Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dirtboy

I would agree that pot fears were oversold with “Reefer Madness” and the like, but even without that, pot probably wouldn’t have survived for more than another couple decades or so given the advent of other things catching gummit attention (like LSD). I would be willing to cut the Gordian knot by putting the matter under the supervision of physicians; any formerly banned (or simply FDA unapproved) drug may be administered IF the physician takes reasonable responsibility for the results. This is assuming we are spared Bummercare.


24 posted on 03/18/2010 3:54:08 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (I am in America but not of America (per bible: am in the world but not of it))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: HiTech RedNeck
That still puts fedgov in charge of setting the rules, if I understand your position correctly. Why not just follow the original understanding of the Commerce Clause and Tenth Amendment, and let each state decide its own drug policy?
26 posted on 03/18/2010 7:49:18 PM PDT by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson