Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Analysis: Is the tea party brewing a revolution? ["Lot of noise, no muscle." -GOP hack]
Google News / The Associated Press ^ | April 5, 2010 | Ron Fournier

Posted on 04/05/2010 5:36:26 AM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet

They heeded a pamphleteer's call for "manly opposition to the machinations of tyranny" — the 60 American colonists who stormed Griffin's Wharf and emptied 342 chests of tea into Boston Harbor. And with that, a revolution brewed.

Now, more than two centuries later, come the angry throngs of the modern-day tea party. They've gotten the nation's attention. Can they foment their own revolution?

Not yet.

The Associated Press reviewed tea party operations in almost every state, interviewing dozens of local organizers as well as Democratic and Republican strategists to produce a portrait of the movement to date — and its prospects for tilting this November's elections.

The bottom line:

Though amplifying widespread voter anger at the political establishment, the tea party movement is unlikely to dramatically affect the congressional elections — unless their local affiliates forge alliances with Republican candidates. And how likely is that? Republican operatives look at the possibility of GOP-tea party collaborations with some anxiety, and many tea party activists frankly don't want to see them.

Born of protest and populism, the United States is a nation of movements — people galvanized by causes, summoned with the latest technologies. But none of those causes — not abolition, women's votes, civil rights or anti-war — was certain to succeed in its first fateful steps, or even to leave a lasting mark.(continued)

(Excerpt) Read more at google.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: congress; democrats; economy; jourbalism; obama; obamacare; reichstaggers; taxes; teaparty
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last
To: Jedidah
So are you the Tea Party voter the writer is talking about? The guy who will stay at home and let the country sink rather than vote for his perfect candidate?

Political party affiliation isn't a marriage. You can dissolve it at any time for any reason. Clinton caused me to divorce the 'Rats. McCain did in my marriage to the Elephants. I'm tired of special interests picking our pockets while they scratch each other's backs. I favor a box on every ballot marked "None of the Above." When I go to the ballot box, I won't be conned by a 'Rat in an Elephant suit. (As a matter of fact, I'm changing my tagline for awhile.)

41 posted on 04/05/2010 6:43:54 AM PDT by NaughtiusMaximus (Don't let your vote be wasted by a 'Rat wearing an Elephant suit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: bt_dooftlook

I spelled incorrectly in haste.

quisling

a person who betrays his or her own country by aiding an invading enemy, often serving later in a puppet government; fifth columnist


42 posted on 04/05/2010 6:50:51 AM PDT by MichiganConservative (A government big enough to do unto the people you don't like will get to doing unto you soon enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

bump


43 posted on 04/05/2010 6:54:24 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer (The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

The democrats are in demonize mode. The Tea Party is the chosen target. I’m cynical enough to believe that the majority of the attacks and negative articles on the Tea Party in the MSM are to blunt dem losses at the polls this November.

The dems believe that the American anger won’t last, memories won’t last and with constant negative stories about the anger of the Tea Partiers, the electorate will fold back into a blob of couch potatos, dispirited sitting the election out.


44 posted on 04/05/2010 7:13:55 AM PDT by navymom1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
As the Taxed Enough Already movement began by embracing the Founders' principles of liberty, it seems that now is the time for it to mature into a more aptly-described movement, and without the word "Party."

"Patriots for Liberty," captures a revolutionary spirit, and it identifies what ought to be the "passion" of today's citizens, as it was of those of 1776 and 1787.

"The foundation of every government is some principle or passion in the minds of the people." John Adams

The future of liberty in the world may rely on what happens in 2010 to turn back the forces of coercive government and return to the principles of the Patriots of 1776 and 1787.

The Progressives use the word "Party" to diminish the influence of today's lovers of liberty. The debate must be framed as being between love of liberty for individuals through limited government and expanded government power over the lives of individuals.

Where government expands, liberty contracts. Thus has it been throughout the history of civilization.

The Constitution begins with "We, the People," and our servants in government are attempting to turn themselves into "Masters."

"Public opinion sets bounds to every government, and is the real sovereign in every free one." - James Madison

"Patriots for Liberty" (otherwise known as "We, the People") must send that message to members of all Parties who seek positions of power over us.

45 posted on 04/05/2010 7:20:24 AM PDT by loveliberty2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MichiganConservative

Lincoln said something similar about emancipation of our slave population.


46 posted on 04/05/2010 7:52:42 AM PDT by Loud Mime (initialpoints.net - - The Constitution as the center of politics)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Michael Steele is leaking to the AP on condition of anonymity (just like colin powel did as sec. of state)


47 posted on 04/05/2010 8:05:42 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
This was an AP story. Whatever they said you are better off not believing any of it.

Precisely.
48 posted on 04/05/2010 8:07:22 AM PDT by Oceander (The Price of Freedom is Eternal Vigilance -- Thos. Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet; A. Patriot; Blackhawk45; brityank; Darth Tokarev; Democrat_media; eaglesiniowa; ...

TEApublican Ping List - Rejecting both Third Partyism and GOP Business as Usual - for Success in 11/2010!




If you wish to be added (or removed) from this TEApublican ping list, please FReep mail with subject line “Add (or remove) TEApublican ping list” to:
TEApublicans


49 posted on 04/05/2010 8:12:45 AM PDT by SeattleBruce (God, Family, Church, Country - Keep on Tea Partiers - party like it's 1773 & pray 2 Chronicles 7:14!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeattleBruce

B T T T


50 posted on 04/05/2010 8:15:57 AM PDT by stephenjohnbanker (Support our troops....and vote out the RINOS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Republican operatives look at the possibility of GOP-tea party collaborations with some anxiety, and many tea party activists frankly don't want to see them.

Assuming that this is saying that Tea Partiers won't necessarily vote for an "R", I don't see how it can be any other way in this election cycle. The goal is to kick the Dems out, then we'll deal with the weenies in the GOP once that is accomplished. I do not want another 2 years of Obama and a Democrat Congress, but I don't think there are enough "R" voters to get the job done. We need the Tea Party folks to put aside their indifference towards some of the "R" candidates for this election cycle.

51 posted on 04/05/2010 8:17:38 AM PDT by Major Matt Mason (ClimateScandal.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus
>>The obvious answer is TEApublicanism -
 
How 'bout simple AMERICANism - where Reformation, not revolution, leads citizens back to the cornerstone of this Republic - the proper American purpose of governance:
 
"TO SECURE THESE RIGHTS, governments are instituted among men"
 
 
 
A Republic is a system of governance characterized by the Rule of Law.... as opposed to "conservative" RINO-GOP Bull manure that enabled thieves to profit from the gaming of deliberate systemic corruption.
 
"We didn't truly know the dangers of the market, because it was a dark market," says Brooksley Born, the head of an obscure federal regulatory agency -- the Commodity Futures Trading Commission [CFTC] -- who not only warned of the potential for economic meltdown in the late 1990s, but also tried to convince the country's key economic powerbrokers to take actions that could have helped avert the crisis. "They were totally opposed to it," Born says. "That puzzled me. What was it that was in this market that had to be hidden?"
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/warning/view/
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

52 posted on 04/05/2010 8:17:47 AM PDT by LomanBill (Animals! The DemocRats blew up the windmill with an Acorn!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: autumnraine
The GOP only cares about the Tea Party to the point that they hope to swipe some votes out of us.

???? Swipe?!

What are you going to do come election day? Raise hell and then stay home??

Right now the democrat party is the real enemy of this country and we have to stop it, and the only way we can is to kick these SOBs out of office. Voting 3rd party will NOT do it.

53 posted on 04/05/2010 8:31:32 AM PDT by painter (No wonder democrats don't mind taxes.THEY DON'T PAY THEM !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: painter

Yes, “SWIPE” is exactly it because when it comes to actually representing us, they ain’t it.

To be honest, I have no idea what I will do come election day. I will probably do as I did last election and hold my nose to vote for them. But I’m SICK OF DOING THAT!!

I’m sick of hearing how the GOP is supposedly FOR us and yet we have dumbo Graham (who has an “R” next to his name) discussing AMNESTY?? McCain so out of touch he claims that illegals only do the work Americans won’t do?? Yeah, that illegal on the roof of the house up the street is doing something that my unemployed roofer neighbor wouldn’t do, eh?

So yeah, the GOP is USING the disgust of the Tea Party and yet when they get done using us, they are right back to doing whatever they like.


54 posted on 04/05/2010 8:47:42 AM PDT by autumnraine (America how long will you be so deaf and dumb to the chariot wheels carrying you to the guillotine?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: painter
>>Voting 3rd party will NOT do it.
 
 
How many "parties" are mentioned in the American First Principles, written in stone in the Jefferson Memorial?






"COMMERCE BETWEEN MASTER AND SLAVE IS DESPOTISM"
 
 
America was never intended to be just a two-party exercise in dialectic sheeple herding for the benefit of an Oligarchic Kleptocracy.   
 
The GOP's RINO Apparatchik elite can go stuff themselves.

55 posted on 04/05/2010 8:48:40 AM PDT by LomanBill (Animals! The DemocRats blew up the windmill with an Acorn!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Quaint (and predictable) how the AP frames the debate, eh?

So the Tea-Partiers are the revolutionaries, are they?

If I were Mr. Fournier, I'd look elsewhere.

56 posted on 04/05/2010 8:50:46 AM PDT by daler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: autumnraine
So, why don't you go do something about Graham. He is a Senator from South Carolina. Little we can do about him here, but if you move there maybe you can.

Remember 60% of the housing in SC is TRAILERS, which may or may not be familiar territory, but if you start door to door, and remember trailers usually only have two doors, you could probably cover a lot of territory before the next election.

57 posted on 04/05/2010 8:55:33 AM PDT by muawiyah ("Git Out The Way")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: LomanBill
America was designed with single-member districts. Therefore it follows that the Founders were biased in favor of two main parties.

It's in the math of winning.

58 posted on 04/05/2010 8:56:54 AM PDT by muawiyah ("Git Out The Way")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: SeattleBruce

They underestimate, they will see in Nov. won’t they?


59 posted on 04/05/2010 8:58:16 AM PDT by JustPiper (Rearrange the letters in "PRESIDENT BARAK OBAMA" and you get "AN ARAB BACKED IMPOSTER"~Coincidence?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
>>Therefore it follows that the Founders were biased in favor of two main parties.
"that we here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain -- that this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom
 -- and that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth."
 
Abraham Lincoln,
Gettysburg, Pennsylvania
November 19, 1863
 
 
A Republic is a system, of governance characterized by the Rule of Law.   In America, that framework of law constitutes a representative democracy.  
 
"Government Of the People, By the People, For the People"
 
American Republic or Democracy?  BOTH or neither.

60 posted on 04/05/2010 9:14:53 AM PDT by LomanBill (Animals! The DemocRats blew up the windmill with an Acorn!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson