Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

‘They Just Want This Over’ (interview with Stupak)
National Review (The Corner) ^ | March 12, 2010 | Robert Costa

Posted on 03/12/2010 1:12:07 PM PST by reaganaut1

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last
To: reaganaut1

We should carry 50 million pennies to washington and drop them off... “Over 50 million...” How sad!
http://www.mbcb.org/missing.aspx#filled


21 posted on 03/12/2010 1:38:16 PM PST by An American! (Proud To Be An American!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wolf24

Ol’ Scratch rules the Dem Party.


22 posted on 03/12/2010 1:38:35 PM PST by reagandemocrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

I agree. NEVER trust a dem.


23 posted on 03/12/2010 1:38:56 PM PST by afnamvet (Patriots Rising)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

Exactly!! Thank you!!


24 posted on 03/12/2010 1:40:29 PM PST by gibsosa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

“Should he be saved from defeat in November for his principled stand?

Hell no, because you’re already letting the enemy win the long-term war.”

You are 100% right. That which supports Obozo/Pelosi/Reid must be sterilized and there are no exceptions!


25 posted on 03/12/2010 1:40:48 PM PST by DarthVader (Liberalism is the politics of EVIL whose time of judgment has come.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

The focus of who is better off dead needs to be shifted.

Does the aged granma Pelosi have a greater right to live than an unborn child?


26 posted on 03/12/2010 1:41:40 PM PST by bert (K.E. N.P. +12 . Tax the poor. Taxes will give them a stake in society)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

There aren’t many politicians who should be saved in November. Republican weakness the past 6 years brought to where we are today, and the Democrats are raising hell.


27 posted on 03/12/2010 1:41:41 PM PST by Windy City Conservative (Kyle Smith)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: maxter
Should he be saved from defeat in November for his principled stand?

Who got his vote for Speaker?

28 posted on 03/12/2010 1:48:40 PM PST by TonyInOhio ( Let our hearts be stout)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
“And the politics of the issue are pretty rough. “This has really reached an unhealthy stage,” Stupak says. “People are threatening ethics complaints on me.”

I guess if you don't prove your loyalty by directly facilitating the killing of the unborn, the Democrats attack you.

How many must die to satiate these people?

29 posted on 03/12/2010 1:54:21 PM PST by Gabrial
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maxter

Should we mock you for being so misinformed? No.

Stupak is from MI-1. the U.P. He has no opponent yet. He will win easy. And nobody is running against him in a primary. So he doesn’t need anyone to save him from defeat. Not that you could.


30 posted on 03/12/2010 1:54:57 PM PST by campaignPete R-CT ("pray without ceasing" - Paul of Tarsus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: TChris

If they can easily kill babies with no conscience (who for about 50 or 60 years would contribute to Social Security) do you think they will even blink at killing grandma or grandpa who are a drain on Medicare and Social Security? Grandma and grandpa aren’t nearly as cute as a baby either.

Why on earth would anyone want an entity making life and death decisions when they have the actuarial advantage to kill you?


31 posted on 03/12/2010 2:03:37 PM PST by Truth is a Weapon (Truth, it hurts soooo good!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
What are Democratic leaders saying? “If you pass the Stupak amendment, more children will be born, and therefore it will cost us millions more. That’s one of the arguments I’ve been hearing,” Stupak says. “Money is their hang-up. Is this how we now value life in America? If money is the issue — come on, we can find room in the budget. This is life we’re talking about.”

And the liberals and the media say that it's the conservatives who love money and value money over people.

I can't recall any conservatives saying let's kill people to save a buck.
32 posted on 03/12/2010 2:03:43 PM PST by Ticonderoga34 (Free Obama's Birth Certificate!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1; ExTexasRedhead

Rep. Stupak: Democratic Leadership Admitted They Want to Fund Abortion (VIDEO)

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2469847/posts

Call it what it is GENOCIDE of the Unborn, abortion is a benign word in the public’s mind, where as all know what GENOCIDE is.


33 posted on 03/12/2010 2:04:05 PM PST by GailA (obamacare paid for by cuts & taxes on most vulnerable Veterans, disabled,seniors & retired Military)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Dems to my grandchildren - “Drop dead!!!”


34 posted on 03/12/2010 2:04:57 PM PST by airborne ("Peace, Love, Dope" has now become "Hope, Change, Obama" !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wolf24
What are Democratic leaders saying? “If you pass the Stupak amendment, more children will be born, and therefore it will cost us millions more. That’s one of the arguments I’ve been hearing,” Stupak says. “Money is their hang-up. Is this how we now value life in America? If money is the issue — come on, we can find room in the budget. This is life we’re talking about.”

Stupak should open his eyes. It's not only a beginning of life issue. It's an end-of-life issue. They want to eliminate a lot of people at the other end of life's spectrum also. How many older Americans will perish because their quality of life doesn't meet the Democrats' standard to receive health care services they need?

35 posted on 03/12/2010 2:05:52 PM PST by Gee Wally
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: wolf24

Old people cost even more in upkeep than newborns, so all the Boomers headed for Social Security and Medicare can kiss their overpriced asses goodbye right now.

Collectivism is a death cult.

So I guess the ideal society for a liberal democrat would be one with no people in it.


36 posted on 03/12/2010 2:06:18 PM PST by Argus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Rename, repackage, rewrite it a tad smaller, and sell another pig in a poke. NO COLAs for granny, retired Military or retired fed employees. BIG NEW fees for Tricare for Life retired over 65 Military’s secondary health ins. (DOD bill already passed, delayed but goes into effect 2011 NEEDS TO BE REPEALED!

OBAMA’s WAR ON SENIORS http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2433867/posts/

New Dem mantra: Woof, woof eat dog food granny....ala let them eat cake.

Obama Puts Social Security on the Chopping Block (this is a commie rag)
http://motherjones.com/mojo/2010/01/obama-puts-social-security-chopping-block

Obama says slight fix will extend Social Security, http://townhall.com/news/us/2010/02/19/obama_says_slight_fix_will_extend_social_security

Health Care Rationing for Seniors Another Problem in New Obama Plan http://www.lifenews.com/bio3058.html

Medicare tax may apply to investment income (ObamaCare tax hike)
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2460988/posts

Obama: No reduced Medicare benefits in health care reform
http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/07/28/obama.health.care/index.html

Will healthcare reform mean cuts in Medicare for seniors?
http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/2009/1017/will-healthcare-reform-mean-cuts-in-medicare-for-seniors

Health Reform’s Hidden Victims Young people and seniors would pay a high price for ObamaCare.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203517304574306303720472842.html

Defaulted Loans May Haunt Seniors (Cuts SS CHECKS)
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2467213/posts

Obama to outline $313 billion in Medicare, Medicaid spending cuts
http://articles.latimes.com/2009/jun/14/nation/na-obama-radio14

A trip to the grocery store Tuesday saw cost of food skyrocketing again.
http://seniorjournal.com/NEWS/SocialSecurity/2009/20090629-SenCitMayNotGet.htm

Report: Bill would reduce senior care Medicare cuts approved by House may affect access to providers
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/11/14/AR2009111402597.html

Unions Cut Special Deal on Health Taxes (Healthcare cost for seniors going up to pay for unions)
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB20001424052748704281204575003040695279432.html

Mayo clinic
http://www.investors.com/NewsAndAnalysis/Article.aspx?id=517004

Weighing Medical Costs of End-of-Life Care (Money, Death Panels and The Duty to Die)
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/23/health/23ucla.html?_r=1&ref=business&pagewanted=all

Seniors’ coverage options dwindle as Medicare Advantage programs close shop
http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/bus/stories/DN-advantage_22bus.ART.State.Edition1.3c912a9.html

Screwing the Seniors? AARP to Make Millions Off of Obamacare
http://yidwithlid.blogspot.com/2009/10/screwing-seniors-aarp-to-make-millions.html
Health Care Rationing for Seniors Another Problem in New

Obama Plan
http://www.lifenews.com/bio3058.html

Balch calls that “genuine chutzpah” because the Obama plan makes that claim “even as it imposes what will be ever-increasing rationing on senior citizens.”
The Senate health care bill already contains provisions that threaten to ration lifesaving medical treatment for seniors.

NRLC says state commissioners of the new health insurance exchanges created by the bill would be given significant power. They could deny people who are trying to obtain policies in the exchange the option of choosing health plans less likely to deny treatment, by limiting what they would be allowed to pay for such policies.
Related web sites:

National Right to Life Committee - http://www.nrlc.org

Obama: No reduced Medicare benefits in health care reform
http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/07/28/obama.health.care/index.html

Will healthcare reform mean cuts in Medicare for seniors?
http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/2009/1017/will-healthcare-reform-mean-cuts-in-medicare-for-seniors

Health Reform’s Hidden Victims Young people and seniors would pay a high price for ObamaCare.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970203517304574306303720472842.html

Repeal Obamacare? Unlikely
http://townhall.com/columnists/DavidHarsanyi/2010/03/10/repeal_obamacare_unlikely
Obama spent last week campaigning for health care reform, at one point getting some college-age fans worked up about all the free stuff — “free” preventive care and “free” checkups and so forth — they would receive if his version of health care reform passed.

Slashing Medicare to pay for healthcare reform an ugly shell game

Dr. Stuart M. Shapiro,
July 27, 2009

http://www.mcknights.com/slashing-medicare-to-pay-for-healthcare-reform-an-ugly-shell-game/article/140656/
If the cost is by cutting Medicaid and Medicare, then taxpayers are in for a rude awakening when millions will retire without money to pay for their healthcare. Ransoming seniors’ long-term care for immediate, large-scale health reform is more politically beneficial for its supporters in the short-term than it is reasonable for everyone in the long run.

In fact, even in the short-term, one could argue that taxpayers, including the elderly, are looking at an old-fashioned shell game from Washington. No sooner was the ink dry on the federal stimulus package, which provided millions of dollars to support care for the elderly in Pennsylvania, before Congress and the administration began to propose major cuts in Medicare to finance healthcare reform. Because Medicare payments support quality care in our nation’s nursing homes, the proposed cuts nationally approaching $50 billion in Medicare payments for the care of the elderly is guaranteed to undercut the quality gains of the past decade. In Pennsylvania, if the proposals currently on the table are enacted, these policies would result in an almost 10% reduction in cumulative payments over 10 years, or more than $2.1 billion.

None of the answers on healthcare, Social Security, Medicaid or Medicare is easy. But there is one thing we do know: Our population is growing older, and doing so rapidly. Cutting money from the programs that finance care for Pennsylvania seniors is seriously flawed. There is no simple or single solution. But there is a wrong way, and taking money from the care for American seniors is deeply flawed.

Stuart H. Shapiro, M.D., is the president and CEO of the Pennsylvania Health Care Association


37 posted on 03/12/2010 2:07:59 PM PST by GailA (obamacare paid for by cuts & taxes on most vulnerable Veterans, disabled,seniors & retired Military)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Argus

those baby boomers are going to get a very ugly history lesson repeat about what happened in WW II.

(carosel will be prettier, with even an obama logo)


38 posted on 03/12/2010 2:08:03 PM PST by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Not enough Democratic congressmen know history....as in The French Revolution...Marie Antoinette..”let them eat cake”...type of history.

Its best for all they be reminded of it BEFORE they vote......


39 posted on 03/12/2010 2:08:23 PM PST by mo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

Pushing Veterans Toward the Grave

http://www.christianpost.com/blogs/opinion/2009/08/pushing-veterans-toward-the-grave-31/


40 posted on 03/12/2010 2:10:30 PM PST by GailA (obamacare paid for by cuts & taxes on most vulnerable Veterans, disabled,seniors & retired Military)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson