Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sec.Service Warns Public That They'd Confiscate Any Cameras Used to Take Pictures of First Family
JonathonTurley.org ^ | 03/22/10 | Jonathon Turley

Posted on 03/22/2010 1:14:50 PM PDT by OldDeckHand

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-168 next last
To: OldDeckHand

Maybe the girls have gotten fatter?


41 posted on 03/22/2010 1:25:56 PM PDT by roses of sharon (I can do all things through Him who strengthens me. Philippians 4:13)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand
Since she's the new fat czar she can't have her fat ass photographed and plastered on the net now can she?

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

42 posted on 03/22/2010 1:25:57 PM PDT by CajunConservative (Shut Up Mary!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand

What about the video camera embedded in the frame of my glasses?


43 posted on 03/22/2010 1:26:04 PM PDT by RobRoy (The US today: Revelation 18:4)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand

It’s OK! We don’t need or want to see any more pics of “Bubble Butt”, anyways. Use already broken cameras...hundreds of people, hundreds of image capture devices.....they would never get all the functional units.


44 posted on 03/22/2010 1:26:41 PM PDT by Birdsbane ("Onward through the fog!" ... Oat Willie)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand

Michelle Obama has placed her children squarely in the middle of public policy through her efforts to reduce childhood obesity. She has used her own children as part of that effort. Therefore, the appearance of those children is of legitimate public interest.

I wish it were not so. I wish that Michelle Obama had respected the boundries and not placed her children in this position. Unfortunately, that is not the case.

She has sown the wind...


45 posted on 03/22/2010 1:26:51 PM PDT by Haiku Guy (If you have a right / To the service I provide / I must be your slave.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand

Jonathan, they are just following orders from Her High Beltness - as I recall, zero has a bunch of security guards working with the USSS to provide his security. How do we know the ones threatening to take the cameras away were official USSS agents? They sure don’t mind pimping their daughters out for photo ops for political reasons.


46 posted on 03/22/2010 1:27:22 PM PDT by Citizen Soldier ("You care far too much what is written and said about you." Axelrod to Obama 2006)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand

Raise your hands if you think Obama is an American. Looks like the birthers aren’t so crazy after all. If it looks like a commie and walks like a commie, it’s a commie.


47 posted on 03/22/2010 1:27:31 PM PDT by Sir Gawain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand

Well, there is no wide angle lens in existence that would capture the first “ladies” ample buttocks from a distance of less than one mile, anyway...


48 posted on 03/22/2010 1:29:07 PM PDT by dashing doofus (Those who are too smart to engage in politics are punished by being governed by those who are dumber)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Hound Passer; MozarkDawg
"You have to give Turley props for putting this out there among his liberal fans."

I read about 30 legal blogs each day. Turley's is one of them. He is a liberal, but he's not a reflexive liberal who will defend anything they libs do, unlike most. He did take a reasonably principled stand during impeachment, and he spoke out against the use of the "slaughter rule" more recently.

49 posted on 03/22/2010 1:29:08 PM PDT by OldDeckHand (USA - b. July 4, 1776 / d. March 21, 2010)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: SWAMPSNIPER
The secret service is subject to the Bill of Rights too!

Really? Try and sue them. LOL

50 posted on 03/22/2010 1:30:14 PM PDT by Nachum (The complete Obama list at www.nachumlist.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: steveo

Every time, steveo ... every time.


51 posted on 03/22/2010 1:30:17 PM PDT by knarf (I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but they're true)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: The Sons of Liberty
"Under what authority do they seize personal property?"

Like in too many other areas, they have more and bigger guns along with the ability spend you into oblivion even if you are legally correct.

52 posted on 03/22/2010 1:30:47 PM PDT by Truth29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: The Sons of Liberty

Ain’t you heard? “There ain’t no rules here, we’re trying to accomplish something. . . .All this talk about rules. . . .When the deal goes down . . . we make ‘em up as we go along.”


53 posted on 03/22/2010 1:31:10 PM PDT by LibWhacker (America awake!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand

Are they afraid their images won’t show up on film?


54 posted on 03/22/2010 1:31:22 PM PDT by Just Lori (I used to be a democrat. Now, I'm an American.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand

Right - but it was Ok during the Bush administration to take as many pictures as possible esp. Bush in an embarrassing situation. I’m also wondering where are all these stand-up comics trashing Obama the way they did Bush and Cheney ...


55 posted on 03/22/2010 1:32:05 PM PDT by SkyDancer (If you don't read the newspaper you are uninformed, if you do read the newspaper you are misinformed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dinah Lord

They used ti say that about Hillary. Staffers would jump into the first open door to avoid her.


56 posted on 03/22/2010 1:32:48 PM PDT by massgopguy (I owe everything to George Bailey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand

I don’t know about others, but the LAST thing I want would be any pictures of the imposter or his family.


57 posted on 03/22/2010 1:32:55 PM PDT by ilovesarah2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Just Lori

See my #25


58 posted on 03/22/2010 1:33:30 PM PDT by knarf (I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but they're true)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: OldDeckHand

The problem with First Families attending Broadway shows is that even if they pay for their own tickets and dinners, we’re paying thousands upon thousands of dollars for transportation. Now they don’t even want American citizens to photograph them in public. How are taxpayers supposed to get some of their money back if they can’t sell a First-Family-on-parade photo?


59 posted on 03/22/2010 1:33:58 PM PDT by skr (May God confound the enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CarolinaGOP

To sell to Obama fans


60 posted on 03/22/2010 1:34:41 PM PDT by skr (May God confound the enemy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-168 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson