[silverleaf]

OK, you’re on.

I say the good LtCol is a goner for failure to follow orders of his lawful superiors. and zerO’s swearing in by the USSC made him “lawful”, thank you for nothing Chief Justice Roberts.

I believe the regime will win. If our govt, any agency of our govt, any official of our govt, wanted zerO to be exposed, it would have happened.

By now, they are all complicit in his fraud.

[kiltie65]

The first swearing in, I have begun to believe, was deliberately bungled. We never SAW the second swearing in...just some clips after the fact. What are we to think? Has he ever been sworn in? Was he sworn in, but on the Quran? Was special langugage used if he was sworn in, so neither the Justice or Obummer can be brought up on charges later if fraud is exposed? More questions...no answers.

[El Gato]

zerO’s swearing in by the USSC made him “lawful”,

No it did not. There is not even any requirement in the law, let alone the Constitution that the Chief Justice or any Justice "swear in" (a misnomer) a President Elect. The Constitution requires the before he enter into the execution of the officer, he must take the oath of office. But it also requires other things:

Getting the majority of electoral votes, check.
Be 35 or older, probably check, but w/o the BC who knows for certain.
Be 14 years a US resident, Check

Be a natural born citizen... might be a problem there.

What actually makes someone the lawful President is satisfying all the requirements above, and then it's up to the calender and the clock. Noon on January 20th following the election. The guy could have met all the requirements, sworn the oath in writing the day before, but he would not be President until noon on the 20th. That whole "inauguration" thing is tradition, not Constitutional requirement. Presidents have become so without a Supreme Court administering the oath, and not just in the "emergency" cases like LBJ swearing the oath on AF-1 on the tarmac at Love Field in Dallas, administered by Judge Sarah Hughes and witnessed by a handful of people, including Jacqueline Kennedy.

Even dragging out Judge Sarah was "overkill", he could have just read the oath before witnesses, or signed it.

Our prior inelible president took his oath before a New York State Supreme Court judge. Also like Obama, he repeated it, this time before a US SC justice, "out of an abundance of caution". (Of course he didn't muff it like Obama and Roberts did the first time)

Calvin Coolidge had his oath administered by his father, a notory public, when President Harding died a continent away in California. He also repeated the oath, but he *was* President from the time he took the oath the first time.

[TheThinker]

I say the good LtCol is a goner for failure to follow orders of his lawful superiors. and zerO’s swearing in by the USSC made him “lawful”, thank you for nothing Chief Justice Roberts.

Someone's bound to get lucky regarding the Usurper-in-Chief's BC.

"Luck is tenacity of purpose." - Elbert Hubbard

[little jeremiah]

“The past history is not necessarily an indication of future events”.

Just because something hasn’t happened yet, doesn’t mean it won’t. Don’t be a white flag waving defeatist!

[bgill]

I believe the regime will win. If our govt, any agency of our govt, any official of our govt, wanted zerO to be exposed, it would have happened. By now, they are all complicit in his fraud.

And that's why the cases are being dismissed. If it does get in the door, the entire house of cards will fall. As you said Roberts swore him in once, twice, how many times and it still wasn't right? And then Cheney didn't ask for questions from the electors. Senate Resolution 511 was to "prove" McRino's eligibility but I didn't see a Senate or House resolution for Hussein (who sat in on McRino's and agreed that NBC = 2 US citizen parents). Then there's the two DNC "certifications" Pelosi signed for Hawaii and the one in Arkansas that is date stamped a year ahead of time. Yep, it's all about CYA for themselves and to heck with rest of America.