Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why this time is different [We can repeal this ill bill.]
RedState.com ^ | 3/22/2010 | Neil Stevens

Posted on 03/22/2010 6:32:13 PM PDT by SeattleBruce

Posted by Neil Stevens (Profile)

Monday, March 22nd at 11:00AM EDT

90 Comments The Eeyores of the conservative movement are all over this Obamacare vote, declaring that we’re doomed to perpetual socialism because Republicans never repeal anything. To them I say: bah. We’ve never been in this situation before, where we’ll actually win an election on the heels of passage.

Social Security: Passed in 1935. Republicans take House and Senate in 1947, 12 years later.

Medicare and Medicaid: Passed in 1965. Republicans take Senate in 1981, 16 years later.

Obamacare: Passed in 2010. Republicans take House in 2011, one year (9 months, actually) later?

There’s just no comparison. We can fight back before much of it even takes effect, not over a decade later when the benefits are entrenched. No excuses. No pessimism. Fight and win, politically.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Editorial; Front Page News; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 111th; bhohealthcare; election; obamacare; repeal
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 next last
The making of the SOCIALIST SMACKDOWN!
1 posted on 03/22/2010 6:32:13 PM PDT by SeattleBruce
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeattleBruce

Well now that I have seen the scenario framed this way, perhaps nine months may not be impossible to turn around, granted that we win bigtime in house and senate and I mean BIGTIME!


2 posted on 03/22/2010 6:35:44 PM PDT by classified
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeattleBruce

Where’s some political analysts’ takes on how the races are standing come this next election?

I mean, it’s one thing to wish it to be true, but quite another for it to happen that we take over control of the Senate and House, and supposedly with enough votes to overcome a veto, too.... or are we presuming making a clean sweep of everything? :-)

I don’t know... because I do assume that we’re going to pick up seats, but I don’t see any kind of rational analysis saying that we’re going to be taking over the Senate and the House...


3 posted on 03/22/2010 6:40:42 PM PDT by Star Traveler (Remember to keep the Messiah of Israel in the One-World Government that we look forward to coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeattleBruce

So, we get to see the bill now. Right? Didn’t 0buttcrack promise us we could see the bill before he signed it?


4 posted on 03/22/2010 6:40:44 PM PDT by TigersEye (Down a lazy river ...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeattleBruce

Good point.


5 posted on 03/22/2010 6:41:37 PM PDT by stayathomemom (Beware of cat attacks while typing!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: classified

The only chance of turning this around before the next Presidential election will be if the Republicans win veto proof super-majorities in the House and in the Senate. That isn’t going to happen.

My biggest fear is a repeat of 1994 and 1996. The Republicans take over the House and Senate, the voters forget why they were disgusted with the Democrats, and two years later Obama gets re-elected.

In 1994, no one expected Clinton to get re-elected to a second term.


6 posted on 03/22/2010 6:43:49 PM PDT by Bubba_Leroy (The Obamanation Continues)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeattleBruce
It's going to take a presidential veto override to repeal this bill before 2013. The Republican Congress can and should send a repeal bill to Obama to make him veto it. And the rally cry of every GOP campaign in 2012 should be to stop the mandate in January of 2013. But we need to focus on other efforts as well including:
7 posted on 03/22/2010 6:44:46 PM PDT by DannyTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: classified
We take back Congress one seat at a time...in 2013 we can kill this..Passing this will make people madder..remember the taxes start first...they think we will forget....it is also about spending...and there is more coming...
8 posted on 03/22/2010 6:44:53 PM PDT by Hojczyk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeattleBruce; Two Thirds Vote Aye

2/3rds, I found this to be encouraging. We must take charge of the debate and be bold in confrontation. The question I’ve heard asked is whether the outrage can be maintained through November. It was maintained since last summer. So, as the heavy taxes kick in and more people are out of a job, the momentum and outrage can definitely be maintained.

Thanks, Seattle, for posting this.


9 posted on 03/22/2010 6:45:39 PM PDT by Jemian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: classified

For us to win big time, we have got to get voter fraud under control. Every election I hear people say how conservatives will have to win huge or ACORN will beat them. Why do we allow that?

I would love to work with any team or group that wants to find ways to combat this evil. Voter rolls need to be purged, absentee ballots need to be subjected to verification and we need to find those voting multiple times in different states, etc.

Then we need to start campaigns to call Congress and cut ACORN funding to their newly-named organization.

Please don’t tell me how hopeless it is because of the Secretary of State project. That’s how we’ve gotten in the trouble we’re in, by giving up before we start.


10 posted on 03/22/2010 6:48:31 PM PDT by Kenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeattleBruce

No need to repeal it. Make 0’b show a birth cert. This is so simple a 12 yr. old kid could handle it. Yet watch how the courts etc. handle it , hum hawning around, shuffling their feet, even the chief justice of the SCOTUS will not touch this. If 0’b is shown to be foreign born, then all of this is null and void. Just watch us get screwed over again.


11 posted on 03/22/2010 6:50:19 PM PDT by Waco (Kalifonia don't need no stenkin oil and no stenkin revenue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeattleBruce

The taxes, cuts to medical programs, and other “money raising” devices take place immediately. Then we need 2/3 of the House and 2/3 of the Senate. It is not even possible to take a 2/3 Senate in 2010. So now we are talking about 2012 as the soonest. It will be two years later and the most onerous portions are still not in effect.


12 posted on 03/22/2010 6:50:33 PM PDT by Ingtar (Congress: proof that Entropy trumps Evolution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeattleBruce
if prohibition can be repealed this can too.
13 posted on 03/22/2010 6:51:08 PM PDT by TexasFreeper2009 (Obama = Epic Fail)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kenny

It isn’t hopeless. Not at all. I said yesterday that we are going to have to work like hell to get our country back. Any complaceny we’ve had will have to take double or triple our efforts to make things right again...but the key factor is that we can do this. It is possible.


14 posted on 03/22/2010 6:51:22 PM PDT by atruelady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Kenny

We don’t need to just repeal it. We need to fix the system. Increase the supply dramatically on the provider side of the equation, and costs can and will come down. Increase competition among insurers. Introduce free market reforms throughout the entire medical system. Reform tort. Comprehensive, thorough reform. Not just repeal.


15 posted on 03/22/2010 6:52:10 PM PDT by Tennessean4Bush (An optimist believes we live in the best of all possible worlds. A pessimist fears this is true.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Bubba_Leroy

“My biggest fear is a repeat of 1994 and 1996. The Republicans take over the House and Senate, the voters forget why they were disgusted with the Democrats, and two years later Obama gets re-elected.”

Tea Parties didn’t even exist in the glimmer of someone’s eye in 1994 - 1996. Sure there was significant turnover, but Clinton headed to the middle - he didn’t shove health care down Americans throats just before 1994, or we would have had super majorities then. As bad as Clinton and wife were then, MAO-bama and crew are magnitudes worse. And American is finally WAKING up to that.

Oh, we won’t let people ‘forget’ in ‘tween now and 2012.


16 posted on 03/22/2010 6:53:02 PM PDT by SeattleBruce (God, Family, Church, Country - Keep on Tea Partiers - party like it's 1773 & pray 2 Chronicles 7:14!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: DannyTN

It’s going to take a presidential veto override to repeal this bill before 2013. The Republican Congress can and should send a repeal bill to Obama to make him veto it. And the rally cry of every GOP campaign in 2012 should be to stop the mandate in January of 2013. But we need to focus on other efforts as well including:

**Constitutional challenges
**Assertion of states rights
**Constitutional amendments (but not a constitutional convention which is way too dangerous).
**Religious objections to participation because abortion is funded.
++++++++++++++

Exactly - the demarcations for the larger battle to take apart the RATS is being drawn up, right before our eyes. Now we must execute on all fronts, as you suggest.


17 posted on 03/22/2010 6:55:06 PM PDT by SeattleBruce (God, Family, Church, Country - Keep on Tea Partiers - party like it's 1773 & pray 2 Chronicles 7:14!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; Berosus; bigheadfred; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Fred Nerks; ...
The Eeyores of the conservative movement are all over this Obamacare vote, declaring that we're doomed to perpetual socialism because Republicans never repeal anything. To them I say: bah. We've never been in this situation before, where we'll actually win an election on the heels of passage. Social Security: Passed in 1935. Republicans take House and Senate in 1947, 12 years later. Medicare and Medicaid: Passed in 1965. Republicans take Senate in 1981, 16 years later. Obamacare: Passed in 2010. Republicans take House in 2011, one year (9 months, actually) later?
I think Republicans took the Senate during the Nixon administration, not long after the Medicare act in 1965 -- and lost it again two years later. Thanks SeattleBruce.
18 posted on 03/22/2010 6:55:15 PM PDT by SunkenCiv ("Fools learn from experience. I prefer to learn from the experience of others." -- Otto von Bismarck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: classified

make a commitment to donate time,energy and money to conservative candidates and we will.


19 posted on 03/22/2010 6:55:29 PM PDT by nomad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeattleBruce
The reason Social Security and Medicare were never repealed by Republicans is not because the Republicans did not take control of congress soon afterward, but instead because these two pieces of legislation actually had bipartisan support.

A majority of Republican legislators voted for Social Security and the Medicare vote among Republican Legislators was evenly split.

Summary of Party Affiliation on Medicare Vote

Summary of Party Affiliation on Social Security Act Vote

20 posted on 03/22/2010 6:57:04 PM PDT by Between the Lines (AreYouWhoYouSayYouAre?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson