Posted on 03/12/2010 5:05:12 AM PST by NYer
Catholic Ping
Please freepmail me if you want on/off this list
Should be entitled: Girl looking for 15 minutes and a lot of money.....
Did they invoke Scottish Law?
Why does our legal system keep looking at foreign nations for guidance?
This could be non-productive. If all the other students fail to attend the prom, the only two there will be the lesbians. Hardly a setting for a festive occasion.
The ACLU should be abolished.
Ooohh, they hate when you use that logical argument.
Why does our legal system keep looking at foreign nations for guidance?
I would like to think that some of the justices on our SC can’t read the constitution, it’s too deep for them.
ACLU = Communists/enemies of all things American
Agreed. Boycott the prom and have a private party elsewhere.
I see no good-faith argument that a high school MUST hold a prom. It’s a voluntary extra-curricular activity that will usually occur but is not a mandatory event. ACLU is blowing smoke.
The school should however have just held the dance, refrained from comment, and let her wear her tuxedo. Last night I watched the movie “Flashdance”. Jennifer Beales looked quite fetching wearing her tux to dinner with her boyfriend. Several generations ago so did Marlena Dietrich. It’s a better look then much of the slutty fashions the school would have permitted.
Girls dancing with girls isn’t unusual, and not even a fraction as disruptive as this incident has snowballed into. The noon-time sockhops my junior high held were normally girls dancing together. It was no big deal. The school has handled this as ham-handedly as they possibly could have.
To hell with gubmint schools holding proms and parents and students having to deal with gubmint courts and ACLU gadflys.
Just make the entire thing a private affair. Start a private parent/student prom-planning group, sell tickets, rent out a hall, hire a caterer, hire a band, put up decorations, etc.
At most proms, student and parent volunteers do most of the work anyway. It’s no harder than planning a big wedding, and once you set the template, you just do the same planning routine every year — big deal! Who needs the gubmint involved?
I think I saw a movie like that once...
I agree. Wearing a tux is not a big deal. Everyone probably knew she was gay( I doubt she was discreet).
I think she tried to make a mountain outta nothing for the attention.
BTW my straight daughter went to her prom with girls as she did not have a date but wanted to go anyways.
If her school had sent out a letter saying you must attend with a member of the opposite sex, I would have had something to say about it.
Only if the parents of the homosexuals agree to pay all the property taxes and expenses of the school district from now on. Otherwise, the parents of the other students, and the board they elected, are in charge.
Should the school allow kids to bring, lets say, sex animals to the prom, too? What if a student is doing his dog?
How about blow up dolls or vibrators? Whips and chains? Why stop at one kink? Why not bring it all in and keep it fair?
Where do normal people draw the line? Why corrupt our entire culture because of a few dysfunctional freaks?
You will soon see public high schools no longer sponsoring the high school prom. It will be jobbed out.
I don’t think this is about the gay agenda, I think it is about allowing the courts to dictate what happens at a school.
For the same reason we have the Kelo SCOTUS decision. Because we continue to sit back and allow the trampling of our Constitution to happen......
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.