Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Race to save Hollywood sign from bulldozer
March 25, 2010 | ABC News (Australia)

Posted on 03/25/2010 2:26:56 AM PDT by BigSkyFreeper

A conservation group warns they have just three weeks to raise $US3 million to save the iconic Hollywood sign from being razed by investors who want to build luxury houses on the site.

"We feel good about where we are and we feel good about our chances to do this," said Tim Ahern of the Trust for Public Land.

The group needs to raise $US3 million to reach the $US12.5 million needed to purchase the 138-acre parcel of rugged land surrounding the sign from a Chicago-based consortium that has acquired rights to build four luxury mansions along the ridgeline.

The investors sought to sell the property for $US22 million but agreed to the $US12.5-million price tag for the conservation group only if payment arrives by April 14.

Los Angeles council member Tom LaBonge says the trust has so far collected $US9.5 million - $US4 million from public funds, and the remainder $US5.5 million from private donors, including movie and television companies and Hollywood stars such as director Steven Spielberg and actor Tom Hanks.

"We're getting closer to our goal and if we continue working hard, I know we'll reach it," Mr LaBonge said.

One of the world's most recognisable landmarks, the sign was given a facelift last month when the trust shrouded each of the 13-metre high letters in blankets so the slogan "SAVE THE PEAK" became visible for miles around the sprawling Californian city.

The Hollywood sign itself, which was initially created as an advert for a real estate development called Hollywoodland in 1923, is owned by the city of Los Angeles.

One of the City of Angels' most beloved attractions, the sign had fallen into disrepair until it was restored in the 1970s after a campaign which saw nine donors pay $US27,777 to "adopt" one letter each.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: hollywood; losangeles; sign
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last
To: BigSkyFreeper

Where’s the donations from all the multi-millionaire actors and actresses who work there? Why don’t they pay for it?


21 posted on 03/25/2010 5:25:10 AM PDT by reagan_fanatic (Entitlements will do to America what drugs eventually do to addicts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reagan_fanatic
Where’s the donations from all the multi-millionaire actors and actresses who work there? Why don’t they pay for it?

That's what I don't understand.  Then again, they might be for the bulldozing of it because it presents itself as an environmental eyesore.

22 posted on 03/25/2010 5:44:08 AM PDT by BigSkyFreeper ("Ked Tennedy would have been plowed... I mean, proud today..." - Senator Max Baucus (Drunk-MT))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Venturer

I agree let the show begin got popcorn?


23 posted on 03/25/2010 5:46:26 AM PDT by bikerman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: reagan_fanatic
Why don’t they pay for it?

Liberals spend your money, not theirs.

24 posted on 03/25/2010 6:00:17 AM PDT by Ole Okie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Leo Carpathian

:) very good... I hope that they won’t be saved, regardless of my opinion on Hollywood. I always found them:

stinking, bad, rotten UGLY!


25 posted on 03/25/2010 9:19:40 AM PDT by Ayn And Milton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: BigSkyFreeper

Who cares? Let ‘em bulldoze it.


26 posted on 03/25/2010 9:35:52 AM PDT by calex59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BigSkyFreeper
The sign itself is not threatened, despite the hysterics of some. The property that's up for sale is above and to the left of the sign.

To some extent, the developers are playing chicken with the city. Just building a road up to the buildable spots would be an expensive challenge, and the city could hold up the permitting indefinitely. It's basically a knife-edge ridge falling to steep slopes, so short of bulldozing the entire top, the buildable area isn't that great

Here's the land in question:


27 posted on 03/25/2010 9:52:20 AM PDT by Bubba Ho-Tep ("More weight!"--Giles Corey)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ole Okie

Exactly! Why pay for it when you can get some schmuck to pay for you!


28 posted on 03/25/2010 10:22:19 AM PDT by BenKenobi ("we shall defend our Island, whatever the cost may be")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-28 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson