SC can’t read the constitution, it’s too deep for them.


8 posted on 03/12/2010 5:15:17 AM PST by chainsaw ( 'You know that your landing gear is up and locked when it takes full power to taxi to the terminal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: NYer
What I have to say about the ACLU, the _resident and this despicable agenda (along with a plethora of other leftist agendas) will not pass the light of day with the Administrator....suffice it say that the harshest terms possible are in play for my response....
9 posted on 03/12/2010 5:16:19 AM PST by Vaquero (BHO....'The Pretenda from Kenya')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NYer

ACLU = Communists/enemies of all things American


10 posted on 03/12/2010 5:20:08 AM PST by Ghost of Philip Marlowe (Prepare for survival.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chainsaw

Agreed. Boycott the prom and have a private party elsewhere.


11 posted on 03/12/2010 5:20:11 AM PST by LeftiesBinWhinin (Term limits now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: NYer

I see no good-faith argument that a high school MUST hold a prom. It’s a voluntary extra-curricular activity that will usually occur but is not a mandatory event. ACLU is blowing smoke.

The school should however have just held the dance, refrained from comment, and let her wear her tuxedo. Last night I watched the movie “Flashdance”. Jennifer Beales looked quite fetching wearing her tux to dinner with her boyfriend. Several generations ago so did Marlena Dietrich. It’s a better look then much of the slutty fashions the school would have permitted.

Girls dancing with girls isn’t unusual, and not even a fraction as disruptive as this incident has snowballed into. The noon-time sockhops my junior high held were normally girls dancing together. It was no big deal. The school has handled this as ham-handedly as they possibly could have.


12 posted on 03/12/2010 5:20:16 AM PST by tlb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer

To hell with gubmint schools holding proms and parents and students having to deal with gubmint courts and ACLU gadflys.

Just make the entire thing a private affair. Start a private parent/student prom-planning group, sell tickets, rent out a hall, hire a caterer, hire a band, put up decorations, etc.

At most proms, student and parent volunteers do most of the work anyway. It’s no harder than planning a big wedding, and once you set the template, you just do the same planning routine every year — big deal! Who needs the gubmint involved?


13 posted on 03/12/2010 5:22:52 AM PST by duckworth (Perhaps instant karma's going to get you. Perhaps not.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: chainsaw
This could be non-productive. If all the other students fail to attend the prom, the only two there will be the lesbians. Hardly a setting for a festive occasion.

I think I saw a movie like that once...

14 posted on 03/12/2010 5:24:47 AM PST by Haiku Guy (If you have a right / To the service I provide / I must be your slave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: tlb

I agree. Wearing a tux is not a big deal. Everyone probably knew she was gay( I doubt she was discreet).
I think she tried to make a mountain outta nothing for the attention.
BTW my straight daughter went to her prom with girls as she did not have a date but wanted to go anyways.
If her school had sent out a letter saying you must attend with a member of the opposite sex, I would have had something to say about it.


15 posted on 03/12/2010 5:27:21 AM PST by ronniesgal ( I miss George Bush. Hell, I miss Bill Clinton!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: NYer
This is exactly how the south lost most of it cafe’s inside of grocery stores, the government said they had to be integrated... so the store owners said “forget that! I will close them first!” and they did.
16 posted on 03/12/2010 5:28:00 AM PST by TexasFreeper2009 (Obama = Epic Fail)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NYer
Now the ACLU is suing the school, asking the courts to force the Itawamba County School District to hold the prom and permit 18-year-old Constance McMillen to attend with her lesbian partner

Only if the parents of the homosexuals agree to pay all the property taxes and expenses of the school district from now on. Otherwise, the parents of the other students, and the board they elected, are in charge.

Should the school allow kids to bring, lets say, sex animals to the prom, too? What if a student is doing his dog?
How about blow up dolls or vibrators? Whips and chains? Why stop at one kink? Why not bring it all in and keep it fair?

Where do normal people draw the line? Why corrupt our entire culture because of a few dysfunctional freaks?

17 posted on 03/12/2010 5:29:51 AM PST by concerned about politics ("Get thee behind me, Liberal")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasFreeper2009

You will soon see public high schools no longer sponsoring the high school prom. It will be jobbed out.


18 posted on 03/12/2010 5:30:36 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks (Impeachment !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: NYer

I don’t think this is about the gay agenda, I think it is about allowing the courts to dictate what happens at a school.


19 posted on 03/12/2010 5:31:39 AM PST by HIDEK6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy
Why does our legal system keep looking at foreign nations for guidance?

For the same reason we have the Kelo SCOTUS decision. Because we continue to sit back and allow the trampling of our Constitution to happen......

20 posted on 03/12/2010 5:33:40 AM PST by Thermalseeker (Stop the insanity - Flush Congress!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-55 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson