Posted on 03/28/2010 10:43:40 PM PDT by nickcarraway
Yeh, those Tea Party attacks and beheadings are really getting out of hand.
Excellent post Smokin’ Joe.
Stopped reading after that phrase.
Sheila Musaji, get a clue. You lookin' for an excuse to force shari'a law on us?
It's called free speech. We're exercising inalienable rights. Millions of Turkey's citizens, 99% Muslims, are not exactly fond of Islamists either, but thanks for all the work you did coming up with that list, cute. Now get lost.
Offensive, disgusting free speech can be dealt with without repressing the inalienable rights of all humans!
From another source (see below) commenting on the protests in recent years:
"More than a million Turks chanting "Turkey is secular and will remain secular", "Neither Sharia, nor coup d'etat, democratic Turkey" and "No imams in the presidential palace," demonstrated in Istanbul on 29 April after the first failed attempt on 26 April to get Foreign Minister Abdullah Gul elevated to the Presidential Palace by the ruling Islamic- rooted Justice and Development party (AKP). In an statement later Turkey's powerful secular Armed forces declared that they would safe guard secular Turkey. Two weeks earlier half a million Turks had protested in Ankara after Gul's nomination."
Gul was made president and the AKP keeps on truckin'.
See comments by K Gajendra Singh, former Indian ambassador to Turkey In the volatile middle east, Turkey is the only beacon of stability (unless you count fossilized Islamic Saudi Arabia). So what happens if Turkey goes wobbly? Violence extends to the Gulf with millions of Indians.
Turkey is a constitutional democratic Republic. Islamists want a shari'a tyranny there, we'll see what happens.
My point: Millions of Muslims don't want the shari'a crap either.
ISLAMISTS ARE NOT GETTING A SHARI'A TYRANNY HERE EITHER, BUSTER!
We do not need an Islamist to tell us what to think and say.
Sounds like one of the LaRouche douches that keep showing up at our rallies.
(Oh, all right, I read further after all. Sue me.)
Does the inference of racism here mean that all the people who compared George W. Bush to a chimpanzee hate white people? Just throwing it out there...
Anyone here have a friend that bombed the pentagon? Anyone?
Anyone here have a friend that admired the murder of Sharon Tate by the Manson gang? Anyone?
Anyone here have a friend who rushed the stage at Sarah Palin’s convention speech? Anyone?
Way to go, Smokin’ Joe.
What a way with words. :-)
When people start to recognize Obama as a puppet of the Mideast..then we’re on to the start of a solution. Why do think Palin makes them rabid?
There have been some pretty racist-sounding remarks about Meee-chelle Ma Belle on this forum, and going after the kid is NOT COOL!
It seems that the author believes that speech and action are the same.
Funny she didn’t mention the subway bombing in Moscow.
Exactly.
They are the ones creating violence against our Constitution.
I just want to be left alone and be free from European style socialism as our Founders intended
A badge of honor.
It is not violence when either a communists or muslim does it.
A muslim never resorts to hatred or violence.
When a muslin cuts your tyhroat, he does it loving, gently and through love. When he blows you to pieces, same procedure.
And the rockets fired into Israel each day? Just boys being boys and having fun. Nothing sinister there.
And the pictures taken of them a while back with Israeli’s intestines in their hands and blood on them? Just horseplay that got a little out of hand. No animonsity at all.
You must remember only Whites, Christians, and Jews commit acts of hatred and violence.
My source? The main Stream media.
Muslims talking about “hate rhetoric!” Now THAT’S funny!!!
You're correct, libs are always the ones to bring race and gender issues into any debate. That is proof that libs are the racists and sexists in the nation...it's all they ever think about. Their accusations are a matter of projecting their own racism onto others.
What is untrue about this "joke"?
0bama's made it obvious that he intends to "redistribute wealth", and the way wealth is created is through work,
and it's also obvious that all of his redistribution policies "disproportionately favor" those "of color" and hurt "whitey".
If either of these assertions are incorrect, let me know.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.