Mr. McCarthy wrote, I dont think there is much difference, if any, between Islam and Islamism.
Islamists are Muslims who would like to see sharia (Islamic law) installed. That is the necessary precondition to Islamicizing a society. It is the purpose of jihad. The terrorists are willing to force sharias installation by violent jihad; other Islamists have varying views about the usefulness of violence, but they also want sharia, and their jihadist methods include tactics other than violence. I reluctantly use the term Islamist rather than Islam because I believe there are hundreds of millions of Muslims who do not want to live under sharia, and who want religion to be a private matter, separated from public life. It is baffling to me why these people are Muslims since, as I understand Islam, (a) sharia is a basic element, and (b) Islam rejects the separation of mosque and state. But Im not a Muslim, so that is not for me to say. I think we have to encourage the non-sharia Muslims and give them space to try to reform their religion, so I believe its worth labeling the sharia seekers Islamists in order to sort them out. But I admit being very conflicted about it because I also concede that the Islamists have the more coherent (and scary) construction of Islam. We wouldnt be encouraging reform if we really thought Islam was fine as is.
The number of “peaceful” Muslims may be a similar percentage to those Germans who opposed Hitler’s policies. Too small a number to be worthy of consideration.
bump.