Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Other Tax Shoes Begin To Drop
Investors.com ^ | March 23, 2010 | INVESTORS BUSINESS DAILY staff

Posted on 03/23/2010 5:46:34 PM PDT by Kaslin

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last
To: Kaslin; All

BHO: “I can make a firm pledge, under my plan, no family making less than $250,000 a year will see any form of tax increase. Not your income tax, not your payroll tax, not your capital gains taxes, not any of your taxes.”

I need a smilie of a guy falling down laughing!


21 posted on 03/23/2010 6:33:06 PM PDT by ConjunctionJunction (LOLcat sez: "ObamaCare: Do Not Want!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ripley

Those independents overwhelmingly voted for the GOP candidates in Virginia, New Jersey and Massachusetts in the last few months.


22 posted on 03/23/2010 6:35:37 PM PDT by Alberta's Child ("Let the Eastern bastards freeze in the dark.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: ripley
Easy there, BreezyDo, easy does it. If you disagree, say so. (And if you want me to STFU, say so.) ARe you angry at the possibility of a Democrat win which would disappoint you sorely, or are you ready to rip my head off because you’re just angry at recent events or angry at my apparent stupidity in disregarding the sentiments of many citizens? Easy, big fella, easy.

Woof!

All of the above...Instead of STFU how about just perish the thought?

23 posted on 03/23/2010 6:39:40 PM PDT by BreezyDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

there are two more type of taxes the Socialist want. a tax on CO2 and a Added Value Tax.

The Added Value Tax, unlike a national sale tax to replace all other federal taxes and fees, will be an addition to all other federal taxes and fees.


24 posted on 03/23/2010 6:41:49 PM PDT by steveab (When was the last time someone tried to sell you a CO2 induced climate control system for your home?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ripley
All those really, really brilliant, smart, intelligent independents out there are going to intellectualize their hate for “the rich” and say how compassionate the latest progressive legislation is.

Look for Democrat/Progressive victories in 2010.

IMHO

That might be true, except this bill now labels those people as part of "the rich". Once they experience first hand the negative effects of this legislation, they will realize that they are also in the line of fire of their supposed "enlightened" comrades.

25 posted on 03/23/2010 6:42:07 PM PDT by TravisBickle (Are you talkin' to me?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

A 4% Medicare rent tax ?? really??


26 posted on 03/23/2010 6:43:49 PM PDT by GeronL (All politicians are POS. Some are just piled higher and smell worse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; Berosus; bigheadfred; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Fred Nerks; ...
...a reconciliation bill that contains even more onerous taxes and even a financial incentive to lay people off.

27 posted on 03/23/2010 6:54:39 PM PDT by SunkenCiv ("Fools learn from experience. I prefer to learn from the experience of others." -- Otto von Bismarck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child

Washington State is the same, with a (R) SOS, and a Dem Gov. who is good and pissed. And, like Pa, he’s a front-runner for Gov.


28 posted on 03/23/2010 7:21:21 PM PDT by gunner03
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
Here's where it gets even more bizarre. According to Heritage, under the reconciliation bill, if Company A lays off an employee with a working spouse, this could generate a $3,000 tax penalty for the other spouse's employer, unless Company B also lays off the other spouse.


29 posted on 03/23/2010 7:31:28 PM PDT by fightinJAG (Are you a Twitter activist? Freepmail me & let's talk.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tbw2

As best I can tell, it has something like Employer B gets a “discount” for insuring a person whose spouse is also insured. But if the spouse is not insured (i.e., because she loses her job with Employer A), then Employer B has to pay more to insure his employee.

Like if the employers are splitting the premium for the insurance provided to the family, then they’re not splitting it if one spouse is fired?


30 posted on 03/23/2010 7:35:06 PM PDT by fightinJAG (Are you a Twitter activist? Freepmail me & let's talk.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: steveab

“there are two more type of taxes the Socialist want. a tax on CO2 and a Added Value Tax.”

I agree.

But having them raise taxes instead of pass Cap and Trade, or Immigration Reform, would be vastly better. Taxes are easy to undo.


31 posted on 03/23/2010 7:41:13 PM PDT by webstersII
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: BreezyDog

“How about just perish the thought?”

My sentiments exactly. But, unfortunately, the psychotics now occupying the government are backed by the psychotics in the electorate; and the number of “brilliant, intellectual” psychotics is growing.

IMHO


32 posted on 03/23/2010 7:43:45 PM PDT by ripley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: griswold3

I know! I immediately double-checked to see the source. It’s IBD !!! Certainly credible. What an insane bill this is! Just insane!


33 posted on 03/23/2010 7:45:23 PM PDT by MrChips (MrChips)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ripley
I think when the psychotics see what this health care bill is going to do to them it will be like a direct shot of lithium to the frontal cortex. Therefore I disagree with your premise...

IMHO

34 posted on 03/23/2010 7:50:32 PM PDT by BreezyDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

35 posted on 03/23/2010 8:29:00 PM PDT by OrioleFan (Republicans believe every day is the 4th of July, democrats believe every day is April 15)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tbw2

“How can my company be responsible for a fine if my spouse’s employer has layoffs?”

There are “community organizers” who will be glad to “explain” that to you, comrade!/sarcasm;)


36 posted on 03/23/2010 8:52:25 PM PDT by Frank_2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
"...under the reconciliation bill, if Company A lays off an employee with a working spouse, this could generate a $3,000 tax penalty for the other spouse's employer, unless Company B also lays off the other spouse..."

Oh. My. G-d.

This sort of thing is just beyond the wildest fever-dreams.
37 posted on 03/23/2010 9:33:34 PM PDT by RightOnTheLeftCoast (Obama: running for re-election in '12 or running for Mahdi now? [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mahdi])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BreezyDog

They’re going to love every moment of it.


38 posted on 03/24/2010 1:47:16 AM PDT by ripley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson