Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Author: Tim Murphy was Secretary of Health and Human Services for Massachusetts under former Governor Mitt Romney. More than 430,000 additional people now enjoy the security of health insurance, approximately half without any government assistance.

I read almost the same exact sentence from another Romneybot on NRO Corner. Obvously, Willard was hitting the fax machines this week

Each of these maladies can be cured, if state officials recognize the limitations of top-down government solutions

Talking point 2: Blame Duval for the current metldown in Mass. This is like Lenin apologists claiming Lenin was not responsible for Stalin's butchery. Lenin set up the framework that allowed Stalin to do his work. Romney set up the framework and gave the government the power to implement top-down solutions.

1 posted on 03/18/2010 9:02:56 AM PDT by C19fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: C19fan

Works as well as TENNCARE.

Check it out.


2 posted on 03/18/2010 9:05:40 AM PDT by Carley (Are you better off now than one year ago? HELL NO!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2472913/posts

The result is all the problems familiar to patients in socialized systems — longer wait times, fewer doctors, overstretched emergency rooms — with the uniquely American wrinkle of dramatically increased costs. Mass. residents now pay 27 percent more than the U.S. average.

If costs are the issue, it isn’t very difficult: As has been noted here many times, third-party transactions are always more expensive, whether the third party is an insurer or the government. Most people in the waiting room don’t care whether the procedure costs $200 or $20,000: Their only concern is whether the third party will grant access to it. If you mandate universal third-partyism, your costs by definition will increase. As a businessman, Mitt should have known that. So it reflects poorly on his judgment.

And it’s worse than that, because, of those citizens forced by Mitt to acquire insurance, nearly 70 percent are getting it all but totally subsidized by Massachusetts taxpayers. That’s a good example of another general principle — that, even if you accept his characterization of the plan, wonkish non-partisan technocratic reforms will invariably be turned leftward by the statist bureaucracy.


3 posted on 03/18/2010 9:07:42 AM PDT by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan

“Mass. residents now pay 27 percent more than the U.S. average.”

Change you can believe in................


5 posted on 03/18/2010 9:09:09 AM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (Support our troops, and vote out the RINOS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan

Where is RINO Romney
as the Dems push through ObamaCARE?

Answer: The RINO coward is hiding, sending out his saboteurs
against Gov. Palin and all conservative GOP stars again,
selling his ghostwritten book, helping Obama by having Murphy push RomneyCARE
and by attacking the “tea party”.
6 posted on 03/18/2010 9:12:01 AM PDT by Diogenesis ("Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God." --Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan
“As an experiment, however, the Massachusetts law has revealed certain weaknesses in the plan. Three areas of concern are: overreaching social planning by the Commonwealth Health Insurance Connector Authority (the “exchange”); double-digit increases in health insurance costs for many employers and individuals, and too much taxpayer money still underwriting free care.”

Or, to put it much more honestly:”it is “bankrupting” the state.”
Which is the very fact that he starts out decrying as “implausible”.
Liberals, no matter how painfully obvious the evidence of their programs failure, always double down on stupid.

“Yes, it's not working, but only because we didn't go far enough.”

8 posted on 03/18/2010 9:14:33 AM PDT by bitterohiogunclinger (America held hostage - day 393)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan

The Massachusetts Treasurer was on Fox this morning and he said Romneycare was bankrupting the state.


10 posted on 03/18/2010 9:20:46 AM PDT by The Sons of Liberty ( I Will Not Comply! - FUBO! Mene, Mene, Tekel, Upharsin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan
Mittcare is for Rombutts Rombots. Don't trash the rest of us with a bad idea.
11 posted on 03/18/2010 9:23:06 AM PDT by pallis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: C19fan
All I know about RomneyCare is that if I go to e-healthinsurance.com and punch in my Texas zip code and my birth date (I'm 46), I get offered over 100 plans ranging in price from $67 to $580 per month.

If I punch in a Massachusetts Zip (02120) and my birth date, I get offered 6 plans raging from $412 to $558 per month.

Fewer choices. Higher prices. Need I say more?

12 posted on 03/18/2010 9:28:26 AM PDT by Stegall Tx (Joining the Obama economy on 19 March, 2010.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson