Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Army Report: GIs Outgunned in Afghanistan
Politics Daily ^ | 04/2/10 | David Wood

Posted on 04/03/2010 1:03:04 PM PDT by neverdem

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 201-214 next last
To: neverdem

M-4s?

How about some B-52s?


101 posted on 04/03/2010 3:10:14 PM PDT by exit82 (Democrats are the enemy of freedom. Sarah Palin is our Esther.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Svartalfiar

“. The 7.62, on the other hand, starts falling out of the sky at a couple hundred yards.”

Which “7.62”? 7.62 NATO or 7.62x39? The two are completely different and the 7.62 NATO certainly doesn’t fall out of the sky in only a few hundred yards.


102 posted on 04/03/2010 3:11:07 PM PDT by Favor Center (Targets Up! Hold hard and favor center!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

I’d suggest getting the Germans to put the 88 back into production. Return fire from that would discourage the snipers.


103 posted on 04/03/2010 3:17:21 PM PDT by PAR35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem
While I agree with much of the report, let the author go out 300 yards and see what i can do to him at that range.
104 posted on 04/03/2010 3:23:29 PM PDT by mad_as_he$$
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mamelukesabre
BS alert! Wind blows the 5.56 round all over the place, and beyond 300, the bullet loses too much steam to be massively damaging.

The reason Tubbs and Gallegher shoot the 5.56 is that these are service matches, requiring the use of a military service round.

The fact is, as someone pointed out up the line, the Mattie Mattel was another gift to the Leftists from Robert Macnamera. Riflemen shoot it because they have to, not because they want to.

The M-16 has gone through how many revisions, 4 or 5, and you want to do another? Odd how, for 50 years, the rifle never quite seems to do well, and one more "fix" will do the job...

Personal opinion: I was lucky enough to qualify with the M-14 in boot camp, and even over the years, with experience on the 16, FN, AK-47 and 74, the 14 was the best.

105 posted on 04/03/2010 3:24:25 PM PDT by jonascord (We've got the Constitution to protect us. Why should we worry?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: GreyFriar
Wrong. they were inspected and serviceable ones were mothballed. The Army has thousands in stock.
106 posted on 04/03/2010 3:24:31 PM PDT by mad_as_he$$
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: GreyFriar
Wrong. they were inspected and serviceable ones were mothballed. The Army has thousands in stock.
107 posted on 04/03/2010 3:24:31 PM PDT by mad_as_he$$
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Mr Rogers
My contacts among the now senior NCOs tell me that the average taliban and jihadi use the "If Allah wills it," method of markmanship. The method is known among US police as "Spray and Pray."

It's odd that I don't hear these kinds of marksmanship complaints from the Corps...

I wonder why?

108 posted on 04/03/2010 3:32:02 PM PDT by jonascord (We've got the Constitution to protect us. Why should we worry?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: mamelukesabre
762x39 is way easier to stop with a vest than 556nato.

Yes, but the enemy is not wearing vests, so which is better in that case? I think if we had a President with the balls to back out of that stupid 100 year old treaty against using JHP, our ground troops would be in a much better position.

109 posted on 04/03/2010 3:36:49 PM PDT by Thane_Banquo (Mitt Romney: He's from Harvard, and he's here to help.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer
"30’06 black tips"

You know that's an AP round, and illegal, don't you?

110 posted on 04/03/2010 3:37:58 PM PDT by jonascord (We've got the Constitution to protect us. Why should we worry?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: exit82

B-52s have proven difficult to deploy in the field. They are heavy, and most troops have difficulty carrying them on their backs. In addition, the ammunition can weigh thousands of pounds, and magazines large enough to hold the ammunition are expensive and prohibitively large.


111 posted on 04/03/2010 3:39:28 PM PDT by Thane_Banquo (Mitt Romney: He's from Harvard, and he's here to help.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: JayVee
I have been saying for over forty years that the M-16/M-4 is a popgun.

They don't call it the POODLE SHOOTER for nothing!

They need a few of these in every squad:

"In my opinion, the M1 Rifle is the greatest battle implement ever devised."

-- General George S. Patton Jr.
.

112 posted on 04/03/2010 3:40:18 PM PDT by Iron Munro ("Don't pick a fight with an old man. If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you." - Steinbeck)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: onedoug

Ping


113 posted on 04/03/2010 3:41:39 PM PDT by windcliff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thane_Banquo
Are there any Western bloc assault rifles (i.e. not machine guns) that fire the 7.26x52, besides the M14?

The FAL. And BTW, it's 7.62x51 NATO, not 52.

114 posted on 04/03/2010 3:42:53 PM PDT by Still Thinking (Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: jonascord

“”30’06 black tips”

Might be useful to have a few around. And since all guns will soon be illegal, who cares?


115 posted on 04/03/2010 3:43:43 PM PDT by bigheadfred (BE WHO YOU ARE. SAY WHAT YOU FEEL. Those who matter don't mind.Those who mind don't matter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

How about a 338 Lapua or an RSAUM?


116 posted on 04/03/2010 3:44:29 PM PDT by Still Thinking (Freedom is NOT a loophole!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Favor Center
<<“The question that needs to be asked is, why aren’t we using the most effective ammunition?”
Treaty.>>

Previously it's been ruled that open tipped ammunition IS "legal" for wartime purposes.

Link

and...

Link

So why aren't we using the most effective ammunition?
117 posted on 04/03/2010 3:45:03 PM PDT by Sylvester McMonkey McBean
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: Farmer Dean

M14s have been used extensively in the Army (see link) since the beginning of current conflicts.
They are also in use by Navy and Marines.

http://www.armytimes.com/news/2010/03/army_m14_032210w/

Over the past 5-6 years I have seen a few articles about the ineffective stopping power of the 5.56mm round. I remember one where troops stated it was taking 2-3 rounds to put down the jihadis. Also remember another where some Special Ops troops were being taught to shoot at lower abdomen rather than center mass to increase chance of stopping their target quickly by hitting a hip or major artery.


118 posted on 04/03/2010 3:46:33 PM PDT by jim-x (You cannot protect people from themselves.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

My first question too....how many M14s still around?


119 posted on 04/03/2010 3:47:00 PM PDT by wtc911 ("How you gonna get down that hill?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Jeff Cooper was predicting this twenty years ago.


120 posted on 04/03/2010 3:48:13 PM PDT by Hardastarboard (Joe McCarthy was right. He was just early.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 201-214 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson