Dems: More children will be born, and therefore it will cost us millions more

http://corner.nationalreview.com/post/?q=MzU0MDYxMWEyOTdiNGU1OGU3ZjYzYmE3Y2ZlZDQ5NTY= ^

[HD1200]

What are Democratic leaders saying? “If you pass the Stupak amendment, more children will be born, and therefore it will cost us millions more. That’s one of the arguments I’ve been hearing,” Stupak says. “Money is their hang-up. Is this how we now value life in America? If money is the issue — come on, we can find room in the budget. This is life we’re talking about.” If Obamacare passes, Stupak says, it could signal the end of any meaningful role for pro-life Democrats within their own party. “It would be very, very hard for someone who is a right-to-life Democrat to run for office,” he says.

[shibumi]

"Dems: More children will be born, and therefore it will cost us millions more"

Won't cost a penny, if you don't pass it in the first place.

[GSP.FAN]

The most celebrated nonfiction book of the year is Freakonomics: A Rogue Economist Explores the Hidden Side of Everything by U. of Chicago superstar economist Steven D. Levitt and journalist Stephen J. Dubner. The most admired aspect of the book has been Levitt's theory that legalizing abortion cut the crime rate, which became Instant Conventional Wisdom. Now, it turns out, according to two economists at the Boston Fed who have checked Levitt's calculations in detail, that the abortion-cut-crime theory rested upon two mistakes Levitt made. So far, Levitt admits to making one error, saying it "is personally quite embarrassing." Hi i am Margaret Sanger and i approve this message..

[stephenjohnbanker]

I have read at least half a dozen articles on this over the past few years, and one I do remember was from the Los Angeles Times....they are very pro amnesty, by the way. Maybe auntB can provide a quick reference.

[aruanan]

Hi i am Margaret Sanger and i approve this message..

Dang. It looks like she was in dire need of abortion as a means of sublimation. Actually, she looks like she was one of those twins each of which has half of the other twin's body. She has the eyes of a killer.

[GSP.FAN]

Well think about how many children she is responsible for killing..
All in the name of choice..
Eugenics anyone?

[redgolum]

The “health care” debate is about lowering costs. The dead cost nothing.

If it passes, there will be massive cuts, and it will end with the killing of those viewed as unfit.

[redgolum]

But before that child grows up to be a taxpayer, it will cost the parents a lot of money.

Many “ethicists” now a days say the cost of raising children puts to much of a burden on parents. So it is better to not have them.

In the end, it is the hatred of the human race. Pro infanticide people hate their fellow man.

Makes you think of the real force behind it.

[rbosque]

:0)

[Alamo-Girl]

Thanks for the ping!

[dalereed]

“But babies become taxpayers.”

They become welfare recipients also.

Let them get obese and they will die quicker!

[A.A. Cunningham]

National Review

[exit82]

Obamacare is not about health.

It is about control.

Control of you, your family and your posterity.

This country came into being for less than this.

It is time to take a stand.

Democrats are the enemy of freedom.

And now, of life.

[fortheDeclaration]

check out Hugh Hewitt website. He has a email system to send letters to Blue Dogs.
http://hughhewitt.com

He also has a link to the Tim Burns, the Republican trying to take Murtha’s old seat.

Send him a contribution to send a message to the Democrats.

[Semper Mark]

"Dems: More children will be born, and therefore it will cost us millions more"

"Won't cost a penny, if you don't pass it in the first place."

There you go again shibumi, interjecting common sense into an argument devoid of any sense at all.

~

These people (the Dems) are the Third Reich kind of evil, and that's all there is to it.

[sheik yerbouty]

These people are monsters..

[Pinkbell]

Aw, they are going after them on both ends of the spectrum I see. My mom said pro-lifers predicted this when Roe vs. Wade was legalized, and pro-aborts of course shrugged that off. They said that abortion on demand certainly wouldn’t lead to euthanasia, but now it’s coming. They have to save money any way possible.

The problem is, libs don’t think their plans through. If you want to have all of these socialized programs, you are going to need workers to be taxed to pay into them. If you kill off future workers, that’s less to fund your programs.

[E.G.C.]

BTTT

[Mrs. Don-o]

That’s probably on their agenda, inspired by their Patron Saint (Blessed of the Lowerarchy Realm) Margaret Sanger..

[Mrs. Don-o]

The only way to keep this firmly rooted in human dignity and personal responsibility is to socially delegitimize selfish out of wedlock sex (for all races and classes, including the sport-f***ing celebrities); and valorize faithful marriage as the only humanly decent context for procreating human life — which is, let’s not forget, sacred.

[Mrs. Don-o]

Amen to that, sister.